The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Grand Seiko & Seiko Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16 March 2007, 07:08 AM   #1
nko51
"TRF" Member
 
nko51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Alex
Location: USA
Watch: TT Blue Sub
Posts: 2,542
Macro Practice Pic's of Seiko Quartz Dive Watch

Pic's for your reviewing pleasure! Critque's are all welcome! These were taken in 640X480 mode.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_0008.JPG (111.7 KB, 43 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_0013.JPG (91.2 KB, 43 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_0009.JPG (89.9 KB, 43 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_0007.JPG (100.7 KB, 43 views)
__________________
nko51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2007, 07:12 AM   #2
Solo118
"TRF" Member
 
Solo118's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 6,063
Pics look good, You just need to avoid the glare on the glass of the watch. Its hard to get away from glare without losing light, So if you do lots of photography you might want to invest in a light box. As for me I attempted making my own by getting a regular cardboard box and stapling white paper inside of it... Didnt work too well
Solo118 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2007, 07:12 AM   #3
mrbieler
"TRF" Member
 
mrbieler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Lost Angeles
Watch: all about acrylic
Posts: 683
Nice. My wife is waiting for a new lenses for her camera. I hope to be able to try macro's and lume shots soon.

Agree on the light box. The have nice sets for sale all over. Designed for eBay type photos, they are designed for small items.

Now take that watch and drop it into a 6309 case. Everything carries over. It's an awesome conversion that's easy to do.

The 6309 cushion case is classic and very comfortable.
__________________
- Jeff

Cursimus Cum Forfex

mrbieler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2007, 07:30 AM   #4
SLRdude
"TRF" Member
 
SLRdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Chip
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 6,194
Try placing your camera on a stable surface and shoot using the timer.
Also, you might want to try full resolution, and perhaps crop. That would get you even closer.

Here are some examples that I took.







Or even closer...





However, you are off to a good start. Keep practicing and you will be amazed. You are on the right track.
__________________
Try not. Do... or do not. There is no try.
Yoda, Jedi Master
CHIP
Member # 87
SLRdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2007, 07:32 AM   #5
Prince
"TRF" Member
 
Prince's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Real Name: Allan
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Watch: Daytona/Sub/GMT/DJ
Posts: 20,323
OMG, Chip. Those are the most amazing macros of the Black Monster I have ever seen!!! Simply superb!!!
__________________
Member: Rolex Keeper's Society
"You see, you can't please everyone, so you got to please yourself." - Rick Nelson
Prince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2007, 07:47 AM   #6
nko51
"TRF" Member
 
nko51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Alex
Location: USA
Watch: TT Blue Sub
Posts: 2,542
Quote:
Originally Posted by comatox View Post
Try placing your camera on a stable surface and shoot using the timer.
Also, you might want to try full resolution, and perhaps crop. That would get you even closer.

Here are some examples that I took.







Or even closer...





However, you are off to a good start. Keep practicing and you will be amazed. You are on the right track.

Your Pic's are the most amazing closeups I have ever seen! I am baffled at how close you were able to get. The camera I am using is only a Canon SD700 IS.
__________________
nko51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2007, 07:51 AM   #7
SLRdude
"TRF" Member
 
SLRdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Chip
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 6,194
Thanks!

Here is another trick:

Your Canon probably shoots at 72dpi (dots per inch) resolution. What you COULD do is open that image in a photo editor and increase the dpi to like 100 or something. That would increase the physical size of your image, without any serious damage to the quality.

I haven't used that in a while, now I rely 100% on optics to achieve the results I get.
__________________
Try not. Do... or do not. There is no try.
Yoda, Jedi Master
CHIP
Member # 87
SLRdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2007, 08:00 AM   #8
SLRdude
"TRF" Member
 
SLRdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Chip
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 6,194
Here is an example using your photo and the method above. Turns out your cam shoots at 180 dpi, and I have increased it to 380 for this example.
Keep in mind that increasing the dpi is NOT the same as increasing your image size by giving it more pixels. (such as going to 1024/768 from 640/480)

Original



After increasing the dpi and cropping



Imagine what you could do if you would have taken the shot at full resolution instead of 640/480!!!

I always told people... Camera, for the most part, does NOT matter. It what you show the camera that counts, and what you do with the image after. The cheapest throw away camera you can buy today is way better than what Ansel Adams had to work with.
__________________
Try not. Do... or do not. There is no try.
Yoda, Jedi Master
CHIP
Member # 87
SLRdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2007, 08:48 AM   #9
davor
"TRF" Member
 
davor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: davor
Location: croatia
Posts: 669
comatox TEACH me o great one...
those are the best i have seen in a long long long time...
davor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2007, 09:47 AM   #10
SLRdude
"TRF" Member
 
SLRdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Chip
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 6,194
Quote:
Originally Posted by davor View Post
comatox TEACH me o great one...
those are the best i have seen in a long long long time...
Well thanks!
I'm a self thought amateur that learned through experimenting.
If there are questions, I always try to help. I'm not that good though... I just show you the pics worth seeing. For every good one I take a ton of horrible ones!
__________________
Try not. Do... or do not. There is no try.
Yoda, Jedi Master
CHIP
Member # 87
SLRdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2007, 12:42 PM   #11
nko51
"TRF" Member
 
nko51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Alex
Location: USA
Watch: TT Blue Sub
Posts: 2,542
Quote:
Originally Posted by comatox View Post
Here is an example using your photo and the method above. Turns out your cam shoots at 180 dpi, and I have increased it to 380 for this example.
Keep in mind that increasing the dpi is NOT the same as increasing your image size by giving it more pixels. (such as going to 1024/768 from 640/480)

Original



After increasing the dpi and cropping



Imagine what you could do if you would have taken the shot at full resolution instead of 640/480!!!

I always told people... Camera, for the most part, does NOT matter. It what you show the camera that counts, and what you do with the image after. The cheapest throw away camera you can buy today is way better than what Ansel Adams had to work with.
Thank you very much for all the fantastic information. I will be trying those suggestions as soon as I get home from work tomorrow.
__________________
nko51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.