The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex Reference Library

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 5 March 2012, 02:53 PM   #31
Nalk7
"TRF" Member
 
Nalk7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Miguel
Location: East Lansing MI
Watch: 114270,5508,124060
Posts: 562
Quote:
Originally Posted by aandrianto View Post
How about 16610 M series?, is it entirely 904L or not?
I'd say its not, all 114270 have 316 bracelets to my understanding, and it wasn't until the 214270 that the explorer became a all 904L watch.
Nalk7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2012, 03:01 PM   #32
Nalk7
"TRF" Member
 
Nalk7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Miguel
Location: East Lansing MI
Watch: 114270,5508,124060
Posts: 562
Quote:
Originally Posted by nim View Post
High nickel content in 904 may not be good for people with highly sensitive skin
Just wear it on a NATO no biggie
Nalk7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2013, 06:03 AM   #33
ec51
"TRF" Member
 
ec51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: DerekISeric
Location: FurtherOnUpTheRd.
Watch: yourself
Posts: 1,639
Thank you for this explanation.
__________________
.
.
.

Eric
ec51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2013, 07:29 AM   #34
3266
"TRF" Member
 
3266's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Dan
Location: London
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 125
Nickel content obviously too low 007
__________________
“By the way Mr. Bond. That’s a particular handsome wristwatch your wearing, may I see it?” – Mr. BIG AKA Kananga, Live and Let Die (1973)
3266 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2013, 07:37 AM   #35
laphroaig007
"TRF" Member
 
laphroaig007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Marc
Location: France
Watch: 116710 & PAM372
Posts: 1,019
Thanks for the nice and detailed explanation !
__________________
Always look on the bright side of life... Watch addict...
laphroaig007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2023, 10:39 PM   #36
Car32
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 361
Hi Larry, reviving an old post. Is pitting a concern in normal day-to-day usage for modern 904L Rolexes, even with the occasional pool swim and salt water swim without rinsing afterwards?

Have there been a noticeable number of cases with 904L pitting?

Thanks in advance.
Car32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2023, 01:50 AM   #37
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 42,991
Quote:
Originally Posted by Car32 View Post
Hi Larry, reviving an old post. Is pitting a concern in normal day-to-day usage for modern 904L Rolexes, even with the occasional pool swim and salt water swim without rinsing afterwards?

Have there been a noticeable number of cases with 904L pitting?

Thanks in advance.
904L Steel has much higher corrosion resistance than 316L stee;. There is also a better design with the o-ring channel and mating surfaces in newer models.

We should rinse after chlorine and salt water exposure because when it dries it leaves an abrasive film.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2023, 02:47 AM   #38
Car32
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 361
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
904L Steel has much higher corrosion resistance than 316L stee;. There is also a better design with the o-ring channel and mating surfaces in newer models.

We should rinse after chlorine and salt water exposure because when it dries it leaves an abrasive film.
Yes agree, but what I'd like to know is, how common is it for pitting to occur in 904L with "normal" usage where little to no time is spent in a pool or the sea and the watched is serviced regularly, lets say every 10 years?

Or is it rare enough that we shouldn't be worried about unless we're in the pool or in the sea on a regular basis and just really abusing our watches by not cleaning them periodically?
Car32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2023, 03:00 AM   #39
EEpro
2024 Pledge Member
 
EEpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Brad
Location: Purdue
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 9,084
904L - Worth It ??? Case back Corrosion.. in Laymans Terms.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Car32 View Post
Yes agree, but what I'd like to know is, how common is it for pitting to occur in 904L with "normal" usage where little to no time is spent in a pool or the sea and the watched is serviced regularly, lets say every 10 years?

Or is it rare enough that we shouldn't be worried about unless we're in the pool or in the sea on a regular basis?

It's not going to happen. It requires high concentrations of chemicals (including boiling in chlorides) to cause any damage to 904L.

Example case: It can be boiled in 26% sodium chloride solution for 1000 hours without stress corrosion cracking.

It's of no concern at all.
__________________
Ω
2FA Active
EEpro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2023, 12:54 PM   #40
Car32
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 361
Quote:
Originally Posted by EEpro View Post
It's not going to happen. It requires high concentrations of chemicals (including boiling in chlorides) to cause any damage to 904L.

Example case: It can be boiled in 26% sodium chloride solution for 1000 hours without stress corrosion cracking.

It's of no concern at all.
This is reassuring!
Car32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 March 2024, 03:44 AM   #41
Robf52
"TRF" Member
 
Robf52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Sunshine State
Watch: lots of Rolex
Posts: 4,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
I was recently asked... "Why did my 904L Stainless Steel watch pit inside the case back... I thought that 904L was immune to corrosion"

Well, the answer is complicated... but bare with me..

Stainless Steel is corrosion resistant because it forms it's own protective coating.. The Chromium content binds with Oxygen and forms a protective and invisible skin of Chromium Oxide, and this is difficult for the corrosive (rusting) affects of water to penetrate..

At the case back, we have a rubber gasket... This gasket flexes and creates movement, expansion/contraction, vibration, etc.; the gasket actually rubs off that film of chromium oxide protection where it touches..

