The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex Watch Reviews

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29 May 2012, 09:56 PM   #1
Nav01L
"TRF" Member
 
Nav01L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Fred
Location: Zurich
Posts: 2,697
One month with the GMT-C

This is a cross posting from Breitlingsource, but I thought it might be of interest here too:

It has been a month now since, through a pleasant course of events, a Rolex came to join my collection.

Now, after wearing it extensively, I'd like to give a first report.

You may of course ask how and why that has anything to do with Breitling, but bear with me, there is a connection... One other than me sitting in a train from Geneva to Grenchen via Biel right now while I'm typing this...

Well anyhow, the watch then:

First, I'd like to comment on its personality, which is why I chose it. After that, I'll come to user experience day to day.

The GMT, and here's where the Breitling connection becomes apparent, has profound roots in aviation. It is thus all the less surprising that it's key feature has been perpetuated in Rolexes latest, openly aviation themed addition, the Sky Dweller.

The GMT was indeed originally commissioned by PanAm, for its pilots... Or at least, that's what the legend says. It has later on gained popularity with the Huey pilots of the Vietnam war.

Within the Rolex lineup then, it is the watch that would appeal to someone who has found his grail watch in the Navitimer... And thus, it appealed to me immediately.

In this light, one can also comprehend the quite polarizing, or so it seems, polished center links. To me, the shiny stripe along the bracelet subtly evokes the golden stripes along an airline captain's cuffs. Granted, at first I was skeptical... Too bling bling and too out of touch with the general design language of the piece were the elements in question. So much so that I almost asked my AD to strap an all brushed submariner's bracelet onto the watch instead. With time though, the bling was toned down by wear and the polished stripe grew on me to the point where I wouldn't like to miss it now.

The rest of the aesthetics is, admittedly quite easy listening, in that the look, borrowed in large bits from the Sub, has long since become emblematic (ice-watch anyone?).

Some details are worth noting however. The fact that a dive watch would make its way to the skies would seem uncanny at first. However, the thing is, what makes a good dive watch is not too different from what makes a pilots watch: instant readability (let's call that the Chronomat effect). This is where the maxi dial deserves a mention. The bigger lume-blobs make the watch almost easier to read than my Pam... And that means a whole lot more readable than an IWC big Pilot, which in that department is no slouch either. Unlike other Rolexes (read: Explorer I), the updated dial also means updated hands which have grown with the watche's diameter instead of remaining strangely small and thus out of proportion with the new and larger case... Another box chequed in my book.

A further key feature is the 24 hour bezel. First off, the ceramic insert is some sight to see... It is properly magnificent. That is, it isn't without it's weaknesses. The numbers go from single to double digit, which makes things somewhat unbalanced around the 24 triangle... With one 2 on the one side and two 2s on the other. Furthermore, the bezel comes in any color so long as it's black. Amateurs of the Pepsi bezel may therefore feel a bit let down. That is, I like the low-key look. Plus, the strong reflectivity of the polished ceramics gives it a great variety of hues depending on the lighting, going from polished steel to gunmetal to deep black.

The high reflectivity of the bezel also fits the missing AR coating (Rolex tradition, very disputed, I know, but let's not go into that issue) on the crystal and the equally reflective polished center links of the bracelet (which often look black when the lighting is poor).

Remaining with the subject of the watch face, the GMT-C also lost the red highlights on the dial (GMT-hand) in favor of a more subdued green.

Altogether then, bezel and dial make for a discrete but distinctive, highly readable yet precise, and most importantly, at least to me, very pretty ensemble. If anything, it may be a bit too reflective... But one gets over that.

I am then, very happy with my little Rollie, which brings me to usage.

With my Navi, which I love beyond reason, I am always aware of its presence on my wrist, be it because I'm consumed by its magnificence when I look at it or because I'm constantly panicked to bump it into something.

