ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

takumee · 21 December 2015, 07:07 PM

Hi all,

I have seen a few 1803 with a non cyclops crystal install which looks very neat.

I understand our crystal being 30.3mm and I have bought a few models at ofrei.

However, when I brought to my watche smith I was told not able to fit in due to the pie pan design.

Can anyone point me the right direction when can I get one with no cyclops and ultra high dome effect?

Thanks many

padi56 · 21 December 2015, 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by takumee

Hi all,

I have seen a few 1803 with a non cyclops crystal install which looks very neat.

I understand our crystal being 30.3mm and I have bought a few models at ofrei.

However, when I brought to my watche smith I was told not able to fit in due to the pie pan design.

Can anyone point me the right direction when can I get one with no cyclops and ultra high dome effect?

Thanks many

If your watch has a pie-pan dial I would have thought crystal would be acrylic now acrylic crystals are a totally different fit than sapphire.So I would advise you to stick to the original acrylic if thats original to your watch.

seattleal · 22 December 2015, 03:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by takumee

Hi all,

I have seen a few 1803 with a non cyclops crystal install which looks very neat.

I understand our crystal being 30.3mm and I have bought a few models at ofrei.

However, when I brought to my watche smith I was told not able to fit in due to the pie pan design.

Can anyone point me the right direction when can I get one with no cyclops and ultra high dome effect?

Thanks many

I use Sternkreuz T-21

Look here - http://www.ofrei.com/page419.html

seattleal · 22 December 2015, 03:45 AM

Here is a pic-

nsumner · 22 December 2015, 03:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seattleal

I use Sternkreuz T-21

Look here - http://www.ofrei.com/page419.html

Yes, a T21 from a 4 digit Daytona works perfectly.

takumee · 22 December 2015, 08:43 AM

Thanks all!!!

: )

takumee · 22 December 2015, 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seattleal

Here is a pic-

Hi,

You mean this: SK-XS 306.449. ?

takumee · 22 December 2015, 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seattleal

Here is a pic-

Hi,

You mean this: SK-XS 306.449. ?

seattleal · 22 December 2015, 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by takumee

Hi,

You mean this: SK-XS 306.449. ?

Yes

takumee · 22 December 2015, 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seattleal

Yes

Appreciated

southtexas · 22 December 2015, 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seattleal

Here is a pic-

Very cool Al, can we can get a head-on shot?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

seattleal · 23 December 2015, 02:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by southtexas

Very cool Al, can we can get a head-on shot?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sure-

southtexas · 23 December 2015, 06:12 AM

And wide boy! Very very cool

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

datejust24 · 23 December 2015, 06:19 AM

That's a gorgeous piece ...I would heed Peters advice and leave it alone or source a correct crystal otherwise you are compromising the water tightness amongst other potential issues ...just my honest opinion ....no sense in potentially ruining a perfectly fine watch

takumee · 23 December 2015, 07:42 AM

Just so Neat without the cyclops.

Now is can find one slight high dome one would be better..

It's just me..

Haha

Brisman · 23 December 2015, 06:27 PM

This belongs to a friend of mine.

Willygallardo · 24 December 2015, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brisman

This belongs to a friend of mine.

what a beauty

watchyou · 27 December 2015, 09:57 AM

Here's my Pink gold without the cyclop.

Yellow gold without the cyclop.

The moose · 27 December 2015, 05:32 PM

Wow, guys! Cool look without the cyclop. Does anyone know if the crystal model you are referring to would also fit the 1601 case?

takumee · 10 January 2016, 12:13 AM

I just bought a Clarks t21, would that fit?

takumee · 10 January 2016, 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The moose

Wow, guys! Cool look without the cyclop. Does anyone know if the crystal model you are referring to would also fit the 1601 case?

I Guess is the same since both are pan pie dials..

dysondiver · 10 January 2016, 12:21 AM

great look . hope if its a daytona crystal , its water tight , id have it checked just for peice of mind though

takumee · 22 January 2016, 05:41 PM

Finally my crystal arrived..

takumee · 22 January 2016, 06:39 PM

Vs

This

seattleal · 23 January 2016, 03:03 AM

Wow! Really makes a difference, doesn't it!
Glad I could help, that is a beauty.

southtexas · 23 January 2016, 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by takumee

Finally my crystal arrived..

