The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21 September 2020, 05:14 AM   #1
daOnlyBG
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Odorious Onion
Watch: yes, it's hipster
Posts: 1,568
(Beginner's) Macro shot of red paint on 126710BLRO's GMT Hand

Hello all, I'm a novice at macro-photography, and have much to learn. After a little experimenting, though, I was able to get a close-up of the "red paint issue" on the GMT-Master II's GMT hand.

And the issue?

There is no issue. Paint makes a nice "dome" shape that peaks at the arrow.




If anyone experienced with photographing watches closely would like to share tips (especially when managing lighting) feel free to drop a line!
__________________
Here come dat boi Jerry
daOnlyBG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2020, 05:19 AM   #2
bmb15
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: -
Posts: 351
(Beginner's) Macro shot of red paint on 126710BLRO's GMT Hand

Hello, nice shot. Which camera and objective you are using?
bmb15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2020, 05:20 AM   #3
Speedbird-1
"TRF" Member
 
Speedbird-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Steve.
Location: UK
Posts: 6,070
Good effort.
What camera/lens are you using?
Speedbird-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2020, 05:22 AM   #4
dpt.calvin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: TRF
Posts: 2,266
Was this taken with a macro lens add-on for a cell phone? Genuine question.

Macro photography is difficult. You’ll want a stable tripod, good lighting, and good glass. Try macro extension tubes if you’re not ready to invest in a true macro lens.
__________________
dpt.calvin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2020, 05:28 AM   #5
bmb15
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: -
Posts: 351

My first try with a 5513 Submariner
bmb15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2020, 05:28 AM   #6
daOnlyBG
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Odorious Onion
Watch: yes, it's hipster
Posts: 1,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpt.calvin View Post
Was this taken with a macro lens add-on for a cell phone? Genuine question.

Macro photography is difficult. You’ll want a stable tripod, good lighting, and good glass. Try macro extension tubes if you’re not ready to invest in a true macro lens.
It was actually with a Canon T6 DSLR and a 50mm Canon f/1.4 lens, using a couple macro "close up" filter lens. To be honest, I think lighting is way more critical than novices make it out to be. Diffusing the light tends to be a challenge... if I'm not mistaken.
__________________
Here come dat boi Jerry
daOnlyBG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2020, 05:29 AM   #7
bmb15
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: -
Posts: 351

5513 Submariner (cont.)
bmb15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2020, 05:30 AM   #8
dpt.calvin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: TRF
Posts: 2,266
Rather than a close up filter lens, look at extension tubes. Also, focus stacking.
dpt.calvin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2020, 05:30 AM   #9
daOnlyBG
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Odorious Onion
Watch: yes, it's hipster
Posts: 1,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmb15 View Post
OK, that is cool. I know individual skills/the "guy behind the camera" is a critical component of taking pics like that, but from what I've seen, your pic had to be taken with some powerful lens, no?
__________________
Here come dat boi Jerry
daOnlyBG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2020, 05:37 AM   #10
bmb15
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: -
Posts: 351
Quote:
Originally Posted by daOnlyBG View Post
OK, that is cool. I know individual skills/the "guy behind the camera" is a critical component of taking pics like that, but from what I've seen, your pic had to be taken with some powerful lens, no?
Thanks, the difficulty is a good illumination and a macro lens. This specific photo was taken w/o focus stacking, which sometimes helps a lot.
bmb15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2020, 05:37 AM   #11
Henrimontgomery
"TRF" Member
 
Henrimontgomery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Switzerland
Watch: yourself
Posts: 1,203
That lume looks like mold! Nice shot.
Henrimontgomery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2020, 05:43 AM   #12
bmb15
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: -
Posts: 351

5513 Submariner (cont.)
bmb15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2020, 05:45 AM   #13
DCheeta
"TRF" Member
 
DCheeta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,180
Nice shot. Here’s my BLNR’s blue arrow.

