|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
19 January 2017, 12:13 PM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Darien, CT
Posts: 321
|
GMT Dial for review..
Think this is some variation of a MKV but, it isnt a 5, 5a or 5c.
So, what do I have here? |
|
|
|
19 January 2017, 11:41 PM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Real Name: Tom
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,172
|
Looks like a mark VI but I would wait for confirmation from the experts.
|
|
|
|
|
19 January 2017, 11:52 PM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Darien, CT
Posts: 321
|
Really? I dont think I have ever seen one. I was always under the impression that mark 5's went all the way up to 5.99m and the 1675's ended at that point so, I am wondering where a MK6 would fall in line with production. Maybe overlapping?
Thank You Tom for responding. Looks like this one isnt so easy... |
|
|
|
|
20 January 2017, 12:03 AM
|
#4 |
|
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,589
|
Can you post a picture of the back of the dial?
|
|
|
|
|
20 January 2017, 12:08 AM
|
#5 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Darien, CT
Posts: 321
|
I can do so shortly, but I can tell you it has no Beyeler markings and is smooth. I will get you a photo shortly.
Thank you TTG |
|
|
|
|
20 January 2017, 12:12 AM
|
#6 |
|
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,589
|
Just want to make sure, it is indeed a 1675 dial or is not.. since you everyone is pointing to Mk-V variation...
|
|
|
|
|
20 January 2017, 12:19 AM
|
#7 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Darien, CT
Posts: 321
|
Interesting.. I didnt check the feet position. There is A "B" indicating a Beyeler dial so, maybe this may help..
|
|
|
|
|
20 January 2017, 12:21 AM
|
#8 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Darien, CT
Posts: 321
|
Feet position appear correct when compared to my other 1675 dials..
|
|
|
|
|
20 January 2017, 12:21 AM
|
#9 |
|
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,589
|
Yes, 1675 Mk-6.
Dial is latest variation which if you had a 16750 dial, would look very similar, so you would have to verify with the feet position. See here: https://rolexvintageforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=195 |
|
|
|
|
20 January 2017, 12:26 AM
|
#10 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Justin
Location: Jupiter, FL
Watch: 1530,1665,1680
Posts: 2,054
|
Doesn't the B on the back of the dial mean it's a Beyeler dial?
|
|
|
|
20 January 2017, 12:28 AM
|
#11 | |
|
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,589
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 January 2017, 12:39 AM
|
#12 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Darien, CT
Posts: 321
|
Thank you. I do have a few questions...
For a dial that is claimed to be most prevalent, I have never seen one before. Lots of MK5 variations, but never a MK6. Second question.. Did all of the MK5's and now the MK6's get installed on watches in the 5 million range? There doesnt seem to be a range for 5, or 5a or 5c or 6..it seems they can be found all over the place from early 5m to very late 5m. Is that the case? Thanks TTG |
|
|
|
|
20 January 2017, 12:55 AM
|
#13 |
|
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,589
|
Since it is one of the last versions of the model, you will see it across the entire production years of the model because it was/can be used as a replacement/service dial on earlier watches.
I would say from the mid to the high 5 mil series is acceptable but remember with Rolex anything is possible.. At the end of the day, it is a tritium matte dial, not like the later luminova type service dials, thus more desirable.. |
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
