ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
4 August 2020, 12:36 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Illinois
Posts: 17
|
Pitting
I am looking at purchasing a 1978 16014 DateJust.
When the case back is removed, there is a bit of pitting around the edge. Is this a cause for concern? Is this normal for the year / metal type? The seller wants 2,600.00 for the head; no jubilee. I am asking for guidance and / or suggestions. Thank you so much! |
4 August 2020, 12:41 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Illinois
Posts: 17
|
|
4 August 2020, 01:19 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Gabriel
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,816
|
The pitting looks a little on the aggressive side to me. It may mean the case back won't seal properly, so the watch may never pass a pressure test. A new mid case may be required. Proceed with caution.
__________________
1680 1675 16800 16570 16710 17000 16613 17013 Gone but not forgotten 16610LV 1016 16234 |
4 August 2020, 01:53 AM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,196
|
In response to your concerns, the pitting displayed in your photo is not normal. It is excessive. Personally, I'd look for a better example.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
4 August 2020, 02:20 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: DC Area, USA
Watch: IIc,1680 Red,16660
Posts: 4,483
|
With that said I’ve seen examples Bob Ridley repaired that looked worse than that...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
4 August 2020, 02:54 AM | #6 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,044
|
It is very unlikely that the sealing surface, which is what is corroded, would be able to hold securely.
It can be repaired, or made somewhat flat on a lathe, but the costs may not be worth it for this model. Up to you if you want a bit of a restoration project.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
4 August 2020, 03:10 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Here
Posts: 4,504
|
Too common of a watch not to get a really good example, i wouldn’t touch that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
4 August 2020, 03:19 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Illinois
Posts: 17
|
Thank you everyone for your guidance.
I will pass on this watch. |
4 August 2020, 05:12 AM | #9 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 5,902
|
Minor pitting is common, and not necessarily a big deal, but that photo shows pretty extreme damage. Unless there is something else about the watch that is incredibly desirable, I'd pass on that one.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG |
4 August 2020, 11:39 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Japan
Posts: 4,344
|
Wouldn't pass a pressure test. But who swims with a vintage Datejust?
|
4 August 2020, 11:50 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: CNY
Watch: TOG
Posts: 580
|
Find one with the bracelet. If you don't you will immediately start hunting for one.
|
5 August 2020, 01:06 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mitch
Location: UAE
Watch: Big Ben
Posts: 2,451
|
Pass...thats too much.
PS: I hear a lot of stories like “there is no need to service my watch. It works perfectly fine and it has never been opened in 30 yrs”. Only, that after those 30 yrs of not maintaining it regularly this is likely to happen to the case.
__________________
IG: @watch_idiot_savant |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.