ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
2 November 2015, 03:59 AM | #121 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Somewhere in PA
Watch: All of them...
Posts: 10,355
|
A Grand Seiko will always be part of my collection! The fit, finish and attention to detail is second to none. Here is my SBGE021 LE, the green dial, lume and overall operation is amazing. The green dial changes from black to a vibrant green depending on lighting. Oh did I forget to say it is one of my favorite watches!
__________________
Patek Philippe Rolex |
2 November 2015, 05:01 AM | #122 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Toronto Canada
Watch: GMT Master ll
Posts: 1,036
|
Tag reliability issues
Quote:
|
|
2 November 2015, 05:03 AM | #123 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Toronto Canada
Watch: GMT Master ll
Posts: 1,036
|
beautiful GS
Quote:
Beautiful watch I'm looking into getting one in the near future my next watch will definitely be a GS |
|
2 November 2015, 05:28 AM | #124 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2 November 2015, 07:00 AM | #125 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Dave
Location: England.
Watch: Various
Posts: 7,305
|
__________________
KINDEST REGARDS DAVE |
2 November 2015, 09:36 AM | #126 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Boston
Posts: 282
|
Some eye candy of my current grand Seikos The HAQ is incredible. From setting it when daylight savings went into effect through yesterday, it lost 1 second. The spring drives are equally as incredible - took my super spring drive 21 days to lose 1 second. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
2 November 2015, 11:00 AM | #127 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Somewhere in PA
Watch: All of them...
Posts: 10,355
|
Quote:
Thanks very much!
__________________
Patek Philippe Rolex |
|
3 November 2015, 06:32 AM | #128 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Toronto Canada
Watch: GMT Master ll
Posts: 1,036
|
where is it made
Quote:
in fairness we really don't know where any watch is made in terms of components. I've been told that a in percentage can be made elsewhere, and still call to watch a Swiss made watch I would think the same holds true for the Japanese watches |
|
4 November 2015, 07:06 AM | #129 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: TX
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 3,225
|
Just checkout these micro close up shots of GS SBGA129 from this instagram(http://instagram.com/watchdxb/) - the special Snowflake. You would want to believe that's the closest possible dial creation for the term - light snowfall and its patterns. It looks real snow
|
4 November 2015, 07:40 AM | #130 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Tom
Location: World Traveler
Watch: GMT Master II BLNR
Posts: 1,583
|
Many watch companies have interesting dial treatments, but Grand Seiko, in particular, have some exquisite texture. How is it done? Brushed on? Sprayed on? Chemical treatment to dial coating? Do all (nicer) watches start with a brass dial and then get added to? Any good videos on how textured dials are created?
|
4 November 2015, 08:21 AM | #131 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Boston
Posts: 282
|
I believe the above is a two plate for the 8 steps needed |
4 November 2015, 03:52 PM | #132 | |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Fabio
Location: Como - Italy
Posts: 4,811
|
Quote:
|
|
4 November 2015, 09:29 PM | #133 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Another nice dial shot (SBGE015)...
