ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

vipereaper30 · 1 July 2019, 02:36 AM

It doesn't wear thick to me and I've been lucky with no date issue during a year of ownership. It's probably the best GMT for the money. Other than style I often find myself struggling to justify the current Rolex when it comes down to the which to wear decision.

Dan Pierce · 1 July 2019, 03:24 AM

Just bought a bracelet for my GMT. Love having options.
dP

fullofboats · 1 July 2019, 03:38 AM

That BC strap looks amazing Dan. Could I bother you to share the model # or where you got it from? The BC website isn't the most consumer friendly and doesn't seem to have any shopping options or retailer details

Dan Pierce · 1 July 2019, 05:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fullofboats

That BC strap looks amazing Dan. Could I bother you to share the model # or where you got it from? The BC website isn't the most consumer friendly and doesn't seem to have any shopping options or retailer details

Thanks, Jimmy!

It's a BC 400CT from Watchgecko:
https://www.watchgecko.com/zuludiver...rs-watch-strap

They're in the UK, I'm un the US and delivery only took 3 days.

Got the end links from SmartyJones:
http://www.smartyendlinks.com

If using the end links you will have to sand down the springboard end a bit to get it to fit. Just take some fine sandpaper and rub the springboard end radius a little bit at a time. Doesn't take very long and don't over do it.

You'll love that combo!

dP

Beckster · 1 July 2019, 11:31 AM

Excellent watch for sure. Great value for money. Love the vintage vibe but with modern features. Timekeeping is super. Cannot recommend it enough. Initially I didn't like it after reading reviews and looking at the pictures. But after trying it on at an AD, I was sold. Maybe because I tried it on the leather strap and it was different to the other Rolex watches I have which are mostly on the steel bracelet.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

grimlock525 · 1 July 2019, 01:28 PM

So just how widespread is this date issue that people have mentioned? I did some googling and it seems like it mostly affects early production models? If I get mine in 3-4 months as estimated by the AD, will it most likely have the fixed movement that people claim was implemented to address the issue?

Freelance · 1 July 2019, 02:59 PM

I have smallish wrists 6.8", and the BB's fit me fine. The nice thing is the lug-to-lug is reasonable, so other than height/thickness, it wears well. The clasp could be more comfortable on their bracelet (wish it had a Pelagos clasp) but it's minor.

palin · 2 July 2019, 01:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grimlock525

So just how widespread is this date issue that people have mentioned? I did some googling and it seems like it mostly affects early production models? If I get mine in 3-4 months as estimated by the AD, will it most likely have the fixed movement that people claim was implemented to address the issue?

I bought mine brand new from AD in March this year. It had the date issue and I sent in RSC. Initially, I was told an 8 weeks wait for a new movement change but barely 2 weeks I had gotten the call to pick it up. Another contact of mine whom bought around the same time also encounter same issue thus I do not think the newer batch will be free from trouble.

sagla · 2 July 2019, 01:37 AM

It is a great watch. Built like a real tool watch. Wear it on every occasion. I love it. Very good looking one. Imho, buy it without any hesitation!

samson66 · 2 July 2019, 04:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grimlock525

So just how widespread is this date issue that people have mentioned? I did some googling and it seems like it mostly affects early production models? If I get mine in 3-4 months as estimated by the AD, will it most likely have the fixed movement that people claim was implemented to address the issue?

Generally the older ones have the issue. Mine was purchased in December and has not had any issues (knock on wood) however it most likely depends on the production date and there may be some early production models still floating around out there.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S10 using Tapatalk

grimlock525 · 2 July 2019, 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by palin

I bought mine brand new from AD in March this year. It had the date issue and I sent in RSC. Initially, I was told an 8 weeks wait for a new movement change but barely 2 weeks I had gotten the call to pick it up. Another contact of mine whom bought around the same time also encounter same issue thus I do not think the newer batch will be free from trouble.

