The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11 July 2017, 11:07 PM   #1
centrelink
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Australia
Posts: 18
Is this 15400 too big for me?

I'm a huge fan of the 15202 but unfortunately I suffer from 6.3" wrists (16cm) :( however I wasn't going to let that stop me from trying it on at least. So off I went to the AD but was disappointed to hear that they didn't carry the jumbo. They did have a 15400 and I thought I'd just humour myself and I tried it on.

Much to my surprise, the lugs and extended/integrated links did not hang over at all and it fit snugly around my wrist. The bracelet was too long but that was completely expected; I just pinched it back with my other hand.

Anyway here are the pics. I was looking for your opinions on whether it looks too big for me overall. I'd appreciate any input and especially your candour. Thanks!

I look forward to trying on a 15202 some point in the near future, which I suspect should suit my size a little better.
















Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
centrelink is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 July 2017, 11:17 PM   #2
HK Islandboy
"TRF" Member
 
HK Islandboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: AP
Posts: 3,825
I think it looks great. Not too large
HK Islandboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 July 2017, 11:21 PM   #3
GB-man
2024 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 36,864
You can certainly pull it off. I'd still check out the 15202 if possible to be sure.
__________________
GB-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 July 2017, 11:29 PM   #4
sechsgang
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,443
I actually think that looks great on you. Size enough to be modern but not overbearing.
sechsgang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 July 2017, 11:40 PM   #5
tng11
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: N/A
Posts: 3,629
That 15400 fits better on your wrist than mine, and it looks like a great size for you. Mine was 6.3", and the 26320 (same 41mm case) looked like this on my wrist:

(clearly pushing the limits of what I can wear)



Since then, my wrist has grown to 6.5" and the 15202 is the perfect size for me:



I still say, try to track down a 15202 before deciding on the 15400.
tng11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 July 2017, 11:44 PM   #6
WWCO
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Jack
Location: UK
Watch: Not enough
Posts: 184
Perfect mate!
WWCO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 July 2017, 11:54 PM   #7
centrelink
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Australia
Posts: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by tng11 View Post
That 15400 fits better on your wrist than mine, and it looks like a great size for you. Mine was 6.3", and the 25860 (same 41mm case) looked like this on my wrist:

(clearly pushing the limits of what I can wear)



Since then, my wrist has grown to 6.5" and the 15202 is the perfect size for me:


I still say, try to track down a 15202 before deciding on the 15400.

Thanks! And I agree the 15202 looks great on you, can I ask how your wrist size changed that much? Gym?

I'll definitely try and track down a jumbo if I can :)


Quote:
Originally Posted by WWCO View Post
Perfect mate!

Quote:
Originally Posted by sechsgang View Post
I actually think that looks great on you. Size enough to be modern but not overbearing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
You can certainly pull it off. I'd still check out the 15202 if possible to be sure.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HK Islandboy View Post
I think it looks great. Not too large

Thanks guys, I appreciate the feed back :)





Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
centrelink is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 July 2017, 12:30 AM   #8
tng11
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: N/A
Posts: 3,629
Quote:
Originally Posted by centrelink View Post
Thanks! And I agree the 15202 looks great on you, can I ask how your wrist size changed that much? Gym?
12 months of boxing and weightlifting.
tng11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 July 2017, 12:33 AM   #9
centrelink
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Australia
Posts: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by tng11 View Post
12 months of boxing and weightlifting.


Good to know there are things you can do to change wrist size haha


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
centrelink is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 July 2017, 12:42 AM   #10
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,232
Looks perfect! Mirror/friend shots are the best.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 July 2017, 01:03 AM   #11
Rachdanon
"TRF" Member
 
Rachdanon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Singapore
Posts: 266
15400 by definition is a sports watch. It looks great on you. But if you want it to be dressier Id say try the 15202 or 15450.
Rachdanon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 July 2017, 01:05 AM   #12
2nastie
"TRF" Member
 
2nastie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: YVR
Watch: Time Only
Posts: 2,332
Beautiful! I think it fits well imo. I have the exact same wrist size as you 6.3" and I went with a white dial 15400.

