ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
27 October 2020, 07:32 AM | #61 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 593
|
Out of the two I prefer the 47mm. Have tried it on a few times now and it is the 47mm that I think is better. Have not pulled the trigger yet but it is one that I want to add to my collection.
|
27 October 2020, 08:33 AM | #62 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 63,401
|
Good call.
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
31 October 2020, 09:55 PM | #63 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 102
|
I like my 1389 alot.... And it's running about +1 second a day, which is extremely accurate
|
4 November 2020, 08:26 AM | #64 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: City of Angels
Watch: $500 Tourbillon
Posts: 109
|
42 for me
I have a 7" wrist and i personally found the 47mm watches to be a bit too bulky.
my first "luxury" watch was a radiomir and I stuck around that size for some time because i think i just felt obliged due to the money I had to pay. lol 42 and under wears a lot better for me and dont hit it around too much. |
10 November 2020, 10:14 PM | #65 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 593
|
|
11 November 2020, 09:03 AM | #66 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: St. Paul, MN
Watch: GMT II, Pam 685
Posts: 116
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.