ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
27 January 2017, 07:19 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: SLC, UT, USA
Posts: 2
|
Information Please
I recently received a Rolex Model 6234, Serial #22308 as an inheritance when my aunt died. It is in excellent condition and I am wondering what I have received? Any help would be appreciated.
|
27 January 2017, 02:28 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Miami Beach
Posts: 634
|
Dial appears to be redone and hands are not correct for this reference.
Condolences. |
27 January 2017, 09:09 PM | #3 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,731
|
Just checking references suggests a Rolex Model 6234, Serial #22308 isn't possible - because 6234's were produced from 1955 to 1961 and the 5-digit serial number you provided is from the 1920's. Even if it was a typo, and the s/n was a 6-digit number, that would be the 1940's.
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
27 January 2017, 10:48 PM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Per
Location: Sweden
Watch: Gilt Rolex
Posts: 2,946
|
Quote:
I wonder if the dial and hands are both service parts or if the dial is redone? Can't recall seeing replacement dials from Rolex on this reference so no clue. :) |
|
27 January 2017, 11:28 PM | #5 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,731
|
... The OP offers a 5-digit s/n ...
But agree if it is a typo - The reset in 1950's were only for 6-digit s/n's
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
28 January 2017, 12:09 AM | #6 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 X2 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Wine Country, Ca
Posts: 5,849
|
And those hands are late 60s, maybe even 70s. It could be that the OP didnt see all of the serial number, sometimes the latter digits are hard to see due to bracelet wear on the case.
Definitely a redial, the markers on the dial should be applied and not printed.
__________________
TRF Member 11738 |
1 February 2017, 02:37 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: SLC, UT, USA
Posts: 2
|
My mistake
My mistake. I looked closer and with a better magnifying glass and the SN is 223087
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.