ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rockrolex · 12 September 2013, 07:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dream99

Who are you calling names that's a sign you have no class and why you probably wear Rolex.

He failed to heed my warning. So he's now off to dreamland permanently.

FeelingTheBlues · 12 September 2013, 07:18 AM

EDIT: My post is not necessary anymore since it seems like Ed solved our problem, thank you my friend.

Welshwatchman · 12 September 2013, 07:28 AM

Another one who can't help but ....

Tools · 12 September 2013, 08:44 AM

Clearly his "big watch" fixation is to compensate for other serious short-comings...

Presa canary · 12 September 2013, 08:51 AM

I don't even get what he was talking about... Nor why he had so many posts on a rolex forum, when he didn't care for them. Sayonara tool

KBM · 12 September 2013, 09:25 AM

As inappropriate as that guy's comments were, I cannot justify the kind of response Rockrolex presented. Especially being a mod, you can't let them drag you down to their level.

Lisa · 12 September 2013, 10:39 AM

Thank you, mods!

Jack T · 12 September 2013, 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wantonebad

The answer to the "PO or Sub" question is clear, the answer is YES!

Unique watches with great manufacturers and pedigrees, they aren't the same watch so it's totally acceptable to own both, as many here do...

Well said. I love them both!

DennisJ · 23 September 2013, 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SearChart

The PO is good looking but it's definitely not the new sub.
It's heavier, it's thicker, resale value isn't as good as the sub and it's not as iconic.

You are quite right. Sorry for my earlier statement.
Today I parted with a not inconsiderable pile of cash. But boy was it worth it!.
I found a lovely vintage 16800 from 1985, recently overhauled but only the movement. The dial is still original and has a great patine.

Sorry for low quality iphone picture....

improviz · 24 September 2013, 02:54 AM

Beautiful, congratulations!

DennisJ · 25 September 2013, 12:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack T

Well said. I love them both!

Me to

How · 30 September 2013, 01:50 AM

I own both the PO and the Sub.

I love both, but for different reasons.

Both are beautiful pieces in their own right.

But the PO, will never EVER, be the Sub.

Nor will it replace the Sub or take the place of the Sub.

rjarr · 30 September 2013, 02:40 AM

PO is a nice watch but will never be a sub....

12 September 2013, 07:18 AM	#122
FeelingTheBlues "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Real Name: Carl Location: Always moving Watch: If you wish... Posts: 22,039	EDIT: My post is not necessary anymore since it seems like Ed solved our problem, thank you my friend. __________________ Mon corps c'est un pays en guerre sur l'point d'finir, Le général de l'armée de terre s'attend au pire, J'ai faim, j'ai frette, je suis trop faible pour me lever debout, On va hisser le drapeau blanc un point c'est tout. - André Fortin

12 September 2013, 08:44 AM	#124
Tools TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron Join Date: May 2007 Real Name: Larry Location: Mojave Desert Watch: GMT's Posts: 43,049	Clearly his "big watch" fixation is to compensate for other serious short-comings... __________________ (Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member

24 September 2013, 02:54 AM	#130
improviz "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Tejas Watch: your step Posts: 2,806	Beautiful, congratulations! __________________ 116520 white; 16613 black; 116710; 16570 polar; 16600. AP 15400; 15703. Blancpain Fifty Fathoms. Glashutte Sport Evo GMT. Omega Planet Ocean 2907.50.91; Planet Ocean Liquidmetal LE 222.30.42.20.01.001; Seamaster 2255.80.00. Breitling Crosswind, white. Panerai PAM 005. VC Overseas Chrono, black.

12 September 2013, 07:28 AM	#123
Welshwatchman "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Real Name: Paul Location: Wales, UK Posts: 14,578	Another one who can't help but ....

12 September 2013, 08:51 AM	#125
Presa canary "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Real Name: Justin Location: Pa Watch: Explorer ii Posts: 3,150	I don't even get what he was talking about... Nor why he had so many posts on a rolex forum, when he didn't care for them. Sayonara tool

12 September 2013, 09:25 AM	#126
KBM 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: K. Location: 780 Posts: 10,389	As inappropriate as that guy's comments were, I cannot justify the kind of response Rockrolex presented. Especially being a mod, you can't let them drag you down to their level.

12 September 2013, 10:39 AM	#127
Lisa "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: oklahoma city Posts: 15,741	Thank you, mods!

30 September 2013, 01:50 AM	#132
How "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: Melbourne Watch: 16610, Tudor 1960 Posts: 1,554	I own both the PO and the Sub. I love both, but for different reasons. Both are beautiful pieces in their own right. But the PO, will never EVER, be the Sub. Nor will it replace the Sub or take the place of the Sub.

30 September 2013, 02:40 AM	#133
rjarr "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Real Name: Richie Location: new york Watch: AP,Rolex Posts: 114	PO is a nice watch but will never be a sub....

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)