ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
6 September 2018, 01:46 PM | #31 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Steve
Location: Canada
Watch: 16753; Bellini Dia
Posts: 1,770
|
Quote:
I’ve been tempted by the ExpII several times. I’m surprised I’ve never bought one. If it’s good enough for HRH, then who am I to object! If I were to go with one, polar would be my choice too. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it. SS Submariner no date 1992 (sold); SS GMT II 2007 (sold); SS GMT II C 2008 ('M' series) (sold); SS Sub C 2011 (sold); BB GMT 1971 (sold); Omega 50th GMT |
|
6 September 2018, 11:42 PM | #32 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: London
Posts: 4,452
|
Quote:
The BB GMT is a piece that most people would never notice and feels vintage and contemporary at the same time. This part I really like. If I am choosing between the two in the morning before work, I tend to lean toward the Rolex GMT. I still like the understated black dial and bezel more for daily wear. The evidence is that my Rolex GMT has a lot more scratches than my BB GMT. For reference, I did also own a BLNR GMT and sold that because I liked the LN much more. I hope that helps, but really it felt like I was just rambling!
__________________
@watchtheleftwrist |
|
7 September 2018, 12:25 AM | #33 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Steve
Location: Canada
Watch: 16753; Bellini Dia
Posts: 1,770
|
It all helps! I woke up this morning very aware of the BBGMT and had to shove the watch down my wrist to loosen it up, but last night I snapped a shot of it in low-height sunlight. For me it’s becoming a love-hate watch. I liked my 116710 but I preferred my 16753. The 116710 fitted me better, I think, than the BBGMT does — but the latter is prettier! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it. SS Submariner no date 1992 (sold); SS GMT II 2007 (sold); SS GMT II C 2008 ('M' series) (sold); SS Sub C 2011 (sold); BB GMT 1971 (sold); Omega 50th GMT |
7 September 2018, 12:43 AM | #34 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Real Name: Steve
Location: U.K.
Watch: 321, Snoopy 3
Posts: 4,400
|
Quote:
I have it on both, and the strap makes it wear a lot lighter. It’s also really comfortable once it’s broken in a bit and shows the blue of the bezel off a bit in contrast to the brown. I like the Tudor bracelet, but I think this watch looks and wears better on leather and nato. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
7 September 2018, 12:51 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 34,479
|
That is good to hear, and thank you for the info. I'm normally a bracelet guy, but really liking the look of this one on the leather. And if it feels as good as it looks...well that would be a win for me.
|
7 September 2018, 02:34 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: Usa
Watch: All
Posts: 1,411
|
I think the mistake was taking it off the leather. I put the bbgmt on my heritage chrono bracelet....hated it, put it right back on the leather. I think the caseback bevels help a lot with the clunkiness compared to the normal black bays. good review and agree with most of your points when it's on a bracelet. The leather strap is under the radar but it's what this watch belongs on imo. I never would have thought that pre buy.
|
7 September 2018, 02:47 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: LA
Watch: RLX, ALS
Posts: 3,410
|
Excellent, thorough review. Best I've seen on this watch thus far.
|
7 September 2018, 02:53 AM | #38 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Real Name: Steve
Location: U.K.
Watch: 321, Snoopy 3
Posts: 4,400
|
Quote:
I am too on everything else. Don’t get me wrong, there’s nothing wrong with the bracelet at all, just in my eyes it works best and is most comfortable on leather/fabric. Of course that is completely subjective. In reality, it works really well on all three. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
9 September 2018, 03:37 AM | #39 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Steve
Location: Canada
Watch: 16753; Bellini Dia
Posts: 1,770
|
Quote:
I’ll be interested to see how long their leather holds up with regular settings. I moved to a NATO on my Bremont because the regular swims and bathing was starting to kill the leather strap. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it. SS Submariner no date 1992 (sold); SS GMT II 2007 (sold); SS GMT II C 2008 ('M' series) (sold); SS Sub C 2011 (sold); BB GMT 1971 (sold); Omega 50th GMT |
|
9 September 2018, 06:10 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Real Name: Steve
Location: U.K.