So........ as we sweat, we provide the perfect electrolyte...salt water. Further, we secrete minerals and metals that mix with atmospheric contaminants as well....... we now have the perfect formula for some galvanic corrosion and normal corrosion to take place. As the salt water from our body seeps into and around the gasket, along with the body metals/minerals etc.... we have a soup just waiting to attack the metal when the rubber gasket rubs off that protective film... Electrolyte is also more active at higher temperatures...say body temps of almost 100 degrees.. Some folks also sweat a more acidic solution than others...

So, corrosion and pitting is always more likely to be found at points where the metals natural protective oxide coating is rubbed off and the elements are there to attack the now vulnerable bare metal....around the case-back O-ring..

Another good reason to give your watch a good cleaning periodically to remove that acidic electrolyte solution that has settled around the case-back O-ring..

Let's look at some of the common types of Stainless Steel:

Early Rolex cases were made from the 304L Stainless, commonly referred to as 18/8 Stainless and used in the medical and food industries. 304 Stainless is the most common stainless steel used:

304L blend:
AISI Type 304L is an Austenitic Standard grade Stainless Steel. It is commonly called AISI Type 304L Chromium-Nickel steel. It is composed of (in weight percentage) 0.03% Carbon (C), 2.00% Manganese (Mn), 1.00% Silicon (Si), 18.0-20.0% Chromium (Cr), 8.0-12.0% Nickel (Ni), 0.045% Phosphorus (P), 0.03% Sulfur (S), and the base metal Iron (Fe). Other designations of AISI Type 304L stainless steel include UNS S30403 and AISI 304L.
304L is commonly referred to as surgical grade stainless..


316L blend:
AISI Type 316L is an Austenitic Standard grade Stainless Steel. It is commonly called AISI Type 316L Chromium-Nickel steel. It is composed of (in weight percentage) 0.03% Carbon (C), 2.00% Manganese (Mn), 1.00% Silicon (Si), 16.0-18.0% Chromium (Cr), 10.0-14.0% Nickel (Ni), 0.045% Phosphorus (P), 0.03% Sulfur (S), 2.0-3.0% Molybdenum (Mo), and the base metal Iron (Fe). Other designations of AISI Type 316L stainless steel include UNS S31603 and AISI 316L.

You can see that the Chromium content is increased and the Molybdenum % is increased to inhibit corrosion is the passive film (chromium oxide) is removed... this grade is sometimes referred to as "marine grade" stainless

316F blend:
AISI Type 316F is an Austenitic Standard grade Stainless Steel. It is commonly called AISI Type 316F Chromium-Nickel steel. It is composed of (in weight percentage) 0.08% Carbon (C), 2.00% Manganese (Mn), 1.00% Silicon (Si), 16.0-18.0% Chromium (Cr), 10.0-14.0% Nickel (Ni), 0.2% Phosphorus (P), 0.10%(min) Sulfur (S), 1.75-2.5% Molybdenum (Mo), and the base metal Iron (Fe). Other designations of AISI Type 316F stainless steel include UNS S31620 and AISI 316F.

So it appears that 316L (Low carbon) has less carbon, higher % molybdenum - and this molybdenum is what provides it with more anti-corrosion ability..

this compares with 904L:

904L is an Austenitic Nonstandard grade Stainless Steel. It is composed of (in weight percentage) 0.02% Carbon (C), 2.00% Manganese (Mn), 1.00% Silicon (Si), 19.0-23.0% Chromium (Cr), 23.0-28.0% Nickel (Ni), 0.045% Phosphorus (P), 0.035% Sulfur (S), 4.0-5.0% Molybdenum (Mo), 1.0-2.0% Copper (Cu), and the base metal Iron (Fe). Other designations of 904L stainless steel include UNS N08904 and ASTM B625.

this contains even more Molybdenum for corrosion inhibition, higher chromium content (for the chromium oxide, a passive film that immediately forms to protect the metal from corrosion), and more nickel which is highly polishable...
One of the best, most informative posts I've read. Thanks for the education.
__________________
126610LV//116508 Daytona YG Black/Champagne
116655 YM40 Everose Oysterflex//126622 YM40 Blue//126600 SD43
126710BLNR//126711CHNR
126334 DJ41 Rhodium/Diamonds//126331 DJ41 TT Wimbledon
124300 OP41 Green//126334 DJ41 White/Romans
Robf52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2024, 06:44 AM   #42
fsprow
"TRF" Member
 
fsprow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Real Name: Frank
Location: Dallas,NY,Colo.
Watch: Patek 5168, 5170P
Posts: 2,364
Quote:
Originally Posted by EEpro View Post
It's not going to happen. It requires high concentrations of chemicals (including boiling in chlorides) to cause any damage to 904L.

Example case: It can be boiled in 26% sodium chloride solution for 1000 hours without stress corrosion cracking.

It's of no concern at all.
100% correct. Materials Science background here. There is NO advantage to 904 over 316 except when exposed to very concentrated industrial acids, certainly not sweat. Just advertising.
fsprow is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.