Hmm, not exactly reassuring but I guess worst case I'll just have to go without for a few weeks if it needs to be fixed. You figure this would be something that they would have tried to correct ASAP in their production line.

samson66 · 2 July 2019, 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan Pierce

Just bought a bracelet for my GMT. Love having options.
dP

How much did they charge for the bracelet Dan? I may add one at some point too.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S10 using Tapatalk

FloridaSam · 2 July 2019, 07:32 PM

On The Tudor site the difference between the Nato and the Bracelet model is $325.00. I'm guessing $350-475?

sekpaul · 2 July 2019, 08:25 PM

I bought a bracelet. Think it was about AUD$600.

F740505D-00C1-40AD-986E-508C4F0D7AD0.jpg

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

sekpaul · 2 July 2019, 08:26 PM

Leather is a lot lighter too

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

MindMatter · 2 July 2019, 08:43 PM

I'm going to wait until the movement issues and production has ramped up, but then yes I'll be getting one.

Dan Pierce · 2 July 2019, 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by samson66

How much did they charge for the bracelet Dan? I may add one at some point too.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S10 using Tapatalk

Been keeping an eye out for any for sale and finally found one slightly used for much less than new. Really just needed the end links since the THC bracelet is exactly the same but finding those separately is even harder. Due to the July 4th Holiday I'll see it next week.
dP

Oldwoods · 21 July 2019, 11:26 PM

Picked up my GMT this week. Looks great on bracelet and either blue or brown leather straps.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Jona · 22 July 2019, 12:53 AM

I lucked out at the AD last week as one had just arrived and the guy at the top of the list declined it. I ordered the Tudor leather strap and deployant which should arrive in about 2 weeks. I am very pleased with the watch. No date change issue, and I like the no PCL look. Price less than half of the Rolex GMT which is a lot tougher to find at MSRP.

Dan Pierce · 22 July 2019, 01:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by samson66

How much did they charge for the bracelet Dan? I may add one at some point too.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S10 using Tapatalk

Mike, the first bracelet I bought [2nd hand] turned out to be a fake. And a pretty good one at that. The seller was a standup guy and immediately took it back for a full refund.

Then I found a rivet [2nd hand] which is the proper bracelet for the GMT. Lucky for me it all worked out in the end.
dP

Wristwatchin · 22 July 2019, 04:42 AM

I love mine. Prefect for dress or causal use. Mine is on a steel bracelet, it’s a bit thicker and heavier than my explorer ii(ref:216570) but overall build quality is superb. Best watch for 4K IMO.

daOnlyBG · 22 July 2019, 04:47 AM

I really dig the crystal.

samson66 · 22 July 2019, 04:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan Pierce

Mike, the first bracelet I bought [2nd hand] turned out to be a fake. And a pretty good one at that. The seller was a standup guy and immediately took it back for a full refund.

Then I found a rivet [2nd hand] which is the proper bracelet for the GMT. Lucky for me it all worked out in the end.
dP

Wow, really? They were selling a fake bracelet? Glad to hear the seller did the right thing. Do you have any pictures of it? Curious to see how close it looks.

I'm trying to source an OEM bracelet for mine. Any suggestions on where to look?

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S10 using Tapatalk

Ssunnylee24 · 22 July 2019, 04:59 AM

Unfortunately, I had to sell mine but it was a hell of a watch.

Dan Pierce · 22 July 2019, 05:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by samson66

Wow, really? They were selling a fake bracelet? Glad to hear the seller did the right thing. Do you have any pictures of it? Curious to see how close it looks.

I'm trying to source an OEM bracelet for mine. Any suggestions on where to look?

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S10 using Tapatalk

I just happened to be lucky enough to find a couple on WUS & Ebay at the same time. That's where I'd look.

In the first pic you see the difference in the safety clasp hinge, fake on the right, original on the left.

In the second pic the machining of the deployant is not as precise as seen inside the Tudor shield cutout [fake on top, original on bottom]. Also the connecting pin on the opposite side protrudes out and is not as finely detailed.

