ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
4 August 2017, 12:08 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Real Name: Peter
Location: Caribbean
Watch: BB58
Posts: 2,398
|
Some Vintage Rolex Concerns & Doubts
Hey Guys,
Been on this forum for a while now and realized I'm attracted to 5 and 4 Digit references more than the modern ones. I'm waiting for a Daytona 500 which most likely I will sell for a profit next year. Truth is, the Submariner is my grail. So, that said, I want a vintage sub date, perhaps a 1680 and would like your help to clear some doubts, that are not necessarily about the watch per se. Ill try to be as brief as possible and sorry if this has been asked before. 1) Service vs 5 digit. How often would I have to service it compared to the 5-6 years I service my YM. 2) Im no collector, I use, beat and enjoy my watches, from the office to the beach and just about anything in my way. Will a decent, clean 1680 hold up for this as my 5 digit YM has for the past 13 years? 3) How practical (service costs, replacement parts and robustness) will vintage Rolex be in 20 years? Yes, I know this is speculating but would love to hear some thoughts on this. 4) Anything special I should look out for when purchasing? Any recommendations on other references? No GMTs please. Thank you all! Btw, I blame the "everyday is a vintage day" thread for this, at least, thats what Im telling my wife.
__________________
Present: BB58 | BB36 | GMW-B5000D-1JF | 6900-PT80 Past: 16610LN | 16622 | 116610LN | 214270 |
4 August 2017, 12:27 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Per
Location: Sweden
Watch: Gilt Rolex
Posts: 2,946
|
A 1680 is by no means different owning than a modern YM. As long as you make sure it is waterproof you can do whatever with it. Parts will be available as long as you live so there really isn't any problems if you want to go that path.
|
4 August 2017, 02:07 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Real Name: Peter
Location: Caribbean
Watch: BB58
Posts: 2,398
|
Thank you! I don't know why, but Ive always had the impression that 4 digits are a bit more fragile and not a beatable as a 5 digit ref.
__________________
Present: BB58 | BB36 | GMW-B5000D-1JF | 6900-PT80 Past: 16610LN | 16622 | 116610LN | 214270 |
4 August 2017, 02:22 AM | #4 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Great State of TX
Posts: 5,684
|
Some Vintage Rolex Concerns & Doubts
1) same
2) that 1680 has been around for 40 or so years, it'll last a few more years! 3) hard to say, but hopefully it'll be strong. If not, hopefully you'll still love it regardless! 4) yes lots of things to look out for, too many to list. Post up before buying, we can help. Other refs--sea dweller or sub. And why are you a GMTaphobe? I'll be they grow on you as you see more and more photos of them. Edit to add: I wear my 2.9 mil sub daily and for all activities. It's tough as nails. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Forty six & 2 are just ahead of me. Follow me on Instagram @ccrolex |
4 August 2017, 02:27 AM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Real Name: Peter
Location: Caribbean
Watch: BB58
Posts: 2,398
|
Quote:
Thanks!! I really like the GMT but I really don't need the complication and I use the timing bezel everyday, obviously to time unimportant things, but everyday I'll start searching and will post any options that catch my eyes, I've been told Tokyo is a great place to find some great examples and I'm planning a trip soon there.
__________________
Present: BB58 | BB36 | GMW-B5000D-1JF | 6900-PT80 Past: 16610LN | 16622 | 116610LN | 214270 |
|
4 August 2017, 03:46 AM | #6 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,197
|
Quote:
The complication for the GMT 1675 is the same as found in the Sub 1680 with a couple more parts related to the the 24-hour hand.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
|
5 August 2017, 02:06 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Real Name: Peter
Location: Caribbean
Watch: BB58
Posts: 2,398
|
Quote:
__________________
Present: BB58 | BB36 | GMW-B5000D-1JF | 6900-PT80 Past: 16610LN | 16622 | 116610LN | 214270 |
|
6 August 2017, 12:24 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Tony
Location: UK
Watch: AP, Rolex, JLC...
Posts: 631
|
I wear my 1680 Red Sub daily with the exception of swimming, for that I wear a modern Rolex. If that bothers you, go for a nice 16800 with maxi dial. Vintage looks with the piece of mind of a modern Rolex.
__________________
Kind Regards, Tony. |
6 August 2017, 04:29 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: USA
Watch: where do i start??
Posts: 3,254
|
The main concern would be the tritium since you used the term "beat" with the way you wear your watches...
understand, just by clapping your hands too hard at a concert or a hard enough knock on a door or countertop could crack the tritium or worse, cause tritium to flake off on the dial. Service parts won't be available the rest of your life that I can say with confidence. They don't make certain parts anymore for my 6538 as well as ref 5510 to name a couple subs from the 50's.. Rolex will not make all parts forever, then you are forced to source original vintage parts which take a lot of time and money in an already dry market. If you ever did need parts and service with rolex, you are looking at service parts that will ultimately effect the value and originality of the piece. If you want a 1680 to wear as a beater with no concern, I would highly recommend seeking an already serviced luminova dialed 1680. You will get the best of both worlds, vintage look with durability of modern replacement parts. Then you can go crazy and wear it as you please without fear of devaluing the piece. but most of the collectors I know, including myself, don't wear vintage pieces as beaters, because condition is paramount. That is my advise. |
6 August 2017, 04:37 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Per
Location: Sweden
Watch: Gilt Rolex
Posts: 2,946
|
I never understood the term beater. Every day watch is one thing and I don't mind wearing my vintage pieces daily. For times when I would need a 'beater' I just don't wear a watch at all. I don't need to know the time or feel pretty while swimming, doing sports or wrecking shit.
|
6 August 2017, 06:18 AM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,002
|
Quote:
^ ^ +1 all over the above. I do have a Seiko or GShock for sports and wrecking sh*t. But I will never understand why folks wear $10,15,20k vintage pieces with abandon. I wear mine everyday to the office, hospital, around town. But always take it off if the chance is great to jack it up. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
6 August 2017, 06:53 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Real Name: Peter
Location: Caribbean
Watch: BB58
Posts: 2,398
|
Thanks everyone for the inputs.
I think a vintage sub might not be choice for me, although I'll keep looking into it. Perhaps a 16600 or a 16610lv might do the job better. Thanks! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Present: BB58 | BB36 | GMW-B5000D-1JF | 6900-PT80 Past: 16610LN | 16622 | 116610LN | 214270 |
8 August 2017, 01:34 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,973
|
The movement 15xx series in the 4 digit watches is I would say and I think most watchmakers would agree...MORE robust than the 30xx or 31xx.
I don't like to see them abused but they pretty much run ... until they don't. The cases...crystals...4 digit...models...not a whole lot of difference in strength and reliability there. Those watches don't give much trouble....they just don't unless they are hammered and even then...they can be remarkably resilient and work very very well. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.