ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
3 July 2017, 10:50 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Ny
Posts: 217
|
PAM 389 or 1389
Should I bite on the 389 or wait for the 1389?
Can't decide because the 389 is a bit too thick |
3 July 2017, 11:19 PM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
For the thinner case go 1389.
|
4 July 2017, 03:16 AM | #3 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34,495
|
1389 for me: I like the blue hand for the submersibles, plus the thinner case is a plus. I also think the solid case back makes more sense for an "anti magnetic" model.
|
4 July 2017, 05:01 AM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,041
|
Thinner is better, four digits in a blowout
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.