Does every collection need an Explorer 1?

[davek35]

Nice 2 Rolex collection. If I were to have 2 this would be it. (Explorer I 124270 and Submariner)

Correct me if i'm wrong, but don't both of these have, pretty much, the same dial/crystal size? One has added moveable bezel, one doesn't.

Originally Posted by DCheeta

I would never say that another person’s collection “needs” anything. Each person should have what they want to have.

For me, personally, I think I’d always need one of these two basics (Sub is mine, Explorer is my wife’s).

[brandrea]

Originally Posted by DCheeta

I would never say that another person’s collection “needs” anything. Each person should have what they want to have.

For me, personally, I think I’d always need one of these two basics (Sub is mine, Explorer is my wife’s).

Fantastic photo Dave

[EvelynWaugh]

Originally Posted by DCheeta

I would never say that another person’s collection “needs” anything. Each person should have what they want to have.

For me, personally, I think I’d always need one of these two basics (Sub is mine, Explorer is my wife’s).

Wow that's a nice 1-2 punch for you and the wife. looks great together

[iaymnu]

I think an exp is definitely a must have if you have more than 1 Rolex. It’s great a low key piece. I wear my Exp 36mm everyday @ work in the ER. It goes unnoticed, doesn’t get in the way, and looking at it from time to time relieves stress.

[SS Oyster]

I don’t like “must haves” because I can think of at least four Rolex must haves, two Omega must haves, two PP, 1 AP, and so on, which is daunting for the newer collector who feels they have to spend $109k before they even start buying watches that sing to them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[CarlOver]

No.

[TopDog2315]

No, not really.

A Submariner, yes!!

Cheers


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[NachoNeal]

Yes, if you're anti complications.
I've got a sub no date and an explorer 1 and I wouldn't mind adding an older airking and perhaps a white OP.

[inadeje]

Not mine, sadly too small.

[GST15]

Not for me. 39 maybe, but the 36 looks a bit small IMHO

[GGGMT]

Originally Posted by IR201

I've seen a lot of posts about how every collection needs a sub or speedmaster. And obviously it's not true, as collections need whatever people like at whatever level they can afford. But just following that idea, in your opinion, where would the Explorer 1 sit in the hierarchy of "every collection needs one" watches?

In Short yes. Or perhaps 2 ex 1. 39 and 36. Love them both.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[SLWoodster]

Maybe 39mm or 1016 explorer.

[LA_LEC]

Originally Posted by mfserge

Explorer 1 wouldn’t sit anywhere close to a respectable watch collection. That watch has nothing to offer.

[Oyster Sauce]

I don’t think every collection needs an Explorer. For those who collect/accumulate multiple watches, especially sport watches, the Explorer will often be redundant.

That being said, as a stand-alone watch the Explorer is outstanding. For a non-collector wanting a low-key but very satisfying Rolex, the Explorer is a top choice

[pepe01]

If i can pay 6K at Rolex AD and get only 1watch which i cannot sell for life.

I will buy Explorer 1 36mm.

No need Daytona, GMT, Sub, etc. even i can buy at 1K, I also don't want to buy.

[csaltphoto]

I like it's looks a lot but would miss the timing bezel of my sub which I use at least once a day.

[dawalsh]

Originally Posted by pepe01

If i can pay 6K at Rolex AD and get only 1watch which i cannot sell for life.

I will buy Explorer 1 36mm.

No need Daytona, GMT, Sub, etc. even i can buy at 1K, I also don't want to buy.

MSRP for Explorer I is $7,200. Good luck getting it at $6K.

[mikelprz]

Every collection should be different. For me, the explorer 36mm is the next plan for my collection. Do i need it? Nope, but i like it.

[Kevin of Larchmont]

No, every collection does not need an Explorer 1. But mine does.

[psif]

An Explorer must be included in your collection. In my opinion it wouldn’t look complete.

[Peter99]

Originally Posted by Pinchy

Explorer beats all other sports rolex onto my wrist because they are all overstated, overhyped, over flashy.

I do sometimes want a watch that makes a bit of a splash and statement, but for that purpose the gmt sub and daytona all compete. But then when I want something classy, sporty, actual heritage, the explorer wins.

It's a cool watch. And out of all the entire Rolex line up, if I could have only one, it would be the explorer.

[HL65]

No

[mountainjogger]

No collection needs any reference. Purchase and wear what makes you happy.

[S.Explorer]

The Explorer is low key, most legible and comfortable. Some may call it bland but I'd call it a clean design with the amazing 3, 6, 9 dial and upside down triangle. It will go with everything.

It would be the first in my collection, ahead of the GMT, Submariner, etc.

[mailman]

It's a great watch but no.

[Vesper Lynd]

I don't know what Explorer 1 is.
I love the Explorer though.

[jakjuventus]

My answer is no, it doesnt only need an Explorer, it need more than one

One worn with strap and the other one on bracelet.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[cryptowalkway]

Originally Posted by seabreeze60

Here’s my Rolex top 7 list

1. Explorer 36MM - own
2. Rolex Date 34MM - past owner
3. Cellini - past owner
4. Submariner 5 digit - past owner
5. Yacht Master - goal
6. GMT - goal
7. DJ - TT - past owner

Wow. Safe to say that’s not a list you’d find elsewhere. Fair play though!

[JR16]

I had one in my collection but traded it away. Something a bit off w the 39mm dimensions and got bored with its. Wanted to love the new 36mm but when I tried it on, it was just too small for my taste.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Joearch]

Not an explorer I fan.