ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
11 November 2017, 08:00 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Dabas, Hungary
Posts: 356
|
I might be going nuts thinking about this
Yes, I’m thinking to flip my Rolexes for an Aquanaut 5167
Really love the look especially on brown or military green rubber strap. I have a few second thoughts though about commencing the search. Currently have a 1016 from ‘87 and a polar Explorer II from 2000. I’m really looking forward to input from all Aquanaut owners or past owners. I’m concerned about the following. 1.) Obviously the service process is complicated and probably a lot more expensive than with Rolex. What is the average cost and how often maintenance is required? 2.) Looking at my Rolexes I can comfortably say they’re both true daily beaters, especially the Ex II. Can you place an Aquanaut into the same arena of usage, ruggedness and durability? 3.) what do you think of versatility of the watch. I can assure you that the 1016 goes with literally any attire for any occasion. Do you feel that the 5167 can be dressed up or down just easily? 4.) 1016 is a very sought after vintage piece that if I flip with my Ex II together for a modern PP I might have an enormous buyers remorse afterwards. What do you think about such trade value wise? 5.) Status wise, I’m not a CEO or top manager, currently working in a project as a coordinator would not be a bit exaggeration wearing a PP in my professional position? 6.) being stealth, a bit under the radar look for me is important. How often ppl recognized that you wore a Patek? Appreciate your time to give as sound advices as you can drawn from your experiences with the 5167. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
11 November 2017, 08:06 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Dabas, Hungary
Posts: 356
|
I might be going nuts thinking about this
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
11 November 2017, 08:11 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
|
personally if you are going to flip Rolex(s) for it, I would wait a bit and get a 5164 as it is more versatile and the dial is more interesting. Nothing against the 5167 as i like it a lot, but if you will end up with less watches as a result you might as well get one that serves more functions as you are giving up a GMT watch as well.
I wear my aquanaut as a daily with no issues but a "daily" for me isn't exploring caves or mountaineering so "ruggedness" isn't really a requirement. No one ever knows what my aquanaut is, and i like it that way. Rolex gets far more attention IMO. |
11 November 2017, 08:17 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Stuttgart
Posts: 548
|
Re:
I would keep the 1016, and also post photos of it on this thread. :-)
For the Explorer II, sure sell it. But keep the 1016. The 5167 is nicer than the Explorer II, for sure. It is NOT worth losing a 1016. |
11 November 2017, 08:33 PM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Dabas, Hungary
Posts: 356
|
Quote:
Haha got what you’re saying... But then for the Ex II not gonna get enough to flip for something nicer. Anyways here are some photos for you to drool on Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
11 November 2017, 08:37 PM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Dabas, Hungary
Posts: 356
|
Quote:
Thanks Tyler, I totally agree with you that 5164 way nicer look and gives all complications I’d lose by trading both Rolexes. However that’s completely over budget for me, they start at 26k euro, at best I’m happy if I could get 15k for the two watches. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
11 November 2017, 08:43 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Doha
Posts: 2,065
|
I might be going nuts thinking about this
I cannot advise much on the service experience of Pp because my watches are relatively new and not serviced yet but I can confidently say that the aquanaut is not as rugged as any rolex and can't take the same level of beating. My aquanaut is used less than 20% of my time and started to show some hair line scratches on the clasp despite my excessive care when wearing it. So my general advice is have the Pp as a second watch and save the first slot for a beater and for sure rolexes are the most reliable watches for that purpose
|
11 November 2017, 09:02 PM | #8 | |||||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Somewhere in time
Watch: Lange & Patek
Posts: 612
|
I have a 5164 and not a 5167, but I think most of the answers will be the same, so here is my take on you questions:
Quote:
Obviously somewhat more expensive than Rolex. I think the recommendation is service every 3-5 years. Personally I would probably stretch it a few years longer than that as long as the watch is keeping good time (modern lubricants don't dry out that easily). Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
See above. Not often, unless the people you hang with are watch nuts |
|||||
11 November 2017, 09:12 PM | #9 | ||||||
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: Glocal
Posts: 19,437
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
JMHO Nowadays... Am right now using the Rolex SS SkyD blue face as a daily beater (replaced the ceramic Submariner) with off-road bicycling, pool swimming, the beach, fixing car, traveling, sleep, shower, etc and it's been great. Case wear has been fine, and timekeeping so far is -4 seconds a month (most impressive!). My wife prefers the look of the SkyD over the Sub with Everest strap (which will now be used for scuba diving and the like).
__________________
__________________ “Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming 'Wow! What a Ride!'” -- Hunter S. Thompson Sent from my Etch A Sketch using String Theory. |
||||||
11 November 2017, 11:15 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Dabas, Hungary
Posts: 356
|
Thank you guys, I think it’s clear now even though I like the look, Rolex is the better choice for me now. And yes I would be almost unable to let go my 1016
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
12 November 2017, 05:08 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Real Name: Peter
Location: Caribbean
Watch: BB58
Posts: 2,398
|
Here’s a crazy thought, I think a better option is the 116655 Yachtmaster. Incredible strap which makes it a bit under the radar, PM and Rolex toughness. IMHO it’s a better one and only than the Aquanaut (which I really like).
Or maybe flip your Explorer 2 for something like a GMT or Sub and keep that amazing 1016! Good luck on your choice Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Present: BB58 | BB36 | GMW-B5000D-1JF | 6900-PT80 Past: 16610LN | 16622 | 116610LN | 214270 |
12 November 2017, 05:15 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Real Name: Peter
Location: Caribbean
Watch: BB58
Posts: 2,398
|
By the way, remember that any modern sports model looks and works great on a rubber strap like Everest or Rubber B, making them great dailys and stealth watches.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Present: BB58 | BB36 | GMW-B5000D-1JF | 6900-PT80 Past: 16610LN | 16622 | 116610LN | 214270 |
12 November 2017, 05:29 AM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Dabas, Hungary
Posts: 356
|
Quote:
Yes, I’ll will stick with my Ex II for a while. Currently wear it on a military green rubber strap and it looks great imo. And yes the 1016 stays Thanks everyone! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
12 November 2017, 05:34 AM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Dabas, Hungary
Posts: 356
|
Quote:
That YM been eyeing for a while now, it’s indeed a beauty! Although being yellow gold or pink gold doesn’t make it stealth enough. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
12 November 2017, 07:58 AM | #15 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,225
|
I'd keep the 1016 and add a 5167, service costs are not that bad but time could be 6months so you need another.
|
12 November 2017, 08:03 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Houston, Texas
Watch: PP, Rolex,SUF
Posts: 65
|
You need to remember that PP Aquanaut and Rolex (every one of them) represent totally different approach in the world of watches. Rolex is a tool watch. Because I live in Texas, its like a truck to me. There are plenty of those in here. They are reliable, big is size, easy to trade etc. PP Aquanaut is like an Italian racing car. Good looking car for weekend drives, but don't take it to the country side where roads are tough and something unexpected can always happen
|
12 November 2017, 08:05 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Louis
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: PP 5131R
Posts: 4,784
|
I have to agree I’d say wait until you can add the 5167. It’s a great watch but you don’t want it to be your only piece.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.