ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

breitlings · 14 July 2017, 06:29 AM

I like the zenith black and white dial.

JP Chestnut · 14 July 2017, 06:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JR16

Unless you are sticking it in a safe for 10-20 years, i would buy the one you like better viscerally.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Smart advice. I picked a thin hand version of the previous reference. It seemed to be the best mix of zenith model looks and modern updates. Eventually I'll own all three.

breitlings · 14 July 2017, 06:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lopez784

I can understand your choice but the hardware (clasp and bracelet) are weak for my taste on the Zenith.
The improvement on the quality of their clasp and oyster is very considerable since the Rolex movement.

16518

dr35mm · 14 July 2017, 08:02 AM

Thats the beauty of SS Daytona, there's absolutely no wrong choice!! Any SS daytona is a bulletproof choice.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

904VT · 14 July 2017, 08:04 AM

IMO the last gen is much more capable of dressing up than the Ceramic. It depends where you want this Daytona to fit in your collection. Don't get me wrong though, love them both.

vkl · 14 July 2017, 10:19 AM

I currently own both and I prefer the ceramic.

H_tony11 · 14 July 2017, 11:03 AM

I'd say go for ceramic. At least thats my opinion. Sold my ss daytona with the aim of getting the ceramic one.
The bezel on the ss is a scratch magnet. Its fine for some people but not me and thats one of the reason sold it.

Kevan · 15 July 2017, 04:18 AM

zama · 15 July 2017, 11:07 AM

I paid near the same money for a spotless WG Daytona with a more interesting dial than a ceramic Daytona. More than anything I am happy to be different to many. I don't think there is a bad one so enjoy, I just cannot get my hear around paying $1,000's over retail or waiting a lifetime to get one...... but to each his own. Sorry not a great picture up close, but I now have to go back through my old photos as downsize them, so need to send them from computer to phone, resize on app and send back to computer.

zama · 15 July 2017, 11:29 AM

This is a better one just taken,it is different to many, more sporty less dressy, but similar price to SS Ceramic new.

locutus49 · 15 July 2017, 11:36 AM

Buy the newest model you can afford, unless you are going vintage. With vintage, get the best example available. Same with Porsches, buy the newest model you can afford, unless you want vintage.

kcmo · 15 July 2017, 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zama

I paid near the same money for a spotless WG Daytona with a more interesting dial than a ceramic Daytona. More than anything I am happy to be different to many. I don't think there is a bad one so enjoy, I just cannot get my hear around paying $1,000's over retail or waiting a lifetime to get one...... but to each his own. Sorry not a great picture up close, but I now have to go back through my old photos as downsize them, so need to send them from computer to phone, resize on app and send back to computer.

A match made in heaven!!!! Stunning pair

I'd love a RG Daytona someday to pair with my 116520!

KBM · 15 July 2017, 12:33 PM

I initially thought I would let one of the 116520s go, but I can't bring myself to do it. They all have different personalities and are a joy to wear.

eco8gator · 15 July 2017, 12:44 PM

A steel Daytona always seems to be a safe bet (not 2 tone, not gold). If you can somehow get a ceramic at the MSRP that would be my first choice, my second would be a Zenith Daytona and the third would be the modern non ceramic...oh there is a 4th Daytona option but only if I win the lottery...

No one can predict the future on value though the steel daytona seems to be a safe bet for now:) Buy it because you like it.

Chute · 15 July 2017, 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dave023

Get the white 116520 or the black 116500

My thoughts exactly

AS1 · 15 July 2017, 01:27 PM

Ceramic just pops more IMO

Chute · 15 July 2017, 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cigarlvr07

It's about time that someone posts a pic that doesn't take up the whole screen

ratty · 15 July 2017, 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zama

This is a better one just taken,it is different to many, more sporty less dressy, but similar price to SS Ceramic new.

Beautiful watch, congratulations

AJMarcus · 16 July 2017, 03:35 AM

Go classic 116520. After the euphoria dies down for the ceramics you can easily flip it for. A Daytona c if you so choose. The 116520s are skyrocketing in value right now so the sooner you pick one up the better. Hers mine...

thekwaze · 3 August 2017, 03:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Passionata

What is the exact model number for this beauty?

Passionata · 3 August 2017, 04:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thekwaze

What is the exact model number for this beauty?

116520 Rolex Daytona SS fitted with a Black White Arab Dial

aka Tom Kristensen Daytona

thekwaze · 3 August 2017, 04:15 AM

Personally I love the new ceramic bezel version....but I also love the 16520 that I own.
I would swap it for a ceramic if it was possible!
I would attach a photo showing a comparison between my 16520, my Zenith De Luca and my 14060M but I haven't got a clue what it means asking for the URL of my image??
The De Luca probably attracts the most compliments, which some may find surprising and the 14060M the least, but each to his or her own....If someone can explain what the URL malarkey is I'll upload a photo.

thekwaze · 3 August 2017, 04:16 AM

Passionata - Thanks for the info....I'm tempted!

Passionata · 3 August 2017, 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thekwaze

Personally I love the new ceramic bezel version....but I also love the 16520 that I own.
I would swap it for a ceramic if it was possible!
I would attach a photo showing a comparison between my 16520, my Zenith De Luca and my 14060M but I haven't got a clue what it means asking for the URL of my image??
The De Luca probably attracts the most compliments, which some may find surprising and the 14060M the least, but each to his or her own....If someone can explain what the URL malarkey is I'll upload a photo.