The fit of a watch depends completely on the "construction" of your wrist. Based on the picture, like me, you probably have a flat wrist and therefore the bulk of the watch will sit right on top. Haha... we are probably more bony in that area of our body. Most individuals will have a rounder wrist (symentrical) and therefore it "pushes" the watch upwards while reducing the wrist to wrist surface area making the watch look oversized. I also want to say it probably makes a difference with the size of an individuals hand and the appearance of a watch on the wrist. It balances the appearance of bulk on a wrist.

Eitherway I think it works for sure. 15202 is always the perfect model. Give that a try first. If you can afford to buy that 15202 right now, better purchase that instead.
2nastie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 July 2017, 01:10 AM   #13
Tmac478
"TRF" Member
 
Tmac478's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: Tony
Location: SF Bay Area
Watch: RG Skydweller
Posts: 1,469
Looks great!
Mine says hi:


Tmac478 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 July 2017, 02:21 AM   #14
ezinhk
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: hk
Posts: 691
Looks awesome! I find 15202 size quite girly :)
ezinhk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 July 2017, 02:36 AM   #15
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
not too big. its also not a questionable fit, in that it is fairly close to being too big. That fits like it should IMO

The pants on the other hand, those might be a tad too short
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 July 2017, 03:22 AM   #16
roger0770
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: On Earth
Watch: A Few
Posts: 1,510
I think it looks fine. Btw, love the Nike Flyknit Racers.
roger0770 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 July 2017, 03:40 AM   #17
Superburrito
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: California
Watch: 26420RO
Posts: 448
15400 looks great on you - but check out the 15202 also.
Superburrito is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 July 2017, 05:01 AM   #18
KBM
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
KBM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: K.
Location: 780
Posts: 10,390
From those pics, the 15400 looks great on you. Not too large at all, but lots of wrist presence.
KBM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 July 2017, 05:23 AM   #19
dddibakar
"TRF" Member
 
dddibakar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Real Name: Dibakar
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 52
Yours seems perfectly fine. How is it that the fit of the 15400 on my 6.3" wrist is on another level. HUGE.
dddibakar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 July 2017, 05:34 AM   #20
tonupbklyn
"TRF" Member
 
tonupbklyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: bklyn
Posts: 1,471
wow that looks surprisingly fine for a 6.3 wrist.
get it!
tonupbklyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 July 2017, 07:01 AM   #21
hugs
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: UK bad teeth etc
Watch: Rolex and Tudor
Posts: 1,001
I think it's just on the edge. If you are sure your wrist will not get smaller (weight / heat when you tried it on) it's fine
hugs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 July 2017, 09:39 AM   #22
red1108nyc
2024 Pledge Member
 
red1108nyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Fred
Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 8,500
You can do it and looks good
red1108nyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 July 2017, 05:56 PM   #23
toi
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: santa barbara
Watch: AP Diver
Posts: 56
I think it is perfect size
toi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 July 2017, 08:24 PM   #24
Hotrod297
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Hotrod297's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Rod
Location: USA & UAE
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 766
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyler1980 View Post
not too big. its also not a questionable fit, in that it is fairly close to being too big. That fits like it should IMO

The pants on the other hand, those might be a tad too short
__________________
"I collect Rolex because I love'um and dig'um"
Hotrod297 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 July 2017, 08:38 PM   #25
1William
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 44,749
Properly sized it will work. Great looking watch.
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 July 2017, 09:56 PM   #26
texex91
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
Looks like it was made for you.
texex91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2017, 06:03 PM   #27
volcano
"TRF" Member
 
volcano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: spain
Posts: 17
Perfect fit.
The bigger the better.
If you have a choice, go for the 15202.
Regards,
Hans
volcano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 July 2017, 02:39 AM   #28
Onx
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Southeast Asia
Posts: 160
Looks surprisingly great!
Onx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 July 2017, 06:30 PM   #29
sirish19
"TRF" Member
 
sirish19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: Stephen
Location: Tokyo
Watch: PP-VC-AP
Posts: 1,003
looks good. Go for it.
__________________
sirish19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 July 2017, 09:36 PM   #30
nick c
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
Looks good!
nick c is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.