Looks amazing, great job

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

takumee · 25 January 2016, 12:52 AM

Thanks..

FYI, I'm using Clarks t21..needs some greesing to bring down the bezel.

Ofrei crystal should fit better..

dysondiver · 25 January 2016, 01:05 AM

great look , loving the wide boy

77T · 25 January 2016, 02:58 AM

I like the look - but like Peter said be sure it's airtight with fit and do a pressure test.
My poor old eyes need the cyclops though

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

mineral · 29 January 2016, 11:33 AM

I like the cleaner dial look without the cyclop. Look perfect!

21 December 2015, 07:07 PM	#1
takumee "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Singapore Posts: 142	Rolex 1803 non cyclops crystal Hi all, I have seen a few 1803 with a non cyclops crystal install which looks very neat. I understand our crystal being 30.3mm and I have bought a few models at ofrei. However, when I brought to my watche smith I was told not able to fit in due to the pie pan design. Can anyone point me the right direction when can I get one with no cyclops and ultra high dome effect? Thanks many

23 December 2015, 06:12 AM	#13
southtexas 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2011 Location: Great State of TX Posts: 5,684	And wide boy! Very very cool Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ Forty six & 2 are just ahead of me. Follow me on Instagram @ccrolex

25 January 2016, 02:58 AM	#29
77T 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: PaulG Location: Georgia Posts: 40,725	I like the look - but like Peter said be sure it's airtight with fit and do a pressure test. My poor old eyes need the cyclops though Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ Does anyone really know what time it is?

22 December 2015, 08:43 AM	#6
takumee "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Singapore Posts: 142	Thanks all!!! : )

23 December 2015, 06:19 AM	#14
datejust24 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Chris Location: Cincinnati,Ohio Watch: Rolexssss Posts: 3,504	That's a gorgeous piece ...I would heed Peters advice and leave it alone or source a correct crystal otherwise you are compromising the water tightness amongst other potential issues ...just my honest opinion ....no sense in potentially ruining a perfectly fine watch

23 December 2015, 07:42 AM	#15
takumee "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Singapore Posts: 142	Just so Neat without the cyclops. Now is can find one slight high dome one would be better.. It's just me.. Haha

23 December 2015, 06:27 PM	#16
Brisman "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Real Name: Donald Location: Australia Posts: 973	This belongs to a friend of mine.

27 December 2015, 09:57 AM	#18
watchyou "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Canada Posts: 909	Here's my Pink gold without the cyclop. Yellow gold without the cyclop.

27 December 2015, 05:32 PM	#19
The moose Banned Join Date: Aug 2013 Location: USA Posts: 968	Wow, guys! Cool look without the cyclop. Does anyone know if the crystal model you are referring to would also fit the 1601 case?

10 January 2016, 12:13 AM	#20
takumee "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Singapore Posts: 142	I just bought a Clarks t21, would that fit?

10 January 2016, 12:21 AM	#22
dysondiver "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: tom Location: northern ireland Watch: my fins Posts: 10,063	great look . hope if its a daytona crystal , its water tight , id have it checked just for peice of mind though

22 January 2016, 05:41 PM	#23
takumee "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Singapore Posts: 142	Finally my crystal arrived..

22 January 2016, 06:39 PM	#24
takumee "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Singapore Posts: 142	Vs This

23 January 2016, 03:03 AM	#25
seattleal 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Real Name: Al Location: Out West Watch: Gilt Subs Posts: 837	Wow! Really makes a difference, doesn't it! Glad I could help, that is a beauty.

25 January 2016, 12:52 AM	#27
takumee "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Singapore Posts: 142	Thanks.. FYI, I'm using Clarks t21..needs some greesing to bring down the bezel. Ofrei crystal should fit better..

25 January 2016, 01:05 AM	#28
dysondiver "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: tom Location: northern ireland Watch: my fins Posts: 10,063	great look , loving the wide boy

29 January 2016, 11:33 AM	#30
mineral "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 3,670	I like the cleaner dial look without the cyclop. Look perfect!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)