The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 9 August 2011, 07:26 PM   #1
brissleboy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Bristol
Posts: 7
Sea Dweller purchase advice required

Hi everyone, first post here so go easy on me!

I'm in the market for a Sea Dweller (16600) but can't believe how much they appear to have gone up in price since they were discontinued! I have been offered a couple and would appreciate some feedback as to whether they would be a good purchase or not:

'Y' series, £4.3k
'D' series £4.5k

Both include full papers and have just been serviced.

I really wanted an M series (last one I believe) but these seem to be even more expensive...

I am based in the UK.

Any feedback would be greatly appreciated

Cheers
brissleboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 August 2011, 07:38 PM   #2
colin hill
"TRF" Member
 
colin hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: uk
Watch: Date just 116234
Posts: 40
Time to buy

I believe this watch will only continue to rise in value as with all other discontinued models, sub, gmt, etc.They are very robust models, Just check it hasn't been over polished before you buy as there are a few of these out there at the moment demanding high prices, as i have seen,the condition has not been that great.
__________________
colin hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 August 2011, 07:49 PM   #3
Jason71
"TRF" Member
 
Jason71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
Quote:
Originally Posted by brissleboy View Post
Hi everyone, first post here so go easy on me!

I'm in the market for a Sea Dweller (16600) but can't believe how much they appear to have gone up in price since they were discontinued! I have been offered a couple and would appreciate some feedback as to whether they would be a good purchase or not:

'Y' series, £4.3k
'D' series £4.5k

Both include full papers and have just been serviced.

I really wanted an M series (last one I believe) but these seem to be even more expensive...

I am based in the UK.

Any feedback would be greatly appreciated

Cheers
Assuming both are in similar condition and still have nice, crisp lugs etc.................

I would get the Y-serial since it has drilled-through lugs. I can't speak to whether or not that is a good price since you are UK based, but it seems fair since the watch was just serviced. I can tell you that the prices are not going to decrease. I bought an A-serial just a couple years ago for $3,200 with box/papers in really decent shape.
__________________
Best Regards,
Jason


Just Say "NO" to Polishing
Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons
LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches
PLEXI IS SEXY
Jason71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 August 2011, 08:01 PM   #4
Clay
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Up a tree
Posts: 4,001
I agree with Jason...Get the Y series......You gotta have lug holes...

Here's my Y series....Good luck..

Clay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 August 2011, 08:05 PM   #5
brissleboy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Bristol
Posts: 7
Bit of a novice question but the drilled lugs being the 'holes' above and below the helium escape valve? Are these better to have then?

Cheers for the reply guys!
brissleboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 August 2011, 08:07 PM   #6
Paulie 50
"TRF" Member
 
Paulie 50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lancs. England
Posts: 993
Quote:
Originally Posted by brissleboy View Post
Hi everyone, first post here so go easy on me!

I'm in the market for a Sea Dweller (16600) but can't believe how much they appear to have gone up in price since they were discontinued! I have been offered a couple and would appreciate some feedback as to whether they would be a good purchase or not:

'Y' series, £4.3k
'D' series £4.5k

Both include full papers and have just been serviced.

I really wanted an M series (last one I believe) but these seem to be even more expensive...

I am based in the UK.

Any feedback would be greatly appreciated

Cheers
Buy the lug holed model, you won't regret it, and, as previous posters have stated, the SD is only going to rise in price. Buy and enjoy.
Paulie 50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 August 2011, 08:43 PM   #7
Clay
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Up a tree
Posts: 4,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by brissleboy View Post
Bit of a novice question but the drilled lugs being the 'holes' above and below the helium escape valve? Are these better to have then?

Cheers for the reply guys!
Yes, those are the lug holes......"Better" is a relative term.....

Some people like them and some do not...It's personal preference really...

The lug holes speak more to the "old school", the Sea Dweller as it originally was (1665).....It also makes it much easier to take the bracelet off and exchange it for a NATO strap for example.....

Either way the Sea Dweller is a great watch...
Clay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 August 2011, 08:46 PM   #8
Numismatist
"TRF" Member
 
Numismatist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Chris
Location: Camden ME & STT
Watch: 116600
Posts: 6,350
Given that both of your samples are almost the same price, I'd go with the lug hole version.
__________________
Rolex 116600 Sea-dweller
Montblanc Solitaire Doué Black & White Legrand FP
Montblanc Solitaire Doué Black & White RB
Montblanc Meisterstück Diamond Mozart BP
Montblanc Meisterstück Mozart BP
Numismatist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 August 2011, 09:14 PM   #9
brissleboy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Bristol
Posts: 7
The choice seems to only be heading in one direction then... I am guessing that the Y series SDs must be the last with lug holes?

