ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Which to buy ? | |||
16610 LV | 52 | 47.27% | |
116610 LV | 49 | 44.55% | |
neither | 9 | 8.18% | |
Voters: 110. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
26 October 2010, 02:19 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
Wow...
I'm proud to admit that I'm a 116610LV convert. It has been on my wrist for less than 12 hours, and I'm loving it. Agree on the minty green ceramic bezel under certain light conditions but the green dial is to die for IMO. Give it some more time :-) |
26 October 2010, 02:32 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 1,434
|
I'm not a great fan of green, but voted Ceramic !
Ciao Engi |
26 October 2010, 03:28 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Matthew
Location: Rolex&911Nation
Watch: GV
Posts: 547
|
i am really suprised at how close this voting is - i voted for the LV-C but over the long term i think the LV is an increase-in-value play. however, the upgrades of the LV-C just cant be ignored and make it a better all around watch.
__________________
16710 116400GV 116710LN 116500LN 116610LV |
26 October 2010, 03:34 AM | #34 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Matthew
Location: Rolex&911Nation
Watch: GV
Posts: 547
|
Quote:
if wear around youll be disappointed going back and forth from GMTC to org. LV (esp. the bracelet quality difference) i would only get the org. LV for safe keeping and to leave BNIB.
__________________
16710 116400GV 116710LN 116500LN 116610LV |
|
26 October 2010, 03:38 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Matthew
Location: Rolex&911Nation
Watch: GV
Posts: 547
|
completely agree
__________________
16710 116400GV 116710LN 116500LN 116610LV |
29 October 2010, 02:41 PM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: indonesia
Posts: 3
|
ceramic
ceramic
|
29 October 2010, 08:02 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 825
|
well, one of the 2 is very nice, the other one overdone and ugly
|
29 October 2010, 08:36 PM | #38 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
Quote:
my initial thought of the 116610LV was - meh... too much green for my liking and didnt realise at the time that the smarty Rolex designers was able to create a green gold dial which is able to "hide" the green colour in almost all low light conditions, which will give you an almost black looking dial.... and believe me, a few times i thought i had the 16610LV on due to the green bezel insert and the black looking dial on the 116610LV at a quick glance. overdone was my initial thought - not now.... but ugly - NO. imo - the 116610LV is a great addition to the 16610LV |
|
29 October 2010, 08:41 PM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Tim
Location: Florida
Watch: No-date Sub
Posts: 289
|
C
|
29 October 2010, 10:53 PM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Nick
Location: DFW
Watch: 16610
Posts: 558
|
I would say get the 16610lv. The other one is just too green. I wish you could get a black sub C with a green insert.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.