The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

View Poll Results: 25829 + 26331OR + cash for the 26585CE
Go for it! 43 46.24%
Keep what you have! Maybe try for a ceramic down the line 50 53.76%
Voters: 93. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 5 December 2020, 08:08 AM   #1
yehiashawki
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Egypt
Posts: 62
Trading up for a Ceramic Skeleton

Would you trade these 2 pieces + 110k for the Ceramic Perpetual Skeleton?
I find myself with this very tempting but difficult decision..
Id be trading in my yellow gold perpetual skeleton and a new rose gold blue dial chrono + the cash for it..
Would love to hear (read) your thoughts!
yehiashawki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2020, 08:14 AM   #2
Texas4ever
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Texas
Watch: WG Daytona
Posts: 132
I personally would not.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Texas4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2020, 08:19 AM   #3
Texas4ever
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Texas
Watch: WG Daytona
Posts: 132
Seems like you are giving up quite a lot for just that one watch, why not use the 110k and get the ceramic calendar non Skeltonized. Don’t get me wrong the piece you are looking to snag is amazing but just seems like a lot. Just my opinion though


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Texas4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2020, 08:23 AM   #4
edo
"TRF" Member
 
edo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Sarajevo
Posts: 1,808
Never... from ownership point of view, not the overhyped new trends and values, I will not give just that beautiful 39 gold perpetual for the ceramic one... and adding to this gold chrono and 110k is pure madness....
edo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2020, 08:38 AM   #5
yehiashawki
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Egypt
Posts: 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas4ever View Post
Seems like you are giving up quite a lot for just that one watch, why not use the 110k and get the ceramic calendar non Skeltonized. Don’t get me wrong the piece you are looking to snag is amazing but just seems like a lot. Just my opinion though


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Actually that is an option, it would be a bit more than 110, but its something I've definitely considered.. Im just worried the regular black ceramic may be a little monotonous and dull. Never handled one in the flesh tbh I've only had the tourbillon version in my hand.
Initially the cash was going to go for a 15407ST.
yehiashawki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2020, 08:57 AM   #6
huncho
2024 Pledge Member
 
huncho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: nyc
Posts: 6,333
no way...
huncho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2020, 09:07 AM   #7
ragsk
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 1,505
No way!!!!

The ceramic is way overhyped. Feels cheap on the wrist compared to SS or PM. Stick to what you have.
ragsk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2020, 09:24 AM   #8
rolexfanforlife
"TRF" Member
 
rolexfanforlife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: USA
Watch: Sub
Posts: 963
Definitely not. Add the non skeletonized ceramic
__________________
GS: SBGP017; Omega: PO diamond; RM: 67-02 (Green); Rolex: 16710, 16520, 116509 (TMOP), 116520, 5513, 1680, 16013 (Tiffany stamped), 116610LV, 124300 x 2 (Celebration; Green), 126719BLRO (Meteorite), 226570 (polar) Oyster Quartz; Tag: Monaco; VC: Patrimony!
rolexfanforlife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2020, 09:30 AM   #9
peterpl
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: .
Posts: 6,692
Those 2 PLUS $110k? LMFAO

No way in the world.
peterpl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2020, 11:29 AM   #10
thefireman1994
"TRF" Member
 
thefireman1994's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: McKinley Stephens
Posts: 88
Add a ceramic diver as you don’t have an offshore.

Wouldn’t do that trade personally


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
thefireman1994 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2020, 01:31 PM   #11
illiguy
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
illiguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: UTC/GMT -5
Posts: 3,463
Not a chance.
illiguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2020, 03:41 PM   #12
carpro12
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: miami
Posts: 3
no way!!
carpro12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2020, 04:37 PM   #13
VogelPhoenix
"TRF" Member
 
VogelPhoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 3,599
That YG perpetual calendar is fantastic. As much or more character vs the ceramic, IMO. Would not do that trade.
VogelPhoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2020, 04:59 PM   #14
7sins
"TRF" Member
 
7sins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: B.
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Posts: 3,343
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas4ever View Post
Seems like you are giving up quite a lot for just that one watch, why not use the 110k and get the ceramic calendar non Skeltonized. Don’t get me wrong the piece you are looking to snag is amazing but just seems like a lot. Just my opinion though


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This plus +1. Or if you want a skeleton dial, go for the below, keep your two watches and spend less than 110k while keeping your perpetual.


if you have to have a skeleton perpetual, save the money and go for the VC
__________________
Richard Mille RG RM030 || Richard Mille RM72ti || AP 26240 50TH Green Royal Oak Chrono || AP Royal Oak Blue JUMBO SS 15202ST || AP ROO Diver Green 15720ST || ♕ Rolex Platinum Daytona Diamond 116506 || Cartier Santos
7sins is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2020, 06:29 PM   #15
Vivalas
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Stephen
Location: UK
Watch: AP
Posts: 2,532
Too high a price to pay in my opinion.

