The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25 June 2019, 07:37 AM   #61
Rags
2024 Pledge Member
 
Rags's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chuck
Location: SW Florida
Watch: 16233,16610,214270
Posts: 11,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by s.m.b. View Post
What's a "maxi case"? Supercase, FWIW! And you've been a member since 2009... and you've yet to realize plenty of people dislike the thicker lugs on the six digit references. JFC! What's the point of threads like this?
If you don’t like the thread then don’t respond to it.
__________________
16233 Y Serial Datejust
16610 Z Serial Submariner
214270 Explorer

114300 Oyster Perpetual
76200 Tudor Date+Day
Rags is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 07:56 AM   #62
Mr.Rolex1
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Mike
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 1,197
I personally prefer pre-ceramic

It seems people who wear larger watches and became a fan after 2008 are supercase fans.
Mr.Rolex1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 09:07 AM   #63
yOyOYoo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: CA
Watch: 116519LN
Posts: 614
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones View Post
Supercase lugs for sport and aesthetics closer to the earliest models. If I wanted DateJust lugs, I’d get a DateJust.
I remember there was a thread here ~5 years ago that detailed exactly this. That the Submariner Ceramic supercase looked more like the original Submariners while the 5 digits did not.
yOyOYoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 09:23 AM   #64
Seibei
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: New Zealand
Watch: 114060
Posts: 2,630
I love the maxi case.
Seibei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 09:26 AM   #65
FreshPrince14
"TRF" Member
 
FreshPrince14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: TRF
Watch: 16710 & 6694
Posts: 791
I agree. Although the Maxi case is growing on me, I do feel it's to square and bulky. The 5 digit case is just far more aesthetically pleasing.

Sent from my CLT-L09 using Tapatalk
FreshPrince14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 09:29 AM   #66
Rags
2024 Pledge Member
 
Rags's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chuck
Location: SW Florida
Watch: 16233,16610,214270
Posts: 11,183
I actually thought about selling my 16610 for the newer model but the more I looked at it I found that I prefer mine so I'm keeping it..
__________________
16233 Y Serial Datejust
16610 Z Serial Submariner
214270 Explorer

114300 Oyster Perpetual
76200 Tudor Date+Day
Rags is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 09:32 AM   #67
alphasports
"TRF" Member
 
alphasports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Montreal CAN
Posts: 454
Quote:
Originally Posted by ROlesorusLEX View Post
Maxi case. Super dial. Hulk, bluesy, Smurf. It's all made up. Not all that ire-inducing, for the most part.
This.

The self-righteous do get on my nerves on occasion.
alphasports is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 10:03 AM   #68
TimeToWatch
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: TRF
Watch: Rolex & AP
Posts: 1,757
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rags View Post
Does anyone else not like the maxi case on the ceramic submariner? I love the larger indices & hands, the glidelock bracelet is fantastic but I prefer the case that's on my 16610 Sub. Anyone else feel the same way that I do?
I agree with your sentiments and sold my 116610LN for a 116600 as a result
TimeToWatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 10:30 AM   #69
Vishy26
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Krishna
Location: Australia
Posts: 611
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rags View Post
I actually thought about selling my 16610 for the newer model but the more I looked at it I found that I prefer mine so I'm keeping it..
Vishy26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 10:38 AM   #70
HogwldFLTR
2024 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: What's on my wrist
Posts: 33,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rags View Post
Does anyone else not like the maxi case on the ceramic submariner? I love the larger indices & hands, the glidelock bracelet is fantastic but I prefer the case that's on my 16610 Sub. Anyone else feel the same way that I do?
I find the Maxi case just too large for my wrist. That's enough reason for me to not own one. I had a 114060 but it didn't last long; I really preferred the feel of the 14060 on my wrist. I do think a major advantage of the Maxi is that it can withstand more polishes.
__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 10:53 AM   #71
BigPapiDoesItAgain
"TRF" Member
 
