ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
3 May 2014, 07:40 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 365
|
Self Regulating my Daytona
My watch loses a few seconds a day which is within COSC standards. However, the cumulative effect over weeks can results in minutes lost. I have been manually adjusting the time whenever the watch is more than a minute off. My understanding is that the position of the watch will affect the time gained/lost. In other words, some positions will result in more time lost vs other positions where the time may gain. Is there a way for me to position my watch each night when I am not wearing it so I reduce the amount of time lost? I figure if some days the watch gains a few seconds and other days it loses a few seconds then in the course of a week the net effect will be OK because there will be offsets occurring.
Thanks in advance |
3 May 2014, 07:48 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Martin
Location: Netherlands
Watch: The Rolex Way
Posts: 1,471
|
__________________
114060 - 116520 - 126334 |
3 May 2014, 08:13 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 365
|
I don't see that in my Rolex manual. I got my Daytona in Summer 2013 and that screenshot looks like a copy from an older manual. Does it still apply to my model?
|
3 May 2014, 08:19 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
|
It's a mechanical watch, it will never be "perfect".
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man. |
3 May 2014, 09:49 AM | #5 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,050
|
Quote:
Not really. The faster beat movements do adjust just like the older ones, but a few percent change on a 28,800 beat vs. the older 15,500 beat movements is almost not noticeable.. What I would like is for most folks to get this "it runs within COSC" out of their system. That is a test, not what you should expect from your watch. If it's more than a couple of seconds a day, get it regulated. It doesn't cost very much or can be done under warranty if you aren't happy..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
3 May 2014, 11:13 AM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
|
Quote:
You aren't related to "MrDaytona" by any chance?! |
|
3 May 2014, 11:35 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 365
|
|
3 May 2014, 11:42 AM | #8 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,736
|
Being +/- 6 seconds a day is good enough for me. A minute lost in about 2 weeks won't kill me.
When asked for the current time, I've never said "It's Eleven Twenty-Seven and Thirty-Two and Three-Fifths seconds. My typical answer would be, "It's about 11:30"
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
8 May 2014, 02:42 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 53
|
Hmm... I say that +/-6 sec is horrible for any watch in that price range. Even the least expensive watch I had, which was old omega constellation would barely gain 1 sec in 24 hours. These days even Chinese $90 Seagull 2824 can be regulated to +2 sec a day. There is absolutely to excuse for any Rolex to be worse then 1.5 sec a day.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.