The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 27 December 2018, 03:40 AM   #91
kog
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: uk
Posts: 148
WOW, I never new the Daytona was only 40mm, with those three sub dials I assumed it would be a bigger watch.

How big is the Omega Man on the moon watch?
kog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 December 2018, 03:42 AM   #92
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by kog View Post
WOW, I never new the Daytona was only 40mm, with those three sub dials I assumed it would be a bigger watch.

How big is the Omega Man on the moon watch?
which LE is that one?

The speedy pro moon watch is 42mm. It wears small for 42 though as i think a sky dweller at 42mm wears larger
__________________
Instagram: tyler.watches
current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition)
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 December 2018, 03:49 AM   #93
Roger Lococco
"TRF" Member
 
Roger Lococco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Real Name: Roger Lococco
Location: Asia
Watch: 126719BLRO Pepsi
Posts: 2,844
I don’t wear mine very often, but here it is today.

For the forum - too big, too small, or just right?

I’ll share my vitals later...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
116500 Daytona White Dial
126710BLNR GMT II
126719BLRO Blue Dial Pepsi GMT II
Roger Lococco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 December 2018, 03:50 AM   #94
037
2024 Pledge Member
 
037's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 6,171
Quote:
Originally Posted by kog View Post
WOW, I never new the Daytona was only 40mm, with those three sub dials I assumed it would be a bigger watch.
The ceramic stainless Daytona is 38.5mm. It's not 40mm as advertised, hence why so many say it wears or seems small.

I think the size is great but can appreciate why not everyone would.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Lococco View Post
For the forum - too big, too small, or just right?
Looks fine to me. Black dial is better though.
037 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 December 2018, 03:59 AM   #95
kog
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: uk
Posts: 148
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyler1980 View Post
which LE is that one?

The speedy pro moon watch is 42mm. It wears small for 42 though as i think a sky dweller at 42mm wears larger
Umm interesting, I've seen the moon watch in the metal and thought it was small. Not to say there is anything wrong with the size, its just the photos show them looking larger than life.

But I remember when I went to try on a Sea Dweller I also tried on a Deep Sea, and I remember thinking to myself in the shop that the Sea Dweller appeared small, but that was because it was up against a bigger watch

I now have the Sea Dweller and it's not small at all it feels a perfect size.

Watching a film last night with Cameron Diaz, and she's wearing a Sub, but because she has a thin bulid the Sub looks BIG on her wrist. Because watches are small and we are so used to looking at these pictures on the net and seeing them magnified it throws our psychology of track a little.
kog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 December 2018, 05:22 AM   #96
Gimoozaabi
"TRF" Member
 
Gimoozaabi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LBSF
Watch: ing the grass grow
Posts: 688
Last time when I was at the local AD, the owner let me try his platinum Daytona. It didn't wear small on my 7,5 inch flat wrist. As it is executed in PM it was much heavier in comparison with my 116610lv.

As I am after a 116500, I believe the stainless steel/ceramic bezel Daytona will wear similarly to the 39mm Explorer. Can someone who has (or already compared) both watches confirm this?



Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
Gimoozaabi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 December 2018, 06:36 AM   #97
crazycarlitos
"TRF" Member
 
crazycarlitos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,906
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vince KSA View Post
I agree I have the SS Daytona Ceramic 116500LN.

I absolutely love the watch, but reading the time is at times difficult. Likewise when you see the average shot with the words Daytona in red, there is no way my 50 year old eyes can see that without my glasses and examining the dial in detail.

After 3 months with my 116500Ln I have decided;

It is a keeper.
It's not an everyday watch, for example at work I need to see the time in
an instant. My Omega does this better.
For nights out, or more formal occasions the 116500Ln is my default
choice.
I've had many comments on the Daytona, all positive, including twice - I
don't usually like Rolex but that is lovely, both times this was a lady
commenting..

I think that the below shot just shows the difference on how difficult the time is to read in an instant on the 116500LN, put in the factor of 90% of the time I need reading glasses then you may see my point.
Agreed on most part.

Personally I feel ss Daytona wears small... but the biggest drawback for me is the difficulty reading the time instantly. With my Pam or Omega, I can see the time clearly, right away.

Daytona is beautiful... but more of a jewelry than a watch imho. Perhaps that’s why so many ladies prefer Daytona.

Flame suit on. Lol
__________________
crazycarlitos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 December 2018, 06:37 AM   #98
brucethemanlee
"TRF" Member
 
brucethemanlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: 1 of 13 Colonies
Posts: 8,490
You will get used to the size really quickly


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
brucethemanlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 December 2018, 10:21 AM   #99
Amochosto
"TRF" Member
 
Amochosto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Canada
Watch: Me
Posts: 1,168
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gimoozaabi View Post
Last time when I was at the local AD, the owner let me try his platinum Daytona. It didn't wear small on my 7,5 inch flat wrist. As it is executed in PM it was much heavier in comparison with my 116610lv.

As I am after a 116500, I believe the stainless steel/ceramic bezel Daytona will wear similarly to the 39mm Explorer. Can someone who has (or already compared) both watches confirm this?



Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
Not the same watch I know, but the Daytona wears quite similar to the 16570 Explorer II.
__________________
1771036

Stupidity is doomed, therefore, to cringe at every syllable of wisdom

Heraclitus of Ephesus
Amochosto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 December 2018, 12:59 PM   #100
HogwldFLTR
2024 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: What's on my wrist
Posts: 33,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Lococco View Post
I don’t wear mine very often, but here it is today.

For the forum - too big, too small, or just right?

I’ll share my vitals later...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Looks great to me!!!
__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 December 2018, 01:05 PM   #101
Solo118
"TRF" Member
 
Solo118's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 6,063
Daytona might be small for some, but it is the perfect size for me. I have been wearing all sorts of Daytonas for over 12 years, and I will never stop.
Solo118 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 December 2018, 01:25 PM   #102
mistercoach32
"TRF" Member
 
mistercoach32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: SD43
Posts: 894
I’ve had two chances to purchase Daytona’s and passed for that exact reason.
mistercoach32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 December 2018, 11:04 PM   #103
Gimoozaabi
"TRF" Member
 
Gimoozaabi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LBSF
Watch: ing the grass grow
Posts: 688
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amochosto View Post
Not the same watch I know, but the Daytona wears quite similar to the 16570 Explorer II.
Thanks for your reply! I have exactly the same Exp2 reference and the comparison is really helpful.

May I brother you for side by side pics or wrist shots? Thanks!


Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
Gimoozaabi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2018, 06:03 AM   #104
Rrpdc
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Dc
Posts: 2,002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sublovin View Post
Thanks for correcting my opinion. Yes, it does wear small. It isn’t a particularly thick watch, and the wrist presence is much less than a 38mm Heuer Monaco
+1.
Rrpdc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2018, 06:13 AM   #105
Rrpdc
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Dc
Posts: 2,002
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazycarlitos View Post
Agreed on most part.

Personally I feel ss Daytona wears small...

Daytona is beautiful... but more of a jewelry than a watch imho. Perhaps that’s why so many ladies prefer Daytona.

Flame suit on. Lol

but completely agree. Only have 6.75 wrists and wearing my wg Daytona felt ... dainty to be honest. Felt like wearing a 36mm I have which I never wear.


I’m sure 95% of the people that say the Daytona is perfect Watch would opt for 40-41mm size if Rolex offered that as an option. Beautiful watch but wears small and much smaller than advertised... just a fact.
Rrpdc is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.