ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

gyro · 22 March 2017, 09:27 AM

So everyone seems to be saying here and on CWC ---> Nice watch with wrong hands at a good starter price of around $5000 with In house movement BUT not enough goods to sell this watch to speedy lovers
That is what I am getting ?

MickCollins1916 · 22 March 2017, 09:35 AM

Not a fan.

speedmaster73 · 22 March 2017, 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gyro

So everyone seems to be saying here and on CWC ---> Nice watch with wrong hands at a good starter price of around $5000 with In house movement BUT not enough goods to sell this watch to speedy lovers
That is what I am getting ?

please don't ever mention this monstrosity again in the same sentence of an omega speedmaster

lol. jokes.

AK797 · 22 March 2017, 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdmorenot

I like this, I wonder if the diameter is smaller. This would be KILLER at 38mm

Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk

Is that black or blue dial?

cdmorenot · 22 March 2017, 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AK797

Is that black or blue dial?

I'm wondering the same. I see blue ..

Quote:

Originally Posted by Speed

Passorama.

The clash of round plots and snowflake hand is a turnoff...as is the date at 6 o'clock.

Woof

Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk

Hairdude1 · 22 March 2017, 09:53 AM

No thank you

astewartconst · 22 March 2017, 10:00 AM

Nope

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ivanos · 22 March 2017, 10:19 AM

For me Tudor is trying to leverage its recent success in Black Bay line and take a further step to get more market with the chrono. Similar rationale can be seen for the BB 36 introduced last year. I am fine with the BB36. But the chrono with 200m of diving depth? A design confusion for me. Tudor shall try to build a classic pure chrono line, like Daytona.

Etschell · 22 March 2017, 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdmorenot

I like this, I wonder if the diameter is smaller. This would be KILLER at 38mm

Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk

I like it

v6inspire · 22 March 2017, 10:33 AM

not feeling the thickness of it..

cervantes · 22 March 2017, 10:40 AM

Dive watch dial and hands - steel tachymetere bezel. Hmmm....
Much prefer the heritage chrono models. Just put the new in house movement in those.

sickened1 · 22 March 2017, 10:43 AM

Easy pass... now on to the next Baselworld.

rossi46 · 22 March 2017, 10:44 AM

It looks ridiculously thick! And, as others have said, the design is a mishmash of styles and genres that ends up failing in the end. First strikeout by Tudor in a while, I have to say.

Love the nickname Baytona, though!

bdex75 · 22 March 2017, 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rossi46

It looks ridiculously thick! And, as others have said, the design is a mishmash of styles and genres that ends up failing in the end. First strikeout by Tudor in a while, I have to say.

Love the nickname Baytona, though!

Was wondering this on the thickness as well. My THC may be a modular but at least it isn't 2" thick. Not sold on this one but an in house column wheel integrated chrono at $4750 on a strap and $5050 on a bracelet is pretty incredible. Just hope the thickness is a photo trick.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Etschell · 22 March 2017, 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bdex75

Was wondering this on the thickness as well. My THC may be a modular but at least it isn't 2" thick. Not sold on this one but an in house column wheel integrated chrono at $4750 on a strap and $5050 on a bracelet is pretty incredible. Just hope the thickness is a photo trick.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I much prefer the thc or blackshield. I just don't like the big crown or hands on this model.

bdex75 · 22 March 2017, 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Etschell

I much prefer the thc or blackshield. I just don't like the big crown or hands on this model.

That minute hand just keeps going and going and going and going.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

GMT Aviator · 22 March 2017, 11:01 AM

Totally uninspiring. I really wish Tudor would ditch the snowflake hand. It ruins what would otherwise be a nice line-up of watches, but this chrono simply seems to lack any personality. You'd really think they'd do some customer research on the QT before making releases like this. Shame.

travisb · 22 March 2017, 11:07 AM

No interest..,

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

JohnnyNoDate · 22 March 2017, 11:26 AM

Would of loved this with a diving bezel!

Diver Chronos are already contradictory, and I wouldn't have minded the large snowflake hands over the subdials in that case.

This dial screams diver, but the tachy bezel confuses it...

Springfield · 22 March 2017, 11:27 AM

Yikes.

GB-man · 22 March 2017, 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GMT Aviator

Totally uninspiring. I really wish Tudor would ditch the snowflake hand. It ruins what would otherwise be a nice line-up of watches, but this chrono simply seems to lack any personality. You'd really think they'd do some customer research on the QT before making releases like this. Shame.

Agreed except on the pelagos where it makes sense with the square plots.

Bigsykedaddy · 22 March 2017, 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wb55

Doesn't matter because the snowflake hour hand probably blocks that too.

That's the first thing I noticed too. If it had thin hands I would like this

Quote:

Originally Posted by GMT Aviator

Totally uninspiring. I really wish Tudor would ditch the snowflake hand. It ruins what would otherwise be a nice line-up of watches, but this chrono simply seems to lack any personality. You'd really think they'd do some customer research on the QT before making releases like this. Shame.

I agree with this. There are many Tudor models I would be interested in if it weren't for the snowflake hand. I know it's their trademark but still.

teo · 22 March 2017, 11:41 AM

Wonder is the movement modular?

ivanos · 22 March 2017, 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by teo

Wonder is the movement modular?

the watch looks so thick i guess it's another modular chrono movement which if really so is another disappointment.

douglasf13 · 22 March 2017, 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ivanos

the watch looks so thick i guess it's another modular chrono movement which if really so is another disappointment.

