The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Panerai Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 30 April 2017, 04:39 AM   #1
Paul_I
"TRF" Member
 
Paul_I's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 1,448
Opinions on the PAM 320 - Luminor 1950 3 Days GMT

Considering one of these as my next watch. Does anyone have one? Strong opinions either way?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Panerai-Luminor-1950-3-Days-GMT-PAM-320-6.jpg (131.3 KB, 235 views)
File Type: jpg Panerai-Luminor-1950-3-Days-GMT-PAM-320-1.jpg (123.7 KB, 234 views)
__________________

Paul_I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 April 2017, 04:42 AM   #2
Psmith
"TRF" Member
 
Psmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
I love it - one of my fave PAMs. Simple implementation of the second time zone, and the second hour hand can be hidden behind the main hour hand when not in use. Power reserve indicator on the back of the movement is useful. More functional than the 312 but not as expensive as the 233.
__________________
Psmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 April 2017, 04:44 AM   #3
Paul_I
"TRF" Member
 
Paul_I's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 1,448
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psmith View Post
I love it - one of my fave PAMs. Simple implementation of the second time zone, and the second hour hand can be hidden behind the main hour hand when not in use. Power reserve indicator on the back of the movement is useful. More functional than the 312 but not as expensive as the 233.
Thank you. I think this will be the one. :)
__________________

Paul_I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 April 2017, 05:20 AM   #4
Rushne
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Rushne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Watch: White 116500LN
Posts: 862
It's an fantastic watch! If I didn't have my 297 already I would have got the 320. Actually regret not knowing about the 320 before getting the 297 :)
Rushne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 April 2017, 06:15 AM   #5
JD521
"TRF" Member
 
JD521's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: John
Location: The Bay
Posts: 1,055
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psmith View Post
I love it - one of my fave PAMs. Simple implementation of the second time zone, and the second hour hand can be hidden behind the main hour hand when not in use. Power reserve indicator on the back of the movement is useful. More functional than the 312 but not as expensive as the 233.


Exactly


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
JD521 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 April 2017, 07:04 AM   #6
Cru Jones
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34,495
Great watch if it sits nicely on your wrist (auto 1950 Luminors can be a tad thick & top heavy for some wrists).
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 April 2017, 07:11 AM   #7
Benjamin Choi
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 237
Non-domed, skinny hands, pass. Shouldn't even be in the same sentence as the 233 imho.
Benjamin Choi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 April 2017, 01:11 PM   #8
nick c
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
Quote:
Originally Posted by cru jones View Post
great watch if it sits nicely on your wrist (auto 1950 luminors can be a tad thick & top heavy for some wrists).
x2
nick c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 May 2017, 02:51 PM   #9
blueddy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Edwin
Location: Bellevue WA
Watch: Panerai 441
Posts: 20
320 is a lot cheaper than 233. If money is no object, of course 233.
blueddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 May 2017, 11:24 PM   #10
capacitance
"TRF" Member
 
capacitance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: US
Watch: SD4k, BLNR, PAM233
Posts: 76
The 320 hits a lot of features that PAM has to offer in terms of complications and design. Automatic "In house designed" movement, sandwich dial, 2nd time zone, power-reserve indicator, and an easier push button spring bar release (which I feel is easier to change straps rather than the tiny screws). All available in on package.
I owned the 359 which wore about the same and will say you might have to get accustom to the size and balance of the watch. Loved the watch but sold it for funds toward my personal favorite the 233.
Either way congrats!
capacitance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 May 2017, 11:51 PM   #11
MrLy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: David
Location: Washington DC
Watch: PAM 360
Posts: 103
Love this watch! Looks massive in pictures but it sit really well on my 6.5 wrist

Here are some pics for your enjoyment.





[IMG][/IMG]



MrLy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2017, 01:45 PM   #12
Ruud Van Driver
"TRF" Member
 
Ruud Van Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chopped Liver
Location: S. Wales Valleys
Watch: Mickey Mouse
Posts: 9,924
It's a 1950 Luminor so I like it by default. However, I'm not so keen on the GMT versions that don't have an indicator to show whether the second time zone is AM or PM. Still a smart looking piece though
__________________
116520 Black, 116610 LVc, 116660 D-Blue, 116610 LNc, 116622 Blue, PAM359, PAM689, PAM737

"Why should you allow an AD to shake you down, just so you can buy a watch" - Grady Philpott
Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
Ruud Van Driver is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.