The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26 November 2020, 01:01 PM   #31
csaltphoto
"TRF" Member
 
csaltphoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: US
Watch: sub
Posts: 2,293
It doesn't seem to have a mark on it so it has more than likely been polished. Maybe a new bezel as well. If polished the bevels were maintained, inside the lugs are sharp, brushing on lugs is correct. Rather than a full polish it might have had surface stuff buffed out and re-brushed. It looks very nice.
csaltphoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2020, 02:13 PM   #32
Boaters
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD
Posts: 10,649
A very nice example I would buy it
Boaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2020, 04:25 PM   #33
Verdi
"TRF" Member
 
Verdi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mitch
Location: UAE
Watch: Big Ben
Posts: 2,451
I like it. The lugs are fat enough for me. Its an honest watch.

Most of watches offered by dealers are polished before being displayed. The general public likes a shiny watch, not scratched.
__________________
IG: @watch_idiot_savant
Verdi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2020, 04:38 PM   #34
danipan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: London
Posts: 52
I appreciate everyone taking the time to reply. I called the dealer yesterday afternoon, but unfortunately for me it had already sold. Guess you snooze you lose.

I've noticed in the last couple of months since I've been searching for the right 16710, a lot of them are getting snapped up.
Not long ago, doing a search on chrono24 for 2004-07 pieces in V.Good condition in the UK would bring up 30 or so, now there's currently only a dozen available. Strange given lockdown and covid.

But I guess the search continues for me...
danipan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2020, 04:41 PM   #35
Andad
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 36,798
Sorry you missed it but I did give you your answer one minute after you posted.

The bezel looked unpolished as did the crown guards.

I’m sure another nice one will pop up.
__________________
E

Andad is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2020, 10:22 PM   #36
kauffee
2024 ROLEX DATE-JUST41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: 116610LN, 116500LN
Posts: 1,379
Looks really good. I always look at the teeth of the bezel, too, and if you told me they were unpolished I’d believe it. Jump on that fine looking watch!
kauffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2020, 10:43 PM   #37
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,758
Falls into the too imperceptible to give a stuff bracket. The box is concerning. It's too old for the watch.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2020, 01:31 AM   #38
PepsiBezel
2024 Pledge Member
 
PepsiBezel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: USA
Watch: Neo-Vintage
Posts: 1,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onikage View Post
Falls into the too imperceptible to give a stuff bracket. The box is concerning. It's too old for the watch.
It’s the correct box for a no-holes F-serial.

Granted, boxes are the easiest thing for a seller to add to a watch.
PepsiBezel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2020, 02:31 AM   #39
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,758
Icon14

Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryFlashman View Post
It’s the correct box for a no-holes F-serial.

Granted, boxes are the easiest thing for a seller to add to a watch.
Definitely late use of the wooden type if that's the case. My mistake. Hey if the OP is paying box and papers money he wants the right box!
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2020, 05:17 AM   #40
Chadridv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Chadridv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,343
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin of Larchmont View Post
Are you putting it in a museum or are you going to wear it? If you are going to wear it then it looks great. If you are going to put it in a museum then it looks OK. The more relevant questions are do you like it, do you want it and can you afford it? A forum can’t help you with those answers.
I don’t think the sarcasm helps and I think you might be missing the point. The OP says he lacks experience in identifying an over polished watch, which to a minimal degree might not make any difference in the enjoyment and functionality of the watch, however it could make a significant difference in the cost and value of the watch. Hence the statement “just don’t want to be over paying”.

That said, the watch looks pretty good but clearly does look polished to me. If you do a quick look on watchrecon not only will you be able to get a grasp on the market value for this reference, but you’ll also be able to see how pricing varies for unpolished examples. Additionally if you dig deep enough, you can probably make photo comparisons between polished watches that maintain original shape and chamfers vs polished watches that have clearly been polished, as well as the subtle price differences that go along with them.
Chadridv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2020, 09:26 AM   #41
Bruno007
"TRF" Member
 
Bruno007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Real Name: Jaime
Location: Washington
Watch: 116613LB "Bluesy"
Posts: 214
It looks pretty good to me. I just received mine back from service and it looks similar. I would not worry about purchasing it.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg pepsi1.jpg (242.1 KB, 72 views)
File Type: jpg pepsi3.jpg (193.6 KB, 71 views)
Bruno007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2020, 09:35 AM   #42
HogwldFLTR
2024 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: What's on my wrist
Posts: 33,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruno007 View Post
It looks pretty good to me. I just received mine back from service and it looks similar. I would not worry about purchasing it.
If the price is right I'd worry about not purchasing!!!
__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2020, 09:43 AM   #43
Lol-x
Facilitator
 
Lol-x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Omnipresent
Posts: 33,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
Looks like a fine example most used Rolex would of had a light polish before sale at most all retailers and lugs on the crown side are always a fraction thinner even from new.
I never knew that, is that a factory glitch?
__________________

Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be. ~Abraham Lincoln
Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy

ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim
Lol-x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2020, 10:17 AM   #44
SeaAndSky
"TRF" Member
 
SeaAndSky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Wild Blue Yonder
Watch: 116710 LN
Posts: 1,613
Looks great. There is absolutely nothing wrong with polishing if that’s your preference. I get that we are wis people but the polishing versus no polishing is silly in my opinion. Do what you like.
SeaAndSky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 November 2020, 03:22 AM   #45
rtalk
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Seattle
Watch: 16710T
Posts: 547
Advice from polishing experts...

The one thing to consider is whether the dial is service or not.

Read this to get the scoop. Essentially, if it has a holes case and the dial isn’t tritium, it is most likely a service dial (but not always). Read this for timelines about the transitions.

http://www.gmtmasterhistory.com/gmt-...ref_16710.html


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
116519 Grey dial Oysterflex Daytona. 116500 Black. 116710BLNR. 16710T. Rolex Explorer I 39MM. 4 digit DateJust. JLC Master Control with Sector Dial. Omega FOIS. Grand Seiko Four Seasons (Spring Version). Tudor Royal. IWC Cal 83 (~1940s). 41MM sub. Omega CK859.
rtalk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.