__________________
|
6 November 2015, 03:01 AM | #134 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Asia & US
Posts: 1,550
|
Quote:
Go back 10 years and look at the MSRP of Seiko Marinemaster SBDB001 ($5000 USD) and Rolex Sub's MSRP (~$4525), they are very close. So 10 years ago one could say they are at the same level. But now Rolex Sub has doubled in price (~$8550) and yet SBDB001 is still the same price as it was 10 years ago ($5000), and because Sub has doubled in price, so SBDB001 is no longer in the same league? If Seiko had the brand power of Rolex and could raise the price of SBDB001 every year like Rolex, the Marinemaster SBDB001 would be as expensive as Rolex Sub is today. Heck, if Rolex keeps raising prices, in 10 more years the Sub will be a 17k USD watch and Seiko will have to come up with another brand because the GS diver ($5700) will no longer be in the same league. Hopefully by that time you won't be saying "you are confusing a GS diver with 'Great Grand Seiko', it is not, the equivalent 'Great Grand Seiko super duper diver' to a Rolex sub cost about the same, simple as that". FYI The new version of SBDB001 is SBDB011, and the MSRP is now actually $4500 USD, 500 dollar less, how about that. The same watch is now cheaper than it was 10 years ago, hence my point of Seiko just doesn't have the pricing power of Rolex. 10 years ago SBDB001 competes against Rolex Sub, now it competes with Tudor........ |
|
6 November 2015, 04:07 AM | #135 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Rob
Location: Boston, MA
Watch: 1530
Posts: 3,784
|
Quote:
Literally nobody has the brand power of Rolex; to me it's a straw man argument to question why other watch companies don't behave like them. Rolex has also experienced a unique explosion in popularity in the past decade that resulted in doubled prices. There hasn't been a price increase in two and a half years in the US, so even Rolex isn't raising prices "every year." Both companies charge what they can. Rolex is more popular so they charge more. That doesn't mean Seiko is doing anything wrong; they don't have to be more popular than Rolex to be successful. Regardless, I'd be surprised if Rolex prices double vs. Seiko again anytime soon. |
|
6 November 2015, 04:21 AM | #136 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Dave
Location: England.
Watch: Various
Posts: 7,305
|
Quote:
Quote:
Look on a Seiko Marinemaster, it does not say and has never said Grand Seiko. Why have you even bothered to quote prices from a watch that is not in this topic? Where did you get the "Great Grand Seiko" name from, perhaps you are making things up. I suggest you compare like for like, a Grand Seiko to a Rolex Sub and not the non related watch (MM) you quoted.
__________________
KINDEST REGARDS DAVE |
||
6 November 2015, 04:25 AM | #137 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Asia & US
Posts: 1,550
|
Quote:
I highly doubt Rolex can double this quickly again but was just making a point since Dave just doesn't seem to get it. He seems to use the current price point as the guide to what level the watches are at. You are right, many do think MM300 is on the level of the Sub, though it doesn't run as accurately as the Sub and doesn't have sapphire crystal. |
|
6 November 2015, 04:27 AM | #138 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Dave
Location: England.
Watch: Various
Posts: 7,305
|
Quote:
__________________
KINDEST REGARDS DAVE |
|
6 November 2015, 04:46 AM | #139 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Asia & US
Posts: 1,550
|
Quote:
Do you even know what SBDB001 is? It was actually priced higher than the Sub in 2005. It has a titanium case with Spring Drive and rated 600M. I know this is a thread on GS, but I was making a point that the Sub used to be at the price point of Marinemaster SBDB001, so I was comparing "like for like". But you kept on insisting only GS can compare to the Sub because they cost similar, well that's because the Sub has doubled in price. What if in a few more years Rolex raised the price of the Sub to over 10k? What then? |
|
6 November 2015, 05:15 AM | #140 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Asia & US
Posts: 1,550
|
Quote:
But in 2005 there's no GS diver, there's only SBDB001 with sapphire crystal, titanium case, spring drive, and 600M rated depth, and it listed at $5000 USD and competes with the Rolex Sub. So they were competing against each other, they were at the same price level at one point, but because Rolex's ability to raise prices, the Sub rose above the SBDB001 price bracket. Seiko doesn't have Rolex's brand power, it can't raise prices without changing something. If Seiko had the power, it could have just raised SBDB001's price to match the Sub, but Seiko can't, no one would buy a $6000+ Marinemaster. So that's why there's a GS diver, with its more refined case, finish, bracelet and etc., and a higher price. I was not wrong comparing SBDB001 against the Sub, for a time they were the same price level, they were like for like. By the way, MM300 is not SBDB001, MM300 is SBDX001, they are far apart, SBDB001 is double the price of MM300. I am now thinking maybe the whole time you thought I was talking about MM300 (SBDX001)....and hence your strong reaction about me comparing MM300 with the Sub. |