What must the watch come included with, can somebody point me in the direction of a checklist?

Cheers
brissleboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 August 2011, 09:15 PM   #10
dddrees
"TRF" Member
 
dddrees's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,251
Quote:
Originally Posted by numismatist View Post
given that both of your samples are almost the same price, i'd go with the lug hole version.
x2
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion.

Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation.

Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of
Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
dddrees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 August 2011, 09:27 PM   #11
dricig
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Dave
Location: NY Metro
Posts: 678
Good luck with the search, that's the fun part!
Both are similar in price and have full papers which is important but condition is the big deal. I see a bunch for sale that are overly polished, this is evident on the HEV (Helium Escape Valve) side with rounded HEV edges and polished HEV.
As for price, the best time to buy is the present since prices will continue to rise.
Lug holes or not? well, not that big a deal except that non hole is a newer watch. In a few years when the SD is vintage, the non hole version, having been made in far fewer numbers, may actually be preferred.
Collectors are a fickle lot!

dave
dricig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 August 2011, 09:29 PM   #12
Clay
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Up a tree
Posts: 4,001
Yes, Y series was the last year with Lug Holes.....
In fact there were only 4 years that the Sea Dweller had Lug Holes and a Luminova dial....
A,P,K & Y series.
Clay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 August 2011, 10:16 PM   #13
S52
"TRF" Member
 
S52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: FL230
Watch: me fly-by
Posts: 789
Its crazy how much the SD has appreciated over the summer... before i left for my deployment in May nice ones with box and papers seemed to hover around the 5k mark... now those are fetching 6k+ only 3 months later... I should have squeezed the trigger on one before I left... still have a few weeks to wait till I get home to make a deal
S52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 August 2011, 10:25 PM   #14
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,266
Quote:
Originally Posted by brissleboy View Post
Hi everyone, first post here so go easy on me!

I'm in the market for a Sea Dweller (16600) but can't believe how much they appear to have gone up in price since they were discontinued! I have been offered a couple and would appreciate some feedback as to whether they would be a good purchase or not:

'Y' series, £4.3k
'D' series £4.5k

Both include full papers and have just been serviced.

I really wanted an M series (last one I believe) but these seem to be even more expensive...

I am based in the UK.

Any feedback would be greatly appreciated

Cheers
Well as both watches have been serviced the case stamp is mostly irrelevant.As we all should know Rolex watches in general are good for 50 plus years no matter what the case stamp is.These case stamps are only a rough estimate when a case was stamped anyway.And in reality they are much like any other serial on any product we buy.But with Rolex today many think this case stamp is the most important which its not condition of watch is.Now with models like the 16600 SD its not changed a lot since introduction in 1988/9.The changes are hardly worth a mention let me see the non lug hole case started to appear around late 2002 early 2003.Then we had a LEC crystal plus a few minor fonts and thats about it.So the SD had quite a long run and all basically the same except for the case stamps and a few very minor cosmetic details.Perhaps in 20-30 years the lug hole ones might get a slight premium. But the SD in any form would not be on a must have list for any serious Rolex watch collector far to many around IMHO buy the cheapest one.There is much Internet hype about the SD value yes perhaps there has been a increase. But thats only to those willing to pay hoping to make a fast buck, but would doubt if prices will hold the SD is not a rare watch much like the other modern day Rolex watches.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 August 2011, 11:18 PM   #15
brissleboy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Bristol
Posts: 7
I am not looking for my purchase to be an investment per se as it will be a daily wearer, I just want to make sure I'm not paying over the odds for something. Obviously, if some years down the road it was worth what I paid for it then that would be an added bonus!

If they only used Luminova dials for 4 years, what did they use before and now - Tritium? Don't they lose their luminescence over a period of time?

I am swayed towards the lug hole model as it is a little more 'retro', if that is the right word!
brissleboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 August 2011, 11:27 PM   #16
landroverking
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
I would go with the cheaper one.
As far as collectors go. People collect Subs, there are fewer SDs.
landroverking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 August 2011, 11:29 PM   #17
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,266
Quote:
Originally Posted by brissleboy View Post
I am not looking for my purchase to be an investment per se as it will be a daily wearer, I just want to make sure I'm not paying over the odds for something. Obviously, if some years down the road it was worth what I paid for it then that would be an added bonus!

If they only used Luminova dials for 4 years, what did they use before and now - Tritium? Don't they lose their luminescence over a period of time?

