|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
28 September 2018, 11:31 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Boston
Posts: 3
|
Fake 5513?
Hi all,
I came across this posting of a 5513. The photo quality is terrible and number of photos are limited, but I thought I'd give it a shot in case some of you guys can share some input. My very limited knowledge tells me that the dial belongs to a Maxi III. Thanks in advance! I9WnloW.jpg CUSkS8E.jpg GnyMOIT.jpg zm2F1R6.jpg |
|
|
|
29 September 2018, 12:04 AM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Chicago
Watch: Doxa Pro 300 NoT
Posts: 535
|
The watch looks OK to me. But it's difficult to properly assess the watch with these pictures.
|
|
|
|
|
29 September 2018, 12:27 AM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Barrowford
Watch: Tudor Black Bay 54
Posts: 1,699
|
Although they are bad pictures, I personally can't see a massive amount wrong with that watch.
__________________
Rolex Explorer 214270, Omega Speedmaster '1957 Relaunch' 3594.50.00, Panerai Luminor 1950 PAM00127-E, Panerai Radiomir 1936 PAM00249-I, Panerai Mare Nostrum PAM00716-T, Panerai PAM00785-Q Set, Panerai Luminor Black Seal PAM00594-Q, Panerai Luminor Daylight PAM00604-Q, Tudor Black Bay 54 79000N, Heuer Carrera Re-Edition CS3113, Hamilton Military W10 & TAG Heuer F1
|
|
|
|
|
29 September 2018, 09:50 AM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Chicago
Watch: Doxa Pro 300 NoT
Posts: 535
|
I guess the question is: "why is the seller providing such low quality pictures for an expensive watch?"
As people here say all the time: buy the seller, not the watch. |
|
|
|
 |
| Tags |
| 5513 , fake , submariner , vintage |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
