ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
2 August 2017, 09:21 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Watch: GMT
Posts: 8,254
|
BLNR - Crazy idea?
Ok, this might sound crazy, but I own an A1 mint BLNR - Dec 2014.
I also have a great relationship with some UK ADs and could get a brand new BLNR for list price. Here's where I need some opinions. I'm considering selling my 2 and a bit year old one and buying a brand new one. The cost to change would essentially be nothing or very little and I'd be getting the 5 year warranty and longer service interval etc. Is this crazy? Opinions welcome |
2 August 2017, 09:26 PM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,356
|
I don't see a point...but it's your money I guess heh. You'll eventually wear the new one in anyway.
|
2 August 2017, 09:30 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,895
|
Same watch same service interval.
How much is the warranty worth to you?
__________________
Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Glashutte Senator Exellence, Rolex 116710 GMT Master II BLNR, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent |
2 August 2017, 09:33 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Watch: GMT
Posts: 8,254
|
Service interval changed after 2015 I believe and so did the COSC.
Just wondered if the benefits of a new one were worth it. Mine has the older red Tag. |
2 August 2017, 09:35 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Real Name: Dave
Location: UK
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 274
|
I honestly can't see the point
|
2 August 2017, 09:38 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Real Name: Dave
Location: UK
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 274
|
Saying that you could sell your old one at a profit, buy the new watch and have enough left for a slap up tea at Mrs Miggins pie shoppe
|
2 August 2017, 09:39 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: dave
Location: miami
Watch: me ride bikes
Posts: 1,938
|
If it ain’t broke...
Sent from my iPhone 7+ using Tapatalk |
2 August 2017, 09:43 PM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,895
|
Quote:
Suggestions for service interval are just that. Regulation is a function of how well it is done on the movement, yours could be regulated to a tighter tolerance. There are no new benefits except a longer warranty, so I ask again, how much is the longer warranty worth to you? That is the only relevant factor here.
__________________
Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Glashutte Senator Exellence, Rolex 116710 GMT Master II BLNR, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent |
|
2 August 2017, 09:49 PM | #9 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,237
|
|
2 August 2017, 09:52 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 70
|
I would say it is worth the hassle, no cash loss and only gain through a longer warranty. Chances are you won't need the extra warranty, but if you did - you'll regret not "extending" it by doing the flip and new purchase.
|
2 August 2017, 09:55 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Thailand
Watch: Rolex & Panerai
Posts: 424
|
If it makes you happy, then why not? If you ever flip it in the future, a 2017 model will be worth more than a 2014 anyhow.
|
2 August 2017, 09:59 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Philippines
Posts: 120
|
Crazy idea indeed. As Zyfon said, if it makes you happy. Who are we to say otherwise?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
2 August 2017, 10:03 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 249
|
If the premium on the second-hand sale price is good, and you can get a new one at list (and before any potential UK price increase…), making the ‘cost to change’ a non-issue, then I suppose you would gain a bit, but I imagine most people wouldn’t be bothered with the hassle.
The service interval is the same for both a 2014 & 2017 BLNR – the recent ‘10 years’ letter was just a comment by Rolex that owners are – on average – tending to wait 10 years between services, rather than Rolex recommending owners actually can wait 10 years to do so. I suppose a new BLNR would delay it a bit and ‘reset the counter’ until next service though, whereas you’re already 2.5 years down the line on your current 2014 BLNR. The Warranty is an interesting one. I believe the new 5-year warranty applied to models bought from 1st July 2015, but for those who bought a new Rolex from an AD between 1st July 2013 - 1st July 2015, they got an extra bonus year on top of their 2-year warranty. So, in effect, your current BLNR warranty expires in 5 or so months’ time, whereas a new one would see you good until 2022, which is a bonus. However, would you rather the devil you know than the one you don’t? It’s unlikely, but if your current BLNR is performing without issue, could you handle a new one that might need something fixed under warranty, or have a dial imperfection, or *gasp* a misaligned bezel pip or rehaut crown? I know you could fix most serious issues under warranty, but it would be a pain. As regards the -4/+6 COSC standard on your current BLNR, versus the tighter ‘superlative chronometer’ -2/+2 accuracy offered since 1st July 2015, again, that’s a matter for debate. I’m sure Padi56 will be on hand to expertly explain better than I why COSC (or any accuracy standard) is not quite the ‘sure thing’ they might suggest, but being sceptical I would suggest most Rolexes prior to 2015 would either be in that zone already, or else be quite capable of regulation to -2/+2, and I’m not convinced Rolex do a huge amount of extra testing now, compared with prior to 2015, to ensure the new -2/+2 standard. If your BLNR is already very accurate/consistent now, I myself would probably tend towards just being happy with that. |
2 August 2017, 10:04 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Michael
Location: RTP, NC, USA
Watch: ♕& Ω
Posts: 5,099
|
A lot of people think that they can sell a watch for what other people are asking, but the reality is that no one expects to pay asking price and they usually expect the seller to pay for insured shipping, and all of that adds up. Plus the costs associated with placing the ad.