|
6 November 2015, 08:13 AM | #141 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Tom
Location: World Traveler
Watch: GMT Master II BLNR
Posts: 1,583
|
Quote:
With that said, I would hope GS prices below Rolex for the mere fact they do not have a $100M+ annual advertising budget to support... and they know they have only had global reach for a handful of years so have to build the brand up slowly and methodically as only an Asian brand can. It is usually difficult for watch brands of 2 different price strata to truly compete against each other... if the customer had the $$ they would typically trade up to the higher cost brand if truly debating between the 2 watches usually due to a perceived quality difference, yet there is a certain Rolex customer segment that debates between the brands and will choose Grand Seiko on merit alone (+ the other design intangibles). I chose a GS GMT hi-beat SBGJ001 over a Rolex Explorer II Polar... not because of price but because for me the quality was very comparable and the GS GMT look better fit my need than the Rolex. There are good looking $500 watches... when looked at from 2 feet away, but there is a minimum level of fit and finish I require of my "next up watches" and Grand Seiko and Rolex are at the bottom of that consideration set. This is how I know they compete against each other. BTW, in 2005 Rolex was selling the 16610 Sub, with aluminum bezel, old style bracelet/clasp, etc... So comparing the last generation Rolex pricing to the modern day Sub is also not apples to apples. |
|
6 November 2015, 08:48 AM | #142 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 3,990
|
Another factor in the eternally contested Rolex/GS debate, is that GS are entirely hand assembled, and combined with the figures for Credor, Galante, and the Prospex models made at the same Studios, they output around 15K pieces annually.
And with most of what’s made being sold in the JDM, there’s not an awful lot left for the few export markets that can official order Grand Seikos. Even then, when I spoke with Seiko UK, it was revealed that not all models are on the export list, including those with a different coloured dial – so the trade price differed too. Bit of a weird set-up, but that’s how it is, apparently. Now compare that to Rolex’s 850K+ annual production, which pales to insignificance with the number of watches the 3 main Japanese brands produce each year. As I’ve probably said before (elsewhere), there’s more than one way to skin a cat. Or put another way, many small drop make a full bucket. Grand Seiko will never really compete directly with Rolex, as the typical buyer for each brand is very different. Forget about us lot on forums like this – we’re not the target market. |
6 November 2015, 10:03 AM | #143 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Tom
Location: World Traveler
Watch: GMT Master II BLNR
Posts: 1,583
|
Quote:
On another forum there was some data assembled from multiple internet sources about Grand Seiko volume/scale. Since it's international launch in 2010 to Baselworld in 2014 sales had tripled, per a Seiko executive. I can only assume by now they have quadrupled or more. The Spring Drive and Quartz GS are assembled in one facility, the automatic movement watches in another. The latest estimates are automatic watch annual production is approaching 20K-30K units and quartz/spring drive GS is approaching 40K-60K units. |
|
6 November 2015, 11:09 AM | #144 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 573
|
I just posted a thread about this yesterday and bought the hi beat gmt today.
Brand perception or no, GS is high value for the dollar and I wouldnt be surprised if we are paying a lot more for them over the coming years. |
6 November 2015, 11:13 AM | #145 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Boston
Posts: 282
|
Grand Seiko Opinions?
I finally have this beauty coming in tomorrow. Rated basically the same as Patek - +4 / -2!
|
6 November 2015, 11:24 AM | #146 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 573
|
the dials are amazing - enjoy
|
6 November 2015, 01:07 PM | #147 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Asia & US
Posts: 1,550
|
Quote:
But Dave insisted on I should have never compared the SBDB001 against the Sub, he doesn't seemed to know they "were" the same level before. But now looking back I am pretty sure he thought I was comparing the MM300 agains the Sub. I don't think he knows what the SBDB001 is. |
|
6 November 2015, 01:54 PM | #148 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Bay Area
Watch: Rolexes and Seikos
Posts: 65
|
I would like to meet your AD! I'd even fly to Seoul to do it.
Quote:
|
|
6 November 2015, 09:27 PM | #149 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Dave
Location: England.
Watch: Various
Posts: 7,305
|
Quote:
I still disagree with you but have decided to agree to disagree.
__________________
KINDEST REGARDS DAVE |
|
6 November 2015, 10:49 PM | #150 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Congrats - a beauty indeed!
__________________
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.