Why Do We Mix Rolex and Tudor Here?

[HogwldFLTR]

Originally Posted by AzHadEnuf

This shouldn’t take too much longer.

And gone...Seems like this thread should be next.

[SAAS]

So people who have been priced out of the Tudor market have something to aspire to.

[cts]

Originally Posted by Bobby T

Separate Tudor thread section is long overdue!!!!

Yes

[bp1000]

Because you wouldn’t make your kids live in separate houses either

They are both the same. One is more shiny and sparkly than the other.

Just like cars. Same underneath but slap on some chrome bits and put some stitching on the leather and voila, premium price tag

And while we are on this subject anyone who proclaims Tudor is the poor mans Rolex and that nothing comes close to the “crown”, should be banned. This is not a forum for people interested solely in status.

[214270Explorer]

Originally Posted by padi56

I think you owe the members of this forum a apology,or better still please leave and start your own forum, perhaps you will be more happy then, and get no further Tudor annoyance .

That. One less whiner whom we do not need.

I am here to learn and enjoy the forum for the good stuff it presents. Sometimes that means ignoring certain issues.

[Yachtbuoy]

Originally Posted by Bigblu10

Ever heard of the ROLEX 24 hours at DAYTONA car race?

I don't see the word TUDOR in there, and likely never will be.

Feel free not to engage with Tudor threads, I guess.

[sokoloka]

Grown men and mass produced trinkets. Wonders never cease.

[Deep Sea]

Both great watches, both worthy of wrist time.

[r_afficionado]

In my humble collection I have both Rolex and Tudor I enjoy both of them. I enjoy the craftsmanship, history, lineage, of both. I owned Rolex first then through TRF I learned much about Tudor. It peaked my interest and I went on a bender seeking Tudor info. Then I purchased my first Tudor the Pelagos Blue. Next the GMT and now considering the BB58 Blue going to go see it at AD tomorrow. So in short these brands are intertwined and should remain so here.



Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

[hnn17]

After 11 years what a silly way to get banned.

[Chewbacca]

Originally Posted by hnn17

After 11 years what a silly way to get banned.

Something doesn’t add up.

[jlovda]

If you remove the Tudors from this forum I will have no place to vent about snowflake hands.

[blue lion]

Originally Posted by Gold Crown

Wouldn't it make more sense to have a separate Tudor section? Its really not a Rolex in the full sense. All these Tudor posts are starting to get me annoyed.

Separate makes sense to me but it doesn't annoy me.

[Frank McKay]

TOTALLY AGREE.

Tudor should have its own Sub-Forum. Frankly getting tired of the barrage of “Tudor” posts and incomings. As a huge Rolex watch fan, I have no interest whatsoever in the Tudor brand.

[srvrf]

Originally Posted by Frank McKay

TOTALLY AGREE.

Tudor should have its own Sub-Forum. Frankly getting tired of the barrage of “Tudor” posts and incomings. As a huge Rolex watch fan, I have no interest whatsoever in the Tudor brand.

Then maybe scroll past the posts?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[4 Aussies]

Originally Posted by hnn17

After 11 years what a silly way to get banned.

It was just his time. It was just his time.

[kieselguhr]

Originally Posted by Chewbacca

Something doesn’t add up.

Did you go through post history to see if there was a behavior delta?

Maybe he was drunk

[jlovda]

Why don't we get rid of the Vintage section. People here have both old and new watches.

[Tools]

I've looked through the first two busy pages here.. I only found a half dozen Tudor threads.

Not sure I see a reason to banish Tudor from the Rolex part of the Forum, as if it was a hidden secret that we couldn't discuss in the open.

They have always been part of the Rolex Oyster line of products.

tudormain.jpg

[Dr.Brian]

Strange thread.
Some observations...
Drunk posting is bad.
Some people don’t seem to understand how to skim topics to find ones that they want to read on a forum.
I like seeing the Tudor content.
If it’s actually annoying, perhaps some introspection is in order.
I’m annoyed at the mods for banning him as now we will never know how to find his precious metals only Rolex forum! Like the Ferrari owners forum, proof of ownership required.
Chill out, you’ll live longer.
I’ll tell Steve how to run the forum when he asks, which will almost certainly be never.
Won’t miss the OP. Delusions of grandeur, trans jokes, first world problems, elitism, etc.

[Chewbacca]

Originally Posted by kieselguhr

Did you go through post history to see if there was a behavior delta?

Maybe he was drunk

I’m busy drinking! Who has time for that!?

[bezler]

Originally Posted by Gold Crown

Wouldn't it make more sense to have a separate Tudor section? Its really not a Rolex in the full sense. All these Tudor posts are starting to get me annoyed.

It's a strange quirk of the forums, but eventually you'll get used to it.

[kieselguhr]

Originally Posted by Chewbacca

I’m busy drinking! Who has time for that!?

I was about to say something about him attempting CJ status. Clearly there can only be one

[r_afficionado]

Originally Posted by Frank McKay

TOTALLY AGREE.

Tudor should have its own Sub-Forum. Frankly getting tired of the barrage of “Tudor” posts and incomings. As a huge Rolex watch fan, I have no interest whatsoever in the Tudor brand.

You know this is a Rolex and Tudor forum right? This is not new... there are FB pages that are Rolex only... maybe that is more your style...

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

[Ssunnylee24]

Originally Posted by Frank McKay

TOTALLY AGREE.

Tudor should have its own Sub-Forum. Frankly getting tired of the barrage of “Tudor” posts and incomings. As a huge Rolex watch fan, I have no interest whatsoever in the Tudor brand.

Don’t ever call your self a huge rolex watch fan. Ever.

[shaunylw]

Originally Posted by Ssunnylee24

Don’t ever call your self a huge rolex watch fan. Ever.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Bigblu10]

Originally Posted by Tools

I've looked through the first two busy pages here.. I only found a half dozen Tudor threads.

Not sure I see a reason to banish Tudor from the Rolex part of the Forum, as if it was a hidden secret that we couldn't discuss in the open.

They have always been part of the Rolex Oyster line of products.

Attachment 1147481

If your last sentence is true, then why doesn't every Rolex dealer also sell Tudor? That is certainly not the case at all. Wouldn't surprise me if many Rolex dealers have no interest in Tudor also.

[ganiccus]

Originally Posted by Bigblu10

If your last sentence is true, then why doesn't every Rolex dealer also sell Tudor? That is certainly not the case at all. Wouldn't surprise me if many Rolex dealers have no interest in Tudor also.

Maybe they should because my AD only carries Rolex and that toxic Tag Heuer sludge. I would rather buy a Tudor every day of the week, twice on sundays than those miserable Tag pretending to be something they are not.

[angerbot]

Tudor is what Rolex used to be, which is why they have a titanium tool watch and Rolex doesn't. Rolex is the brand for overpriced trinkets.

Of course I own both because I enjoy both tool watches and overpriced trinkets :)

[Chewbacca]

Originally Posted by kieselguhr

I was about to say something about him attempting CJ status. Clearly there can only be one

Now I forgot to get limes.

Thanks for distracting me!