But hey, if you're that confident, give it a try. You'll gain a few years on a warranty that you'll likely never need.
__________________
Enjoy life - it has an expiration date. Disclaimer: Please note that the avatar is not an accurate representation of how I look. The camera adds 10 pounds... |
2 August 2017, 10:22 PM | #15 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 32,224
|
I wouldn't bother. Keep what you've got.
|
2 August 2017, 11:31 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Seems like a pointless exercise to me. At best, you'll be out of pocket somewhat.
__________________
|
2 August 2017, 11:43 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Colorado
Posts: 968
|
Just because the car is in great condition doesn't mean it has warranty. If you can sell the car for the same price as the new one and pick up a new car with a 5 year warranty then why wouldn't you!
|
2 August 2017, 11:45 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Earth
Watch: 126619LB and more
Posts: 5,207
|
If it were me, I'd keep the one I have.
|
2 August 2017, 11:50 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Generally, you are much more likely to use a car warranty than a watch warranty.
__________________
|
2 August 2017, 11:59 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: London
Posts: 1,223
|
Go with what makes you happy. You may make a profit on your existing one given that UK supply is very low and have the added benefit of a brand new watch with new warranty and stave off any impending servicing fees.
If you are in it for the long term then I would think that the 2014 may be more collectable than the later ones since they only released it from mid 2013. Or, you could just flip the new one. lol
__________________
There's no such thing as a Submariner No Date, it's simply Submariner. You don't call a Porsche 911 Turbo, a Porsche 911 Turbo No S. www.instagram.com/sutatshorology Post Your Rolex/Tudor Watch Weight (PYRTWW) |
3 August 2017, 12:03 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Miami *305*
Watch: 114060/116710BLNR
Posts: 903
|
No point in that honestly.
|
3 August 2017, 12:04 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Watch: GMT
Posts: 8,254
|
Cheers everyone
|
3 August 2017, 12:06 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London/Asia
Watch: GMT LN/SD43/D Blue
Posts: 872
|
Would keep the one you have and with 6600 quid by a different model
|
3 August 2017, 12:08 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Watch: GMT
Posts: 8,254
|
|
3 August 2017, 12:58 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Taiwan
Watch: Rolex BLNR
Posts: 2,308
|
I know what you think: This is really a good way that you can get a BNIB BLNR and enjoy the happiness of flipping old for new one without a loss.
|
3 August 2017, 01:10 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Montreal
Posts: 432
|
Unless it's an easy risk free sale (in the sense that you don't get mugged or screwed on ebay by a buyer opening a not as described claim or something), I definitely wouldn't bother.
But ya, if it's an easy (risk free) sale, and especially if you tend to flip watches, i dont see why not, i feel like you can fetch more in a few years for a 2017 watch than at 2014 (even if it's beyond the 5 year warranty period) Would be more tempting if your current watch had blemishes or something |
3 August 2017, 01:23 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Dave
Location: E.U.
Watch: ing the GBP fall.
Posts: 320
|
Well I'll keep it simple.
If it costs nothing, then why not? Some folks do it with cars, why not with watches, if that's what you want ? In addition, you are buying "more" from your AD. Keeps that special relationship going |
3 August 2017, 01:49 AM | #28 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: _
Posts: 1,877
|
Quote:
|
|
3 August 2017, 01:49 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Watch: GMT
Posts: 8,254
|
Thanks guys.
Yeh it's a tough one as it would cost to change but only a few hundred £. I'm not overly fussed either way as I live the BLNR I have got. Just wondered if the longer service intervals and warranty were worth the swap and many of the questions have been addressed. |
3 August 2017, 01:56 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
|
It would cost you a few bucks trading it in to the dealer or selling privately?
I thought SS pieces were tough to find in the UK? If so, maybe you can breakout even selling it privately?
__________________
|
Tags |
opinions , wwyd |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.