ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
21 September 2020, 06:22 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: GB
Posts: 73
|
Any red flags on this Rolex Submariner Date 16610?
Hi all,
I’m looking at picking up a preowned Rolex Submariner Date 16610 as a full set with ‘V’ serial number and warranty card dated 2010. It hasn’t had a Rolex service but an independent one. Dealer wants £8k and has sent the below pics. Appreciate any advice. |
21 September 2020, 08:02 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: GB
Posts: 73
|
Here’s some close up of the chamfers
|
21 September 2020, 08:21 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 74
|
Rolex crown on the crown is upside down.
|
21 September 2020, 08:32 AM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Sam
Location: VRB/SUS
Watch: 16233, First Rolex
Posts: 1,646
|
If there are 'red flags', I don't see them. The price seems steep to me but maybe that's the current market value in your area.
Good luck with your decision. |
21 September 2020, 08:33 AM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: West Coast
Posts: 2,349
|
|
21 September 2020, 08:35 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Real Name: JohnLT
Location: Boston
Watch: time fly
Posts: 618
|
The crystal seems suspect but I can clearly see the LEC. Not sure thats good or bad. But otherwise it looks very clean.
|
21 September 2020, 08:36 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Real Name: JohnLT
Location: Boston
Watch: time fly
Posts: 618
|
|
21 September 2020, 08:48 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,644
|
I nearly got scammed last year on a sub. It had a ton of gen parts mixed in. Ask for pics of the inside of the bracelet + stamps.
|
21 September 2020, 04:06 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: GB
Posts: 73
|
|
21 September 2020, 05:59 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: GB
Posts: 73
|
Isnt this just the normal crystal?
|
21 September 2020, 06:37 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,486
|
My opinion is that this is one of the latest (and near perfect) 16610 fakes. You should not be able to see the LEC in that first picture, I think the CG at 2 is thicker than the CG at 4 and they are both too short. I think the SEL at 1 doesn’t fit right and the date font may be too bold.
Difficult to judge as these are super reps. Buy the seller my friend. |
21 September 2020, 07:04 PM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: GB
Posts: 73
|
Quote:
Also, the CG and font thickness for the date window seems consistent with other watches listed elsewhere. The fact this comes from a brick and mortar jewellers should provide confidence tat any issues with authenticity can be challenged if it transpires that this is, indeed, a fake which I highly doubt. |
|
21 September 2020, 07:24 PM | #13 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 36,792
|
I note that you appreciate the comment but:
If you are so sure it is genuine why ask for opinions. The pix are not good enough for me. Take it to a RSC for a service quote as this will give you confirmation of authenticity and condition?
__________________
E |
21 September 2020, 07:39 PM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,486
|
Quote:
..but let's not just leave it there, I want to help you... so - go back to this watch/dealer and have a look at the clasp see if it has code E06, and have a look at the underside of the little flip locker, if is it shiny - it's the very super replica I speak of - these will have a clone 3135 movement - many so called watchmakers have been fooled by these (or so it is claimed if you read this whole watchout section). Looking forward to hearing back from you. |
|
21 September 2020, 07:46 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: GB
Posts: 73
|
Thanks for the tips all and I do appreciate the advice.
Sorry if I came across as a dick! I'll keep the thread updated... |
21 September 2020, 07:53 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Earth
Posts: 757
|
The watch is fine, it’s been on a lapping machine though, most noticeable on the top of the lugs.
Can’t tell if the crystal is original from the pictures supplied. |
21 September 2020, 08:03 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: GB
Posts: 73
|
Is it one to avoid or probably as good as I am going to get for a 10 year old Submariner at this price point?
|
21 September 2020, 08:18 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Earth
Posts: 757
|
The price is at the right point, but it depends on your personal preferences in regards to condition. There are hundreds of late 16610’s available at that money, some better, and of course, some worse.
|
21 September 2020, 08:33 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: GB
Posts: 73
|
Im struggling to find a better one at this price point!
The price on these just seems to be getting stronger as time goes on... |
21 September 2020, 10:15 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: GB
Posts: 73
|
I've received the following videos to show the condition a little clearer:
https://i.imgur.com/ea1Vlbi.mp4 https://imgur.com/aoiPhO6 Again I appreciate any comments anyone has. Thanks |
22 September 2020, 12:57 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,486
|
From the videos; looks much better than the pics. Its had a polish but is very acceptable. No stretch in the bracelet, Whole watch looks clean. Go get it!
|
22 September 2020, 01:14 AM | #22 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Wine Country, Ca
Posts: 5,838
|
The only thing I dont like are the mis-matched crown guards. One side has definitely been polished more
__________________
TRF Member 11738 |
22 September 2020, 02:23 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,486
|
I noticed that too..
|
22 September 2020, 02:36 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: GB
Posts: 73
|
I think that was just the angle as they look the same in other pictures.
I have gone ahead and paid for it - looking forward to getting it on the wrist! Thanks all for your help. |
22 September 2020, 04:17 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Middle East
Posts: 1,809
|
I have the same serial reference from 2010 (bought around 4 weeks ago). This looks the same as mine, albeit it’s had a bit of a polish. One very slight difference is that mine has a gap between the 300m - but I believe that is a random dial difference. I’ve seen both styles on V serials.
Looks tidy to me though and I’m sure you’ll enjoy it. They’re the last of the best in my eyes. |
22 September 2020, 07:31 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,157
|
Appears ok
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
watches many |
22 September 2020, 09:35 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: SW-Florida
Posts: 240
|
Looks ok. Price may be different from what I would expect due to your location.
__________________
Life is too short for just one Rolex! Lineup: 1601 (SD) - 16030 (SD) - 126334 (BLSO) -116600 - 116610LV Mk.III - 126610LV - 126710BLRO Mk.III (Jubilee/Oyster) - 116500LN-0072 (BD/SD) |
24 September 2020, 09:15 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Norway
Watch: 116610 LN
Posts: 200
|
This looks good to me. No red flags.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.