DCheeta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2020, 05:49 AM   #14
daOnlyBG
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Odorious Onion
Watch: yes, it's hipster
Posts: 1,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmb15 View Post
Thanks, the difficulty is a good illumination and a macro lens. This specific photo was taken w/o focus stacking, which sometimes helps a lot.
Nice. Which lens were you using, if I may ask? Did you need to attach anything to it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dpt.calvin View Post
Rather than a close up filter lens, look at extension tubes. Also, focus stacking.
I'll look into extension tubes- thanks. A big problem I seem to be running into is the depth of field. With a 1.4 aperture (?) I tend to not get much depth, but my understanding tells me that if I go for more aperture, I'll need something else to make up for lost magnification. Am I understanding that trade-off correctly? If so, would the extension tubes help "restore" that magnification problem?
__________________
Here come dat boi Jerry
daOnlyBG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2020, 05:54 AM   #15
bmb15
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: -
Posts: 351
Quote:
Originally Posted by daOnlyBG View Post
Nice. Which lens were you using, if I may ask? Did you need to attach anything to it?
As a diver I use an underwater camera, which may be a surprise for some here. The Olympus Tough TG-5 which has a macro. Settings: in microscope mode, possibility of focus stacking is very powerful. "Obviously" the illumination and viewing angles are important, to minimise crystal reflections well. I have no professional setup!
bmb15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2020, 06:02 AM   #16
bmb15
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: -
Posts: 351

16710 GMT Master II (stick dial)
bmb15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2020, 06:05 AM   #17
Binky1
"TRF" Member
 
Binky1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: UK
Watch: Sub 16610LN
Posts: 332
Great thread....now this is what TRF imho is about. More pics please!
__________________
16610LN | 126710 BLRO | 228235 RG Olive | 126300 Slate | 326934 Blue | G Shock GA2100 | 116500LN White
Binky1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2020, 06:08 AM   #18
bmb15
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: -
Posts: 351
Quote:
Originally Posted by Binky1 View Post
Great thread....now this is what TRF imho is about. More pics please!
Thanks. Ok, a few more macro shots from my Sea-Dweller (126600) and GMT-Master II (16710).
bmb15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2020, 06:11 AM   #19
bmb15
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: -
Posts: 351

Single Red Sea-Dweller 126600, Mk1, full view
bmb15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2020, 06:11 AM   #20
bmb15
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: -
Posts: 351

Single Red Sea-Dweller 126600, Mk1, partial view, with laser engraved crown on the crystal, with focus stacking
bmb15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2020, 06:12 AM   #21
bmb15
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: -
Posts: 351

Single Red Sea-Dweller 126600, Mk1, partial shallow angle view with laser engraved crown on the crystal, with focus stacking.

The last 3 photos are my first tries for this dial. The sun is a very good and natural light source!
bmb15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2020, 06:15 AM   #22
dpt.calvin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: TRF
Posts: 2,266
Quote:
Originally Posted by daOnlyBG View Post
Nice. Which lens were you using, if I may ask? Did you need to attach anything to it?



I'll look into extension tubes- thanks. A big problem I seem to be running into is the depth of field. With a 1.4 aperture (?) I tend to not get much depth, but my understanding tells me that if I go for more aperture, I'll need something else to make up for lost magnification. Am I understanding that trade-off correctly? If so, would the extension tubes help "restore" that magnification problem?
Extension tubes will reduce the minimum focus distance without compromising your glass. The 50/1.4 is a decent lens that Canon engineered. No use in placing , probably, cheap piece of glass (the filter) in front of it.

With macro, you typically want to stay in the range of f/5.6-11. You’ll need a lot more light than you’re used to.
dpt.calvin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2020, 06:47 AM   #23
bmb15
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: -
Posts: 351

GMT Hand (16710) photo (1) just taken for this thread, light not optimized, with focus stacking, no tripod.
F5.6 (aperture), 14.4 mm (focal length)
bmb15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 September 2020, 06:47 AM   #24
bmb15
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: -
Posts: 351

GMT Hand (16710) photo (2) just taken for this thread, light not optimized, with focus stacking, no tripod.
F5.6 (aperture), 14.4 mm (focal length)
bmb15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
126710blro , blro , gmt hand , photograph


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.