ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

LeslieC · 7 July 2012, 02:22 PM

It worked when I asked for a 114060 review so I thought I may as well ask about this model.

GlobalGooch69 · 7 July 2012, 03:14 PM

IMO not attractive, bezel is to think and no exciting dial options. i personally prefer a 116334 and get the blingy white gold bezel. not a pretty watch for the money go with 116334.

seanthome · 11 July 2012, 03:37 AM

I saw the 116300 in the store. Only the silver and black dials. They look nice to me. I never really liked the 116334. The gold bezel just looked odd to me, and seemed like an overt attempt to add bling to the watch. Really unrefined looking. The 116300 looks much more clean with the regular bezel. Dials are the same between the two models. So just look at both and see which you prefer.

7 July 2012, 02:22 PM	#1
LeslieC "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2012 Real Name: Leslie Location: Canada Watch: 14000, 116710 Posts: 465	Any 116300 Reviews? It worked when I asked for a 114060 review so I thought I may as well ask about this model.

7 July 2012, 03:14 PM	#2
GlobalGooch69 Banned Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: USA Posts: 116	IMO not attractive, bezel is to think and no exciting dial options. i personally prefer a 116334 and get the blingy white gold bezel. not a pretty watch for the money go with 116334.

11 July 2012, 03:37 AM	#3
seanthome "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 67	I saw the 116300 in the store. Only the silver and black dials. They look nice to me. I never really liked the 116334. The gold bezel just looked odd to me, and seemed like an overt attempt to add bling to the watch. Really unrefined looking. The 116300 looks much more clean with the regular bezel. Dials are the same between the two models. So just look at both and see which you prefer.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)