In that, the more easy listening character of the GMT is quite relieving. It just becomes the part of my arm that tells time. It doesn't have the delicacy of the Navi and thus does not solicit my protective instinct that much. Yet, it still maintains the aviation DNA that I value so much in my Navi.

can and do wear it every day, something that I don't quite feel comfortable doing with the Navi.

And as an added benefit, the 24 hour bezel turned out to be of great use last week during the 24h race at the Nürburgring which I visit every year. It will be no less so for Le Mans in a couple of days :)

Images to come...
__________________
Greetings from Switzerland

Remember, the dignity you surrender at your AD‘s doorstep will never be recovered by wearing the watch he may get you.
Nav01L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 May 2012, 03:55 AM   #2
Enoch
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 294
Great write up...

I too have recently acquired a GMT c...... And I have to say that after my LV..it's a real hit with me....
Enoch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 May 2012, 04:33 AM   #3
DCgator
"TRF" Member
 
DCgator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: PNW
Watch: DS,BLNR,SubLV,DJ2
Posts: 8,123
Icon6

I love GMT models! Thanks for the review.
DCgator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 May 2012, 11:58 AM   #4
golden_unicorn
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Diego, USA
Watch: GMT IIc, Datejust
Posts: 5
Good writing. Bought one in 2009 when it was still hard to find. Love the style, and the easy-link.
golden_unicorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 June 2012, 02:08 AM   #5
sea-dweller
"TRF" Member
 
sea-dweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
Nice review!
sea-dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 June 2012, 07:47 AM   #6
camillus
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 46
I still cannot decide between GMT II and GMT II C. Love both, but not everything about them. Every review I read just makes me confused more. ggrrrrrr :((
camillus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 June 2012, 08:26 AM   #7
closetothebrink
"TRF" Member
 
closetothebrink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 156
Interesting read. Thanks for taking he time to share your thoughts. And enjoy the GMT
closetothebrink is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 June 2012, 09:54 AM   #8
mv6187
"TRF" Member
 
mv6187's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Jake C
Location: San Francisco
Watch: 116610LN, 116613LB
Posts: 286
Quote:
Originally Posted by camillus View Post
I still cannot decide between GMT II and GMT II C. Love both, but not everything about them. Every review I read just makes me confused more. ggrrrrrr :((
I've owned both. Loved the older Rolex but it has nothin on how much I love staring at the new C. If my opinion means anything, go for the C. Hate me and blame me if you regret it.. :)
__________________
mv6187 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 June 2012, 09:58 PM   #9
SeaDweller50
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Sandy
Location: England.
Watch: 14060M 2 liner
Posts: 3,204
Brilliant review, thanks. You've talked me into getting one.
SeaDweller50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 June 2012, 01:19 AM   #10
rickyslam
"TRF" Member
 
rickyslam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Ricky
Location: City of Sin
Watch: Hulk, DaytonaC, DJ
Posts: 1,149
Lets see those pics!
rickyslam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 June 2012, 05:23 AM   #11
A.J.R.
"TRF" Member
 
A.J.R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: AJ
Location: Oregon
Watch: SUBC, DJII
Posts: 1,827
Makes me want a GMTC more and more.
__________________
[<a href=http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i202/tonelar/watches/club/soc.jpg target=_blank>http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i2...s/club/soc.jpg</a>
A.J.R. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 June 2012, 07:04 AM   #12
GermanyMatt
"TRF" Member
 
GermanyMatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Matt
Location: Northern VA
Watch: 126711, 126610
Posts: 1,803
I love my two week old GMT IIc; it's just a dead sexy watch. Had it and a Sub-c on my wrist at the AD dealer and the GMT stayed on my wrist.
GermanyMatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2012, 05:40 PM   #13
cc75
"TRF" Member
 
cc75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Cédric
Location: Paris
Watch: Skydweller
Posts: 319
It's my first Rolex and this watch is just beautiful.
Unfortunately the watch is at a watchmaker to be polished.
I scratched the horns badly when replacing my brace.
I have to wait until next week.
I'am sad....
cc75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.