Seems most of the comments here are in agreement, yet the voting says different. A lot of silent ‘yes’ members. Interested to know why they are a yes.
Vivalas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2020, 06:38 PM   #16
AshAP
"TRF" Member
 
AshAP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ash
Location: UK
Watch: AP Royal Oak
Posts: 4,544
I think trading those two amazing watches + the cash is too much. I don’t agree that the ceramic feels cheap however, the ceramic has an amazing look and if it isn’t abused will always look new.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
AshAP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2020, 07:09 PM   #17
youthagainsttt
"TRF" Member
 
youthagainsttt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: HK
Watch: Piaget,Rolex,AP,HB
Posts: 1,038
I've just bought a skeleton ceramic watch as well, but IMO the calendar really isn't very legible on this model. Not my favourite skeleton watch, so I'd say don't do it
youthagainsttt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2020, 08:39 PM   #18
Swaye
"TRF" Member
 
Swaye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: USA
Watch: What I am wearing.
Posts: 1,879
Quote:
Originally Posted by peterpl View Post
Those 2 PLUS $110k? LMFAO

No way in the world.
This.
__________________
RolexH. Moser F.P. JourneAudemars PiquetPatek Philippe
_______________________________
"I'm not playing hard to get, I'm playing hard to want."
Swaye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2020, 10:15 PM   #19
1William
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 44,749
The sum of one is not greater than the two and cash you would have to give up.
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2020, 12:12 AM   #20
gtnator
2024 Pledge Member
 
gtnator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Watch: DSSD, SD43, Pepsi,
Posts: 2,064
I would do it, but I’m different in that I have EXTRA LOVE for the skeleton. So to me, it’s worth it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
gtnator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2020, 02:04 AM   #21
strettyend
"TRF" Member
 
strettyend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Miami
Posts: 1,653
Holy smokes that yellow gold perp is incredible.

No way!
__________________
AP ROC 26315or; AP RO 15450st; Vacheron Fiftysix; Day Date RG 228235 Olive; Daytona YG 116528; Daytona YG Oysterflex 116518; Cartier Santos de Cartier Rose Gold; Panerai PAM 0048; IWC Portofino Chrono; Girard-Perregaux Richeville
strettyend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2020, 02:05 AM   #22
DoctorA
"TRF" Member
 
DoctorA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 6,523
Go with what makes you happy. I personally wouldn’t!
__________________
Wear the watch you like, not the one they tell you to wear!
DoctorA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2020, 02:24 AM   #23
911AP
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 445
I second going with the ceramic perpetual and not the skeleton. Keep what you have. Or sell the rose gold chrono to help pay the difference. Your perpetual calendar is too unique.
911AP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2020, 03:55 AM   #24
Valedictorian
"TRF" Member
 
Valedictorian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Stateside now
Posts: 190
I would get rid of those gold watches and go for the ceramic perpetual, perhaps not necessarily for the skeleton version.
Valedictorian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2020, 01:48 PM   #25
rtanjaya
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Singapore
Watch: AP
Posts: 232
No, would keep what you have and use the cash for something else. As many mentioned, the ceramic perpetual is a great option
rtanjaya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2020, 08:45 AM   #26
macrowatch
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Posts: 4,365
I voted keep, but if the cash came down a bit, I’d totally got for it.
macrowatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 December 2020, 02:02 AM   #27
yehiashawki
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Egypt
Posts: 62
Honestly i find the 26579’s dial too monotonous. This is obviously a winner but I’m betting wont be too far off the ceramic perpetual skeleton!
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg CAE0FC22-8C51-49BE-B8C4-5A3A12F5FDD8.jpeg (95.5 KB, 523 views)
yehiashawki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 December 2020, 05:15 PM   #28
DeeTee
"TRF" Member
 
DeeTee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Netflix
Posts: 3,977
It would be tough to let go of the YG but the numbers are right.
If you can swing it keep the YG, but I would do the trade even if you couldn’t . The 26585CE is worth subtracting for.
DeeTee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 December 2020, 10:03 PM   #29
Uros
"TRF" Member
 
Uros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Europe
Posts: 391
I wouldnt, too much money


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Uros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 December 2020, 10:32 PM   #30
brandrea
2024 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 73,697
Full disclosure these time pieces are way out of my price league

That said, I’ve never really got ceramic material in watches. It just doesn’t appeal to me in the least YMMV
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.