ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
13 August 2012, 05:19 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Location: On Earth
Watch: 228238, 114060
Posts: 1,347
|
SD for a PO 8500? Huh?
I know most would say don't do it, but ever since I saw the new PO in person I really want it.
Actually thought about giving up my SD for one. Crazy or not crazy? |
13 August 2012, 05:33 PM | #2 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 X2 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: ATX
Posts: 2,881
|
not even.
|
13 August 2012, 05:36 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Bert
Location: philippines
Watch: 116710 ln
Posts: 3,443
|
no i wouldn't do it. SD is a classic. the 8500 is cheap in comparison very much within saving reach.
|
13 August 2012, 06:45 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Here and there
Posts: 12,485
|
i'd keep the SD... and add the PO when funds allow
it'll be so much sweeter
__________________
Fine Quality is Long Remembered After the Pain of Spending Money is Forgotten |
13 August 2012, 09:40 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: EU
Watch: ing TRF
Posts: 576
|
The PO is of greater quality than a SD 16600. The 16600 was designed over 25 years ago (well case and bracelet is from 16660, so almost 30 years old), so offcurse a new watch will be superior
However the SD is a watch which has "that something". Keep it, and buy the PO when you have the funds. |
13 August 2012, 09:44 PM | #6 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,753
|
If the SD is your only Rolex then the answer is no. If you have another Rolex, trade the SD in and have a ball. The new PO is great.
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982- |
13 August 2012, 09:48 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: A.K.W
Location: Indonesia
Watch: Me Watching U
Posts: 587
|
SD is a great ref. In rolex. Think again mate.
|
13 August 2012, 09:52 PM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 3,185
|
I've always considered the SD to be THE Rolex diver and it was my grail. I was blessed to locate this one LNIB:
and wore it with pride. Then along came my Planet Ocean Liquidmetal LE and it won the wrist time war. But would I have given up the SD for the new 8500 PO or even the standard PO? Probably not. Of course, I would not give up my PO LM LE either. Fr. John† |
13 August 2012, 11:55 PM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Balkans
Watch: Rolex Sea-Dweller
Posts: 49
|
The SD (16600) is a true classic, like the Speedy Pro . I'd suggest you keep the SD and add the 8500 as a companion.
|
14 August 2012, 01:34 AM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Location: On Earth
Watch: 228238, 114060
Posts: 1,347
|
All great input guys. Thanks for your opinions.
Tough call. I really want this new PO, but perhaps I should just wait and hold on to my SD. That new PO is so awesome though! |
14 August 2012, 02:38 PM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: BermudaAntarctica
Posts: 892
|
if ur SD is in bad shape then maybe. ;)
|
14 August 2012, 02:40 PM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Location: On Earth
Watch: 228238, 114060
Posts: 1,347
|
|
14 August 2012, 09:56 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Mark
Location: Toronto, Canada.
Watch: SD / LV / Daytona
Posts: 2,089
|
Nooooo ....
Keep the SD and save a little longer.
|
14 August 2012, 10:08 PM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: ny
Posts: 240
|
Quote:
is nothing compared to one of these I know I'd much rather ride in the new, modern, 'murican one than that dated Italian purebred, I'm sure you agree.
__________________
-All of my photos can be seen in higher resolution by going to "Actions" and then "View all sizes" on the flickr page. -Please send me an email at jmp9099@gmail.com and I will respond with links to my reference threads. -I can usually respond more quickly to emails than PMs -If photos in any of my listings are not showing up properly please consider that listing void / that this is equivalent to my responding to the post with "on hold" or "no longer available" |
|
14 August 2012, 10:28 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
|
Keep SD and save
|
14 August 2012, 10:37 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: jeff
Location: PA
Watch: panerai, tt blue
Posts: 23
|
|
14 August 2012, 10:38 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Zack
Location: OC, SoCal
Posts: 1,362
|
__________________
Thank you, -Zack Ji 2FA on TRF enabled |
14 August 2012, 10:59 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Brian
Location: NY
Watch: DJ2, BLNR, PO, Nav
Posts: 606
|
I love the SD and the PO, I like that you say the SD is analogous to a Ferrari Testarossa, but the PO to a riced out Mustang, that's a stretch
|
15 August 2012, 02:15 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Asad A. Awan
Location: kabul, Afghanista
Watch: Tissot PRX
Posts: 2,698
|
I only think you should wear what you want and I can clearly see that you really want a new PO ...though in my own opinion, keep the SD and add the PO when funds allow, but in any case, if you want the PO in place of the SD, please go ahead by all means..I know many people that sold SDs for many other replacements over the years :)
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.