BigPapiDoesItAgain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Real Name: John
Location: Louisiana
Watch: Too Many
Posts: 216
5 digit for me. My point of comparison is the 16610 sub and 116710LN GMT that I own...I prefer the case shape and profile of the 5 digit models and also the smaller, more delicate appearing hands, which goes along with the smaller markers.
BigPapiDoesItAgain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 11:01 AM   #72
Krash
2024 Pledge Member
 
Krash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Florida
Watch: Sub, DJ41, GMT
Posts: 7,051
114060 is my favorite. I wouldn't change a thing.
Krash is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 11:03 AM   #73
Bigblu10
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Jaime
Location: Here
Posts: 5,606
Truthfully, I can't believe this subject is still being discussed 10 years after the fact. If you don't like the modern Submariner which IMO is a masterpiece, stick with the previous generation with thin case, small lugs and small pointy crown guards.
Bigblu10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 11:42 AM   #74
hbk75
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 705
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigblu10 View Post
Truthfully, I can't believe this subject is still being discussed 10 years after the fact. If you don't like the modern Submariner which IMO is a masterpiece, stick with the previous generation with thin case, small lugs and small pointy crown guards.
OP is saying if you like maxi cases then do not reply here.
hbk75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 11:50 AM   #75
grabby
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: RMI
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigblu10 View Post
Truthfully, I can't believe this subject is still being discussed 10 years after the fact. If you don't like the modern Submariner which IMO is a masterpiece, stick with the previous generation with thin case, small lugs and small pointy crown guards.
I think the fact it is still talked about drives home just how divisive and odd the maxi case is. I prefer to buy new watches with the newest advancements in movements and bracelets, and I'm sure others do to. Thus the bemoaning over Rolex acquiescing to the trend of larger cases with the introduction of the 6 digits. I guess deep down many of us hope our sport-bitching will eventually be noticed and Rolex will coddle us with slimmer-lugged divers in the future!
grabby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 11:53 AM   #76
Jackumi
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Real Name: John
Location: Yokohama
Watch: 116613LB, 116713LN
Posts: 218
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigblu10 View Post
Truthfully, I can't believe this subject is still being discussed 10 years after the fact. If you don't like the modern Submariner which IMO is a masterpiece, stick with the previous generation with thin case, small lugs and small pointy crown guards.
Leave them alone, it's just the thin case lovers that have insecurity issues. They like to post on here every now and then to give each other high fives.
Jackumi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 11:55 AM   #77
grabby
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: RMI
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbk75 View Post
OP is saying if you like maxi cases then do not reply here.
I didn't read that at all. Openly airing his disappointment with the current generation of the most iconic watch ever is not the same as stifling opposing views. Quite the opposite, actually. Being frustrated with a response that was purely pedantic has nothing to do with opposing viewpoints.
grabby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 11:57 AM   #78
hbk75
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 705
Quote:
Originally Posted by grabby View Post
I didn't read that at all. Openly airing his disappointment with the current generation of the most iconic watch ever is not the same as stifling opposing views. Quite the opposite, actually.
the first reply on the 3rd page of this thread. somebody was questioning OP the purpose of this thread and OP replied.
hbk75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 12:01 PM   #79
fskywalker
2024 Pledge Member
 
fskywalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 24,602
5 series over 6 series
__________________
Francisco
♛ 16610 / 116264
Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 2230.50.00
Zenith 02.470.405
Henry Archer Eclipse

2FA security enabled
fskywalker is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 12:01 PM   #80
Etschell
"TRF" Member
 
Etschell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
I prefer the super case
__________________
If you wind it, they will run.