The third pic shows the difference in the finger catch, with a sharper angle arch on the original [bottom] vs fake [top].

My suspicions were confirmed when I found another fake bracelet for sale with the exact same clasp date code.
dP

Etschell · 22 July 2019, 05:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JayHantz

I love everything about it. I travel extensively for work over long periods of time and the GMT is my daily wear on these trips. It usually is on a NATO, but these look killer on anything: leather strap, NATO, or bracelet. I love the smaller markers that harken to older five digits, I love the aluminum bezel and the guard-less crown. Speaking of the bezel, I love that it’s a 48 click than the 24 click of the Rolex, which allows me to offset correctly when in one of those weird 30 minute offset timezones (which I do run into). It’s rugged, can take a beating, and brings a smile to my face every time I look at it.

A downside is it is chunky. At 14mm or so in thickness, it isn’t as slim as the GMT II. I don’t mind too much, as it’s really more of a tool watch for the field than a board room.

I recommend it. And I think you’ll be really happy with it.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Chunky but compact. That is why nearly anyone can wear one.

samson66 · 22 July 2019, 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan Pierce

I just happened to be lucky enough to find a couple on WUS & Ebay at the same time. That's where I'd look.

In the first pic you see the difference in the safety clasp hinge, fake on the right, original on the left.

In the second pic the machining of the deployant is not as precise as seen inside the Tudor shield cutout [fake on top, original on bottom]. Also the connecting pin on the opposite side protrudes out and is not as finely detailed.

The third pic shows the difference in the finger catch, with a sharper angle arch on the original [bottom] vs fake [top].

My suspicions were confirmed when I found another fake bracelet for sale with the exact same clasp date code.
dP

This is a real eye opener, thanks for posting. That just shows how good these fakes can be. I'm not sure I would have any idea if I didn't have a real one to compare to it. Think of how many they have sold where the owner has no clue. To me, looking at it, the only thing I would say looks "off" is the finger catch. But again without a real one to look at I'm not sure I would have picked up on it.

This is making me think maybe I just bite the bullet and buy from the AD

Dan Pierce · 22 July 2019, 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by samson66

This is a real eye opener, thanks for posting. That just shows how good these fakes can be. I'm not sure I would have any idea if I didn't have a real one to compare to it. Think of how many they have sold where the owner has no clue. To me, looking at it, the only thing I would say looks "off" is the finger catch. But again without a real one to look at I'm not sure I would have picked up on it.

This is making me think maybe I just bite the bullet and buy from the AD

No question having my THC bracelet available to compare was extremely helpful.

dP

konkaniman · 22 July 2019, 10:16 PM

Is lack of quick set date bothersome? Not sure I've had a watch without quick set date.

derekhayden · 22 July 2019, 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by konkaniman

Is lack of quick set date bothersome? Not sure I've had a watch without quick set date.

It doesn't bother me since it has the independent hour hand which makes setting the date a bit faster.

1 July 2019, 03:24 AM	#32
Dan Pierce 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: D'OH! Location: Kentucky Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3 Posts: 35,733	Just bought a bracelet for my GMT. Love having options. dP __________________ TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club

1 July 2019, 11:31 AM	#35
Beckster "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2017 Location: Singapore Watch: 16710 BLRO Posts: 836	Excellent watch for sure. Great value for money. Love the vintage vibe but with modern features. Timekeeping is super. Cannot recommend it enough. Initially I didn't like it after reading reviews and looking at the pictures. But after trying it on at an AD, I was sold. Maybe because I tried it on the leather strap and it was different to the other Rolex watches I have which are mostly on the steel bracelet. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ Rolex Only Please

21 July 2019, 11:26 PM	#48
Oldwoods "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2018 Location: Scotland Watch: Rolex Hulk Posts: 436	Picked up my GMT this week. Looks great on bracelet and either blue or brown leather straps. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk __________________ Enjoying: Daytona, Submariner Hulk, Bluesy, Seadweller, Explorer, White Milgauss, DJ41 fluted and mint green. Oyster Perpetual 41 green dial, Oyster Perpetual 39 grape dial, Tudor BB Harrods edition.

