ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

usrudiver932 · 30 September 2016, 02:18 AM

Pins only I don't see screws, wad of sticky tape unscrew back will tell!!

thesharkfactor · 30 September 2016, 02:41 AM

My opinion now is I think that it's good.. sorry if I gave you a fright last night. Others will confirm.

See if you can get the caseback off with the sticky tape method and post a pic of the movement. That's the only sure way of knowing.

Cobain · 30 September 2016, 03:20 AM

I checked the movement by watchmaker after the near death experience i had last night.

The dial IS original just not 1991 original model, still kinda on the fence about the band.

But at least the rest is original, phew.

thesharkfactor · 30 September 2016, 03:24 AM

That's great news. Again, sorry for the drama. Is it yours?

thesharkfactor · 30 September 2016, 03:28 AM

This pic here was the tell-tale for me..

See the crown doesn't sit in the middle of the case, it sits slightly higher towards the top/bezel. This is the way its meant to be on a genuine Sub, but a with a fake, the crown sits dead centre.

Cobain · 30 September 2016, 03:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thesharkfactor

That's great news. Again, sorry for the drama. Is it yours?

Yes, but im trying to get rid of it.

GLADIATOR · 30 September 2016, 04:04 AM

Well thanks for the better photos, watch looks fine to me. I would have said the bracelet was fake, but "crowncollections" did say they used "split pins" - so I dont know
adam

crowncollection · 30 September 2016, 06:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GLADIATOR

Well thanks for the better photos, watch looks fine to me. I would have said the bracelet was fake, but "crowncollections" did say they used "split pins" - so I dont know

adam

This is normal on older gold sub bands I have this model

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

crowncollection · 30 September 2016, 06:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cobain

Yes, but im trying to get rid of it.

The watch is fine

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

GLADIATOR · 30 September 2016, 06:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crowncollection

This is normal on older gold sub bands I have this model

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thanks David

I was not doubting your knowledge, just I did not know that - so thanks
a

cajunron · 3 October 2016, 06:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thesharkfactor

This pic here was the tell-tale for me..

See the crown doesn't sit in the middle of the case, it sits slightly higher towards the top/bezel. This is the way its meant to be on a genuine Sub, but a with a fake, the crown sits dead centre.

This photo bothers me too.

Cobain · 4 October 2016, 02:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cajunron

This photo bothers me too.

What is wrong with that picture exactly?

I think the only thing that's wrong is the missing <25 on the dial, i could be wrong though.

fskywalker · 4 October 2016, 04:13 AM

So fake or not?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

PRSWILL · 5 October 2016, 12:18 AM

I think you all need to take a chill pill... These photos are average at best and don't tell the whole story. Just take it to a deal and stop with the nonsense.

30 September 2016, 04:04 AM	#37
GLADIATOR "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: Adam Location: Costa Blanca, Watch: YMII,GMTII,DAYTONA Posts: 5,288	Well thanks for the better photos, watch looks fine to me. I would have said the bracelet was fake, but "crowncollections" did say they used "split pins" - so I dont know adam __________________ The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. Winston Churchill "We judge ourselves by what we feel capable of doing, while others judge us by what we have already done."

4 October 2016, 04:13 AM	#43
fskywalker 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2014 Real Name: Francisco Location: San Juan, PR Watch: Is Ticking ! Posts: 24,604	So fake or not? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro __________________ Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 2230.50.00 Zenith 02.470.405 Henry Archer Eclipse 2FA security enabled

30 September 2016, 02:18 AM	#31
usrudiver932 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2016 Real Name: Larry B Location: Ontario, Canada Watch: 116610LN Posts: 207	Pins only I don't see screws, wad of sticky tape unscrew back will tell!!

30 September 2016, 02:41 AM	#32
thesharkfactor "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Scotland Watch: GMT Posts: 3,488	My opinion now is I think that it's good.. sorry if I gave you a fright last night. Others will confirm. See if you can get the caseback off with the sticky tape method and post a pic of the movement. That's the only sure way of knowing.

30 September 2016, 03:20 AM	#33
Cobain "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2016 Real Name: Michael Location: USA Posts: 440	I checked the movement by watchmaker after the near death experience i had last night. The dial IS original just not 1991 original model, still kinda on the fence about the band. But at least the rest is original, phew.

30 September 2016, 03:24 AM	#34
thesharkfactor "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Scotland Watch: GMT Posts: 3,488	That's great news. Again, sorry for the drama. Is it yours?

30 September 2016, 03:28 AM	#35
thesharkfactor "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Scotland Watch: GMT Posts: 3,488	This pic here was the tell-tale for me.. See the crown doesn't sit in the middle of the case, it sits slightly higher towards the top/bezel. This is the way its meant to be on a genuine Sub, but a with a fake, the crown sits dead centre.

5 October 2016, 12:18 AM	#44
PRSWILL "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2014 Location: Minnesota Posts: 246	I think you all need to take a chill pill... These photos are average at best and don't tell the whole story. Just take it to a deal and stop with the nonsense.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)