25 or 6 to 4.
Etschell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 01:02 PM   #81
mdubya
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Canada
Posts: 132
I own a 6 digit sub and a BLNR and am finally coming to the realization that I just cant deal with the maxi case. Its just too unaesthetic and blocky for a 10K watch. Terrible design choice on an otherwise perfect watch. Glidelock, maxi dial, ceramic bezel, all beautiful. But the lugs just ruin it for me. Which sucks because the bracelet is a joke on 5 digits but for us sub lovers the only other option is wait for rolex to release the 126610 which will undoubtedly have slimmer lugs, but that could be years and probably will be scarce as hell.
mdubya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 01:07 PM   #82
csaltphoto
"TRF" Member
 
csaltphoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: US
Watch: sub
Posts: 2,293
There will come a day when we fondly remember the slim and graceful lugs of the maxi case...

csaltphoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 01:25 PM   #84
ras47
"TRF" Member
 
ras47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Robert
Location: Northern NJ
Watch: 16710 BLRO
Posts: 3,063
I was surprised that when Rolex went Maxi and made the watches overall larger, the dial stayed exactly the same size. More bezel and more case, but not more dial. That was disappointing to me. I'd prefer a bigger watch, but not simply more bulk around the same display area.
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II BLRO 16710
Omega Speedmaster Co-Axial Chrono
ras47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 02:10 PM   #85
bob78h
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Real Name: Z
Location: Bay Area
Watch: 126610
Posts: 314
I'm not a fan but I think it depends on your wrist size too. I've seen some wrist shots from larger wristed members and it looks just fine, but on those of us with smaller wrists it doesn't look as proportional.
bob78h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 02:14 PM   #86
M45
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: East Bay Area
Posts: 551
Looks good on my gorilla wrists.
M45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 02:52 PM   #87
rcb
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 67
For the next revision, I would love the see the Submariner (and eventually the GMT Master and Explorer II) go to more tapered lugs. It happened with the Datejust. The SD43, though too large, is well proportioned. Thankfully, the Daytona lines have remained classic. Common Rolex, bring back a more sinewy Sub and GMT!
rcb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 02:58 PM   #88
Raza_actual
"TRF" Member
 
Raza_actual's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Philadelphia
Watch: Monaco
Posts: 391
You're clearly not alone, but I wholeheartedly disagree.

__________________
TAG Heuer Monaco LE|Omega Speedmaster|Tudor Ranger|Rolex Submariner
Raza_actual is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 10:07 PM   #89
nicon
"TRF" Member
 
nicon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Poland
Watch: 16610
Posts: 333
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbk75 View Post
Hope more people dislike the maxi cases so there will be stocks left at the ADs.
I hope same for 5 digit cases, so I'll be able to buy old Pepsi for a decent price.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdubya View Post
I own a 6 digit sub and a BLNR and am finally coming to the realization that I just cant deal with the maxi case. Its just too unaesthetic and blocky for a 10K watch. Terrible design choice on an otherwise perfect watch. Glidelock, maxi dial, ceramic bezel, all beautiful. But the lugs just ruin it for me. Which sucks because the bracelet is a joke on 5 digits but for us sub lovers the only other option is wait for rolex to release the 126610 which will undoubtedly have slimmer lugs, but that could be years and probably will be scarce as hell.
Or you can go third route and fit glidelock clasp to 5-digit bracelet and have best of both worlds

https://forums.watchuseek.com/f23/my...e-4501579.html

nicon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 10:47 PM   #90
rmlovett1
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
rmlovett1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Richard
Location: GA
Watch: YTBD
Posts: 22,491
Quote:
Originally Posted by s.m.b. View Post
Groundhog thread...

This list is not meant to be exhaustive.

⬆️⬆️⬆️ exactly! This has definitely been covered !

IMO...there’s plenty of diversity in the modern Rolex lineup for case shapes & lug sizes offered. There’s sport/professional models with....slimmer lugs, bigger cases, slimmer lugs smaller cases, super-case thicker lugs, and so on....
Not always easy to get, but the choices are there.
If you’re talking specifically “Submariner”, and you want slimmer lugs...then you’re left with one choice...non-ceramic.
All personal preference, no wrong opinions or answers IMO.
rmlovett1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.