22 July 2019, 04:47 AM	#52
daOnlyBG "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2017 Location: Odorious Onion Watch: yes, it's hipster Posts: 1,568	I really dig the crystal. __________________ Here come dat boi Jerry

1 July 2019, 02:36 AM	#31
vipereaper30 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2015 Real Name: BMF Location: California USA Watch: FPJ UTC Posts: 2,245	It doesn't wear thick to me and I've been lucky with no date issue during a year of ownership. It's probably the best GMT for the money. Other than style I often find myself struggling to justify the current Rolex when it comes down to the which to wear decision.

1 July 2019, 03:38 AM	#33
fullofboats "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2019 Location: Hong Kong Posts: 528	That BC strap looks amazing Dan. Could I bother you to share the model # or where you got it from? The BC website isn't the most consumer friendly and doesn't seem to have any shopping options or retailer details

1 July 2019, 01:28 PM	#36
grimlock525 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: West Coast Posts: 88	So just how widespread is this date issue that people have mentioned? I did some googling and it seems like it mostly affects early production models? If I get mine in 3-4 months as estimated by the AD, will it most likely have the fixed movement that people claim was implemented to address the issue?

1 July 2019, 02:59 PM	#37
Freelance "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: USA Watch: 1675 Posts: 171	I have smallish wrists 6.8", and the BB's fit me fine. The nice thing is the lug-to-lug is reasonable, so other than height/thickness, it wears well. The clasp could be more comfortable on their bracelet (wish it had a Pelagos clasp) but it's minor.

2 July 2019, 01:37 AM	#39
sagla "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2019 Location: U.S. Posts: 139	It is a great watch. Built like a real tool watch. Wear it on every occasion. I love it. Very good looking one. Imho, buy it without any hesitation!

2 July 2019, 07:32 PM	#43
FloridaSam "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: Sam Location: Sunny Florida Watch: Rolex 16013 Posts: 291	On The Tudor site the difference between the Nato and the Bracelet model is $325.00. I'm guessing $350-475?

2 July 2019, 08:25 PM	#44
sekpaul "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2019 Location: sydney Posts: 108	I bought a bracelet. Think it was about AUD$600. F740505D-00C1-40AD-986E-508C4F0D7AD0.jpg Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

2 July 2019, 08:26 PM	#45
sekpaul "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2019 Location: sydney Posts: 108	Leather is a lot lighter too Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

2 July 2019, 08:43 PM	#46
MindMatter "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2019 Location: USA Posts: 8	I'm going to wait until the movement issues and production has ramped up, but then yes I'll be getting one.

22 July 2019, 12:53 AM	#49
Jona Banned Join Date: May 2019 Location: USA Watch: 116618LN Posts: 1,399	I lucked out at the AD last week as one had just arrived and the guy at the top of the list declined it. I ordered the Tudor leather strap and deployant which should arrive in about 2 weeks. I am very pleased with the watch. No date change issue, and I like the no PCL look. Price less than half of the Rolex GMT which is a lot tougher to find at MSRP.

22 July 2019, 04:42 AM	#51
Wristwatchin "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2019 Location: LA Watch: Rolexxx Posts: 86	I love mine. Prefect for dress or causal use. Mine is on a steel bracelet, it’s a bit thicker and heavier than my explorer ii(ref:216570) but overall build quality is superb. Best watch for 4K IMO.

22 July 2019, 04:59 AM	#54
Ssunnylee24 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2017 Location: Los Angeles Watch: Explorer II Posts: 853	Unfortunately, I had to sell mine but it was a hell of a watch.

22 July 2019, 10:16 PM	#59
konkaniman "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2016 Location: USA Posts: 67	Is lack of quick set date bothersome? Not sure I've had a watch without quick set date.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)