I am swayed towards the lug hole model as it is a little more 'retro', if that is the right word!
They changed over from the Tritium type dials around 1998 on all Rolex models now they had a lume life of around 12 years.From 1998 on they use Luminover or now Superluminover and whatever fancy name Rolex wants to call it.Now this lume glow should last the life time of the watch, like I said in my post because both watches have been serviced buy the cheapest.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 August 2011, 12:01 AM   #18
SWIMPRUF
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: *
Posts: 2,323
Y series.
__________________
Member# 52,675 Est. 3/2011
SWIMPRUF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 August 2011, 02:51 AM   #19
Ski Dweller
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Aspen, CO
Watch: Swatch KikiPicasso
Posts: 266
I wear my as a "daily" and each time I visit an AD, they see the watch and tell me to put it in a safe and stop wearing it. Sorry, but it isn't worth that much and I'll be long gone before it EVER has a chance of being the Paul Newman Daytona or any such thing. The Sea Dweller would have to head north of $45000 for me to "put it in a safe". I presume that won't be happening. I don't put $45000 cars in a safe. In fact, I go off road with them and beat them up. You can't get much in the way of decent SUV for under $45000. So, Im not sure what all the hubub is about.
Ski Dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 August 2011, 09:40 PM   #20
brissleboy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Bristol
Posts: 7
Just want to say a big thank you to those that have contributed to this thread, I really appreciate it! Looking to move on the purchase within the next day or so.

Cheers everyone!
brissleboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 August 2011, 11:28 PM   #21
Sky-Dweller
"TRF" Member
 
Sky-Dweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Alin
Location: Italy
Posts: 604
The last production serial of the SD was V not M.
Sky-Dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 August 2011, 11:41 PM   #22
cdnwatchguy
"TRF" Member
 
cdnwatchguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 921
chiming in

I prefer the lug holes myself so I would suggest the Y. As everyone else has said, the price isn't going down. Here's my K serial.
__________________
Keith
cdnwatchguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2011, 02:02 AM   #23
brissleboy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Bristol
Posts: 7
The deal is done, should take delivery in approximately 7 days! I am pleased as punch, looks like I'll be hanging up my Omega Speedmaster sometime soon...!!
brissleboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2011, 02:21 AM   #24
Numismatist
"TRF" Member
 
Numismatist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Chris
Location: Camden ME & STT
Watch: 116600
Posts: 6,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by brissleboy View Post
The deal is done, should take delivery in approximately 7 days! I am pleased as punch, looks like I'll be hanging up my Omega Speedmaster sometime soon...!!
Congrats! Which one
__________________
Rolex 116600 Sea-dweller
Montblanc Solitaire Doué Black & White Legrand FP
Montblanc Solitaire Doué Black & White RB
Montblanc Meisterstück Diamond Mozart BP
Montblanc Meisterstück Mozart BP
Numismatist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2011, 02:30 AM   #25
cdnwatchguy
"TRF" Member
 
cdnwatchguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 921
Dan't hang up the Speedy for too long

Quote:
Originally Posted by brissleboy View Post
The deal is done, should take delivery in approximately 7 days! I am pleased as punch, looks like I'll be hanging up my Omega Speedmaster sometime soon...!!
A Sea Dweller and Speedmaster makes the perfect pair. A complete collection really.
__________________
Keith
cdnwatchguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2011, 02:38 AM   #26
nauticajoe
"TRF" Member
 
nauticajoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
Either way, you will be owning one of the best diver watches out there.

Good luck!



---
- Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
nauticajoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2011, 07:28 AM   #27
brissleboy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Bristol
Posts: 7
Went for the Y series, prefer the lug holes too! A good day, a good result!
brissleboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2011, 08:16 AM   #28
Cabaiguan
"TRF" Member
 
Cabaiguan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Raf
Location: NJ
Watch: GMTII
Posts: 2,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdnwatchguy View Post
A Sea Dweller and Speedmaster makes the perfect pair. A complete collection really.
Totally agree. These two watches are very complimentary and they don't break the bank.
Cabaiguan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2011, 09:00 AM   #29
mrbill2mrbill2
"TRF" Member
 
mrbill2mrbill2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Mr. Bill
Location: South Florida
Watch: 16610
Posts: 6,148
Quote:
Originally Posted by S52 View Post
Its crazy how much the SD has appreciated over the summer... before i left for my deployment in May nice ones with box and papers seemed to hover around the 5k mark... now those are fetching 6k+ only 3 months later... I should have squeezed the trigger on one before I left... still have a few weeks to wait till I get home to make a deal
S52

Good hearing from you. Good luck on your SD acquisition.

And, thank you for your service to our country and its citizens.

__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of the Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons - ID # 13
mrbill2mrbill2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.