The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 22 July 2019, 05:06 AM   #61
holdtime
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Planet Earth.
Posts: 582
Better pic of 15450


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
holdtime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2019, 01:13 PM   #62
grievor
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Singapore
Posts: 198
This is one piece you got to try in person before deciding if you like it or not...I did so at the boutique and immediately knew it wasnt for me. Those with smaller wrists would probably appreciate it more, otherwise go for the 15400/15500.
grievor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2019, 07:01 AM   #63
holdtime
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Planet Earth.
Posts: 582
Had both 15400 is huge.
15450 just right.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
holdtime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2019, 04:41 PM   #64
Mike Jab
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: London
Posts: 265
I hope not as it’s purely a female watch (like the female offshore version). Just look at its variants full of diamonds and all colors-proof that it’s for females.
Mike Jab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2019, 05:01 PM   #65
grievor
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Singapore
Posts: 198
Quote:
Originally Posted by holdtime View Post
Had both 15400 is huge.
15450 just right.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fit is merely a perspective and preference. Great that there are options!
grievor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 July 2019, 02:00 AM   #66
holdtime
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Planet Earth.
Posts: 582
Quote:
Originally Posted by grievor View Post
Fit is merely a perspective and preference. Great that there are options!


Fit is realistic,size is perspective.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
holdtime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 July 2019, 02:42 AM   #67
Rockland
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 187
Tried one on an hour ago. Have 7.25 wrist. Way too small for me.
Rockland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2019, 08:51 AM   #68
holdtime
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Planet Earth.
Posts: 582
Quote:
Originally Posted by RolexZen View Post
Yes, this discussion of the 15450 having a tiny dial surprises me. I think the dial diameter may not be any smaller than on a Sub or GMT Master. Can someone give us the dimensions across the crystals?
27.5mm 15450 Dial
holdtime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 July 2019, 10:27 PM   #69
jojo
"TRF" Member
 
jojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: louisville
Posts: 37
IMO 39mm suit most of the people.
jojo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 July 2019, 11:27 PM   #70
Muxi
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,823
Fits my 6.7 inch wrist perfectly. I would try this in the metal first before deciding.
Muxi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 July 2019, 03:58 AM   #71
holdtime
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Planet Earth.
Posts: 582
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojo View Post
IMO 39mm suit most of the people.


Agree,but hard to get. And way overpriced.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
holdtime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2020, 10:47 PM   #72
TankTom
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: UK
Posts: 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyler1980 View Post
IMO anything sub 40mm and its a psychological barrier so no its not the next big hype.

Hipsters at hodinkee are the only ones who truly embrace the sub 40mm's

Look at the 5711 and 15202. One is listed at 40mm and one at 39mm. The AP always gets more people worried about the size and it wears bigger than the patek, but its the specs that people get turned off on.

Im all for buying what fits... but a lot of people look at the size on paper and then think thats what then need and then force it. Not to mention the 15450 IMO is too thick for its case dimensions. Its small and thick vs the larger 41mm with the same thickness which gives the appearance of a thinner watch. It wears different and isn't just a smaller 41mm as not everything was scaled down
Your thickness comment is untrue. At 9.8mm, it’s still way thinner than most other sport watches.
TankTom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2020, 03:21 AM   #73
joe240
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: california
Posts: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by TooWoundUp View Post
I think they could solve all of this by bringing back the 15300 case with the new in house movement.
Yes!!! Hopefully A.P. will listen to us as per Mr Biver we are a king.
joe240 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2020, 05:05 AM   #74
WatchBrothersLondon
2024 Pledge Member
 
WatchBrothersLondon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Real Name: Ben
Location: London, UK
Posts: 589
15450 is a great piece however I'd be turning my attention to the 14790, similar size range but retains more of the classic 5402 proportions, stunning 7.5mm thin case and semi-vintage appeal depending on the variant.
WatchBrothersLondon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2020, 04:00 PM   #75
Jsol
"TRF" Member
 
Jsol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Joyce
Location: SF and NYC
Watch: GMT, AP, DD,
Posts: 641
Having had a 15450, I’m now utterly bewitched by the vintage 25594 reference. Similar size case but Jumbo like thinness and sexy complications like the Day-date and moonphase.





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
IG @crownthewatch
Jsol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2020, 04:38 PM   #76
WatchBrothersLondon
2024 Pledge Member
 
WatchBrothersLondon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Real Name: Ben
Location: London, UK
Posts: 589
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jsol View Post
Having had a 15450, I’m now utterly bewitched by the vintage 25594 reference. Similar size case but Jumbo like thinness and sexy complications like the Day-date and moonphase.





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This is an incredible early example. Such a gorgeous piece!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
WatchBrothersLondon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2020, 09:24 PM   #77
Benzsiam
2024 Pledge Member
 
Benzsiam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/AP/PP/ALS
Posts: 5,914
Quote:
Originally Posted by P2725TMB View Post
I don't think there's any right or wrong or incorrect choice, its all down to personal preference and to a degree what you're used to seeing. Nowadays I'm used to big watches and can't imagine myself wearing anything smaller than a 41, it just looks too small - to me.

However many years ago, before I was in the fortunate position of being able to obtain higher end pieces, the watches I had were smaller, such as the TAG Heuer 6000 series, which to me then looked perfect. But now it would look (to me) too small.
You're absolutely right.
All the dealers will be very happy to sell whatever you want. Some dealer might mention that 15450 was for women, because of the bracelet length. If you like it, they will be very happy to sell it to you, but if your wrist size is bigger than 6.6 inches, you will need to add additional links to fit your wrist. When they design the watches, they intend to design to fit the majority without adding additional links, more likely take some links out. Most women have a smaller wrist than 6.6 inches, that was why 15450 model comes with the shorter bracelet length than 15400 model.
Benzsiam is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.