Upload your pic into google pics,etc ,open the pic in your browser ,right click on the pic ,copy the link and paste .
Or take pix with your iphone ,download tapatalk and upload the pix from your phone into your answer(it wirks with android too)

Seaward · 4 August 2017, 01:02 AM

Both are great. Love my 116520.

Kenrocks · 13 September 2017, 02:23 AM

Tough choice ... so I got both :)

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

GolfPunk · 13 September 2017, 02:39 AM

Both stunnng

ratty · 13 September 2017, 02:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kenrocks

Tough choice ... so I got both :)

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I much prefer the earlier 16520 of the two.

bananabread100 · 13 September 2017, 02:58 AM

It's just an updated bezel but they're very different watches. Justifiable owning both, but i prefer the 116520 by a very small margin

dardeca · 13 September 2017, 05:07 AM

I prefer the Ceramic model based on looks and how it holds up as a daily wearer, but you can't go wrong with either.

However, if you really want to get a cool Daytona, try and source a 6263 or 6265!!

14 July 2017, 08:02 AM	#64
dr35mm "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2016 Real Name: Peter Location: Caribbean Watch: BB58 Posts: 2,398	Thats the beauty of SS Daytona, there's absolutely no wrong choice!! Any SS daytona is a bulletproof choice. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ Present: BB58 \| BB36 \| GMW-B5000D-1JF \| 6900-PT80 Past: 16610LN \| 16622 \| 116610LN \| 214270

14 July 2017, 11:03 AM	#67
H_tony11 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Tony Location: Sydney Posts: 186	I'd say go for ceramic. At least thats my opinion. Sold my ss daytona with the aim of getting the ceramic one. The bezel on the ss is a scratch magnet. Its fine for some people but not me and thats one of the reason sold it. __________________ Current watches: Hulk, 16710 Pepsi, seiko Blumo SBDC003, Omega Bond Blue, Datejust, SARB035, Seiko SNP065, G-Shock, Aqua Terra Blue Bond Past watches: GMT2C, Daytona Black, Planet Ocean Seamaster, Datejust, 116610ln

4 August 2017, 01:02 AM	#85
Seaward "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Real Name: Charles Location: New York Posts: 607	Both are great. Love my 116520. __________________ 14060M 116520 116300 116710BLNR 116500LN

13 September 2017, 02:39 AM	#87
GolfPunk "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: Gary Location: UK Watch: WG Daytona Posts: 4,395	Both stunnng __________________ ♕ Rolex DateJust 1601 Buckley Birth Year 1972 ♕ Breitling Chronomat 47 mm GMT Limited

14 July 2017, 06:29 AM	#61
breitlings Banned Join Date: Jul 2014 Location: Bethesda Watch: Apple TV Posts: 5,744	I like the zenith black and white dial.

14 July 2017, 10:19 AM	#66
vkl "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Real Name: Vince Location: California Watch: Rolex and Pams Posts: 59	I currently own both and I prefer the ceramic.

15 July 2017, 04:18 AM	#68
Kevan "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: England/Dubai Watch: the one on my arm. Posts: 923

15 July 2017, 11:36 AM	#71
locutus49 Banned Join Date: May 2014 Real Name: John Location: La Jolla, CA Watch: Platona Posts: 12,194	Buy the newest model you can afford, unless you are going vintage. With vintage, get the best example available. Same with Porsches, buy the newest model you can afford, unless you want vintage.

15 July 2017, 12:33 PM	#73
KBM 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: K. Location: 780 Posts: 10,390	I initially thought I would let one of the 116520s go, but I can't bring myself to do it. They all have different personalities and are a joy to wear.

15 July 2017, 12:44 PM	#74
eco8gator "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2013 Location: Florida Watch: 5060/a Posts: 1,119	A steel Daytona always seems to be a safe bet (not 2 tone, not gold). If you can somehow get a ceramic at the MSRP that would be my first choice, my second would be a Zenith Daytona and the third would be the modern non ceramic...oh there is a 4th Daytona option but only if I win the lottery... No one can predict the future on value though the steel daytona seems to be a safe bet for now:) Buy it because you like it.

15 July 2017, 01:27 PM	#76
AS1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2014 Location: NYC / Milan Watch: 6263 Posts: 3,938	Ceramic just pops more IMO

3 August 2017, 04:15 AM	#82
thekwaze "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: UK Watch: 1946 Breitling Posts: 64	Personally I love the new ceramic bezel version....but I also love the 16520 that I own. I would swap it for a ceramic if it was possible! I would attach a photo showing a comparison between my 16520, my Zenith De Luca and my 14060M but I haven't got a clue what it means asking for the URL of my image?? The De Luca probably attracts the most compliments, which some may find surprising and the 14060M the least, but each to his or her own....If someone can explain what the URL malarkey is I'll upload a photo.

3 August 2017, 04:16 AM	#83
thekwaze "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: UK Watch: 1946 Breitling Posts: 64	Passionata - Thanks for the info....I'm tempted!

13 September 2017, 02:23 AM	#86
Kenrocks "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2017 Location: Hong Kong Posts: 350	Tough choice ... so I got both :) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

13 September 2017, 02:58 AM	#89
bananabread100 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Location: Manila Watch: Rolex Explorer I Posts: 30	It's just an updated bezel but they're very different watches. Justifiable owning both, but i prefer the 116520 by a very small margin

13 September 2017, 05:07 AM	#90
dardeca 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: US Watch: Rolex, Patek Posts: 2,446	I prefer the Ceramic model based on looks and how it holds up as a daily wearer, but you can't go wrong with either. However, if you really want to get a cool Daytona, try and source a 6263 or 6265!!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)