Apparently column wheel, fwiw: http://watchesbysjx.com/2017/03/firs...ay-chrono.html

jrwilkes81 · 22 March 2017, 11:53 AM

nooooo

ragingcao · 22 March 2017, 11:55 AM

The only positive about this Tudor is my bank account won't go negative for this monstrosity

incontrol · 22 March 2017, 12:01 PM

I like it but I am not buying so it is easy to say. The price seems good to me for an in house chronograph with a date. There are not too many around at about $4500 USD.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Bluside · 22 March 2017, 12:10 PM

Not for me.

Boothroyd · 22 March 2017, 12:23 PM

I wonder how many of these they are projecting to sell in the US, and if they will come anywhere close to their target.

22 March 2017, 09:53 AM	#66
Hairdude1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Alex Location: Chicago Watch: AP,PP, Rolex Posts: 37,156	No thank you __________________ Instagram: @Hairdude Watches in Collection 5070R, 5522A, 214270 MK1, 228238 16750, 26401, 5711, 116718, 116710LN, 116300, 16710"Coke", 372, 15300, 15703 (All Flipped) Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 Official Member 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas Int'l GTG 2018

22 March 2017, 10:44 AM	#73
rossi46 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2008 Real Name: Dan Location: CT, by a lake Watch: shopping Posts: 1,472	It looks ridiculously thick! And, as others have said, the design is a mishmash of styles and genres that ends up failing in the end. First strikeout by Tudor in a while, I have to say. Love the nickname Baytona, though! __________________ A watch is about the entire package, not just its appearance. Any large watch company not making its own movement is not making a watch at all; they’re just playing dress-up. --The Watch Snob

22 March 2017, 12:01 PM	#88
incontrol "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Real Name: Kevin Location: Somewhere in PA Watch: All of them... Posts: 10,355	I like it but I am not buying so it is easy to say. The price seems good to me for an in house chronograph with a date. There are not too many around at about $4500 USD. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ Patek Philippe Rolex

22 March 2017, 12:23 PM	#90
Boothroyd 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2011 Real Name: Daniel Location: Minneapolis, MN Watch: Wilsdorf(s) Posts: 10,186	I wonder how many of these they are projecting to sell in the US, and if they will come anywhere close to their target. __________________ Explorer 214270 MK I/Datejust II Black 116300/Tudor Heritage Black Bay Black 79220N

22 March 2017, 09:27 AM	#61
gyro "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2015 Real Name: randy Location: alberta Watch: rolex Posts: 191	So everyone seems to be saying here and on CWC ---> Nice watch with wrong hands at a good starter price of around $5000 with In house movement BUT not enough goods to sell this watch to speedy lovers That is what I am getting ?

22 March 2017, 09:35 AM	#62
MickCollins1916 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2014 Real Name: Bill Location: Baltimore, MD Watch: 116600 SD4K Posts: 3,233	Not a fan.

22 March 2017, 10:00 AM	#67
astewartconst "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2015 Posts: 453	Nope Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

22 March 2017, 10:19 AM	#68
ivanos "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2017 Location: Planet Earth Posts: 190	For me Tudor is trying to leverage its recent success in Black Bay line and take a further step to get more market with the chrono. Similar rationale can be seen for the BB 36 introduced last year. I am fine with the BB36. But the chrono with 200m of diving depth? A design confusion for me. Tudor shall try to build a classic pure chrono line, like Daytona.

22 March 2017, 10:33 AM	#70
v6inspire "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2015 Real Name: Sean Location: Atlanta, GA Watch: 16610LV Posts: 163	not feeling the thickness of it..

22 March 2017, 10:40 AM	#71
cervantes "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2014 Real Name: Jay Location: East and West Posts: 1,894	Dive watch dial and hands - steel tachymetere bezel. Hmmm.... Much prefer the heritage chrono models. Just put the new in house movement in those.

22 March 2017, 10:43 AM	#72
sickened1 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2014 Real Name: Ed Location: SoCal Watch: ugiveiswatchuget Posts: 8,962	Easy pass... now on to the next Baselworld.

22 March 2017, 11:01 AM	#77
GMT Aviator 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 X2 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2015 Real Name: Mike Location: London Posts: 3,276	Totally uninspiring. I really wish Tudor would ditch the snowflake hand. It ruins what would otherwise be a nice line-up of watches, but this chrono simply seems to lack any personality. You'd really think they'd do some customer research on the QT before making releases like this. Shame.

22 March 2017, 11:07 AM	#78
travisb 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Travis Location: FL / NYC Watch: Yes.. Posts: 32,218	No interest.., Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

22 March 2017, 11:26 AM	#79
JohnnyNoDate "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2015 Location: USA Posts: 357	Would of loved this with a diving bezel! Diver Chronos are already contradictory, and I wouldn't have minded the large snowflake hands over the subdials in that case. This dial screams diver, but the tachy bezel confuses it...

22 March 2017, 11:27 AM	#80
Springfield "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2015 Location: Springfield, IL Posts: 120	Yikes.

22 March 2017, 11:41 AM	#83
teo "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: amk Posts: 792	Wonder is the movement modular?

22 March 2017, 11:53 AM	#86
jrwilkes81 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2014 Real Name: Josh Location: Camden SC Watch: Rolex Posts: 214	nooooo

22 March 2017, 11:55 AM	#87
ragingcao "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2014 Location: Tokyo Watch: cha talking about? Posts: 2,919	The only positive about this Tudor is my bank account won't go negative for this monstrosity

22 March 2017, 12:10 PM	#89
Bluside 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Florida Posts: 3,063	Not for me.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)