Watch: 321, Snoopy 3
Posts: 4,400
|
It seems fairly good quality and pretty thick. In fact, I think it will look better once broken in a bit more. That said, I won’t take it swimming. I’ll use bracelet or nato for that.
|
9 September 2018, 07:38 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: Always!
Posts: 557
|
Very good and detailed review. It’s a nice watch but too thick for my taste.
|
9 September 2018, 08:42 AM | #42 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Steve
Location: Canada
Watch: 16753; Bellini Dia
Posts: 1,770
|
Quote:
Yeah, I think it does well on a NATO. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it. SS Submariner no date 1992 (sold); SS GMT II 2007 (sold); SS GMT II C 2008 ('M' series) (sold); SS Sub C 2011 (sold); BB GMT 1971 (sold); Omega 50th GMT |
|
10 September 2018, 08:24 AM | #43 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 6,976
|
Quote:
I run Terras (the G2s) on my L322 Supercharged. Way better than stock, but the vehicle is so heavy it does make it tough to stop sometimes on packed snow down hills. I'm debating Duractracs or KO2s if i can figure a way without too many mods. In Canada, I'm not sure though with your Winters as you mentioned. Terrain Response almost always gets traction laterally, but stopping in a vehicle that heavy definitely can be a challenge. Great pics in Tahoe. Looking good |
|
10 September 2018, 08:52 AM | #44 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Steve
Location: Canada
Watch: 16753; Bellini Dia
Posts: 1,770
|
Quote:
Thanks! I was impressed with how he performed. Drove 2500 miles and back and returned 19mpg (USg)! We were just a bit cramped in the back for Jyp -- but we didnt do badly toting 4 kayaks, two tents, coolers, clothes, camping gear, and a swamp-cooler for the hound! I have run both KO2s and Duratracs on my LR3 (in my avatar photo). I recently moved to KO2s on the LR3 over the Duratracs because they looked better with the new rims I put on. They performed pretty much the same, though, with a bit more road noise. I can't tell you how well they lasted because I've now sold the LR3 — my Duratracs pulled 75,000miles and had some left on when I sold them. The KO2s are heavier and the ride was noticeably firmer. Up here, where the cold drops to -40c or more, the compound really does have to be a bit softer in order to stay sticky. The TG have a slightly harder compound, I am told, and tend to become less grippy in the cold. I have heard great things about them in warmer climbs, though! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it. SS Submariner no date 1992 (sold); SS GMT II 2007 (sold); SS GMT II C 2008 ('M' series) (sold); SS Sub C 2011 (sold); BB GMT 1971 (sold); Omega 50th GMT |
|
10 September 2018, 11:30 AM | #45 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: BOS
Watch: 16710;14060;214270
Posts: 6,375
|
A well-reasoned and articulate review. Thanks for taking the time to post.
|
10 September 2018, 08:24 PM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Essex, UK.
Posts: 13
|
Great write up
|
10 September 2018, 09:09 PM | #47 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,063
|
I'm looking forward to getting my GMT back from the RSC. I'm surprised how much I miss it. It quickly became one of my favorites.
|
11 September 2018, 02:34 AM | #48 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Steve
Location: Canada
Watch: 16753; Bellini Dia
Posts: 1,770
|
Quote:
I’m assuming date wheel drama? I put my Bremont back on yesterday, and I’m currently not missing the Tudor. I really do love those hands and domed crystal, though! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it. SS Submariner no date 1992 (sold); SS GMT II 2007 (sold); SS GMT II C 2008 ('M' series) (sold); SS Sub C 2011 (sold); BB GMT 1971 (sold); Omega 50th GMT |
|
12 September 2018, 02:35 AM | #49 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 6,976
|
Quote:
|
|
12 September 2018, 06:25 AM | #50 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,405
|
Nice review. Thanks
|
13 September 2018, 04:25 AM | #51 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Steve
Location: Canada
Watch: 16753; Bellini Dia
Posts: 1,770
|
Quote:
Hahaha!! Well, play with the poke and it can certainly go south on economy!! Thanks! I was disappointed to sell her after I swapped the wheels and tyres out, but she broke down on a trip to Tahoe and the g/f lost faith in her. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it. SS Submariner no date 1992 (sold); SS GMT II 2007 (sold); SS GMT II C 2008 ('M' series) (sold); SS Sub C 2011 (sold); BB GMT 1971 (sold); Omega 50th GMT |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.