111 vs. 392 Quick!

[bcacncnc]

Correct me if I'm wrong but the 392 is the 42 mm version of the 312 right?

I have 6.25 inch wrists, and I would guess the 111 is a much more comfortable fit on you. I would wait and try on the 392 - and then make up your mind. The 111 is a great watch, so its no lesser of a watch if it suits all your needs. Good luck.

[Psmith]

Originally Posted by bcacncnc

Correct me if I'm wrong but the 392 is the 42 mm version of the 312 right? I have 6.25 inch wrists, and I would guess the 111 is a much more comfortable fit on you. I would wait and try on the 392 - and then make up your mind. The 111 is a great watch, so its no lesser of a watch if it suits all your needs. Good luck.

That's pretty much it. Other than the size, the main visual difference is that the 392 loses the '9' and in its place goes the seconds subdial (like a 233)