The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 16 April 2019, 12:11 AM   #1
ColnagoC60
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Singapore
Posts: 76
RO Chrono 41 vs RO Chrono 38 vs RO 15500

Hi all,

I am considering getting my first AP and need some help understanding the references better.

I tried on the 41mm chrono over the weekend and loved it. I like chrono dials and the version I tried was the panda silver and black reference. I also have a Polar Exp 2 and the ROC felt similar and while the overall heft of the watch seems more on the AP, the dial of the Exp2 looked much larger (the inner black minute train on the AP contributing to this too).

I am also keen on the new 38mm ROC but when I tried the 37mm grey 15450, it felt quite small. I imagine the 38mm ROC with the minute train will make the dial look a bit cramped. From web pics it doesnt seem so but photos online always look larger IMO. They also had a 37mm chrono on display and it def looked small.

Lastly, I am also considering the new 41mm in slate grey. I like how classy it looks but do find the dial a bit plain and worry if I will tire of it over time.

So for those experienced on AP, which of these would you recommend as a first AP?

Thanks

PS
The references are as below:

41mm (26331) - Chrono with silver dial and black sub-dials
https://www.audemarspiguet.com/en/wa....OO.1220ST.03/

38mm (26315) - New chrono with silver dial and blue sub-dials
https://www.audemarspiguet.com/en/wa....OO.1256ST.01/

41mm (15500) - New time and date with slate grey dial
https://www.audemarspiguet.com/en/wa....OO.1220ST.02/
ColnagoC60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 April 2019, 12:19 AM   #2
GB-man
2024 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 36,856
If the 15450 seemed too small I would prob forget the 38mm chrono. Between the panda ROC and the 15500 slate I would prefer the 15500. Display case, new movement and its just a new release which makes it more fun for a first royal oak.
__________________
GB-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 April 2019, 12:26 AM   #3
Horolojust
"TRF" Member
 
Horolojust's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Australia
Posts: 259
RO Chrono 41 vs RO Chrono 38 vs RO 15500

Given that the wear of 37mm looked small to you, I’m guessing you’d feel the same with 38mm chrono which also shares the same bracelet as 15450, and is only thicker in case.

Between ROC and slate grey, if your options are silver panda and slate grey 155, I’d recommend slate grey. But if your options are blue ROC and slate 154; I’d go with blue chrono.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Horolojust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 April 2019, 01:14 AM   #4
Soly20
2024 Pledge Member
 
Soly20's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Soly
Location: UK/US
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 3,089
Out of those 3 options, I would recommend the 15500 grey dial but I am not sure if you can secure one.
Soly20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 April 2019, 01:45 AM   #5
Kjp061987
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Texas
Watch: PAM512
Posts: 333
I believe the bracelet on the 38 mm chrono is identical to that if the 15450, so if you felt it wore small, you’d probably feel the same of that chrono. The silver panda chrono is stunning but assume the same of the grey 15500. Go with your gut, but I’d probably stick to one of the 41 mm options.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Kjp061987 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 April 2019, 09:44 AM   #6
hdfb910
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Pete
Location: Texas
Posts: 571
I go with the 15500 as a first and cornerstone. Can be your “old faithful”. I think you can dress up or down easier for the versatility. Add a Chrono for your second AP


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Patek Philippe 5711/1A-010, Patek Philippe 5170G, Patek Philippe 5227R, Audemar Piguet 15400or, Audemar Piguet 15707ce, Audemar Piguet 26331IP, Audemar 15500 Blue dial, Rolex Pepsi 16710, Rolex Sub 116619LB (Smurf) F.P Journe Platinum Chronometre Souverain, Old School Breitling SuperOcean A17360, Jaeger LeCoultre Geophysic Tru Seconds

Instagram: @donpedro_007
hdfb910 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 April 2019, 10:52 AM   #7
subprimero
"TRF" Member
 
subprimero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: John
Location: Texas
Watch: 14060
Posts: 3,431
You might try to locate a 39mm RO chrono ref. 26300.
subprimero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 April 2019, 03:17 PM   #8
inadeje
2024 Pledge Member
 
inadeje's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Miami
Watch: me lose count.
Posts: 5,568
Here’s mine, it seems like you tried this one. Its a marvelous piece


__________________
♛ 116689 ♛ 116500LN Blk ♛ 116500LN Wht ♛ Sky Dweller 326934-003 ♛ 126710BLNR ♛ 126710BLRO - ♛ 126610LV ♛ 16520 ♛ 16523 ♛ 16610 ♛ 5513 Birth Year - ✠ Patek Philippe 5980/1A-001 - AP 26331ST Panda - Panerai Fiddy 127, Bronzo 671, 687, 111, Ω Speedmaster 1957 Broad Arrow, Daniel Roth Endurer Chronosprint, Cartier Santos XL - ✿ Tudor Black Bay 58 Bronze M79012M, Montblanc TimeWalker Chrono 41
inadeje is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 April 2019, 08:39 PM   #9
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,218
Tough one, think 39mm is probably your best size, shame the new one didn't come out.
AK797 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 16 April 2019, 11:53 PM   #10
ColnagoC60
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Singapore
Posts: 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by inadeje View Post
Here’s mine, it seems like you tried this one. Its a marvelous piece


Yup that’s the one. I also tried the black dial and saw the blue dial in the metal (couldn’t try it as it was spoken for already) and just felt the silver was the most stunning, followed by the blue.

The boutique said all their ROC 38s are taken up already for 2019, but if I want the silver or grey ones, Feb 2020 is almost sure. I’m in no rush so maybe when the 38s come in in Q4 19 then I have a look at it first. They said the 41ROC is not a challenge to get in 1-2 months so long as it not too close to year end. Same for the 155. In fact they said if I want one by Q4 19, they can still get me a slate or black. I am tempted by the notion of going for the “classic” look first as a first foray into the brand, but I feel I would go for it more due to it being true to the model’s historical roots (which for me is not bad rationale) than the look per se. don’t get me wrong, looks great, but the chrono just edges it a bit I feel. Maybe if it were the blue dial I would feel differently.

One thing I have to say is so refreshing with AP is that there’s no games or crazy lists. Tell them what you want and they’re transparent with what and when.

Thanks for the input everyone
ColnagoC60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 April 2019, 11:55 PM   #11
ColnagoC60
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Singapore
Posts: 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by AK797 View Post
Tough one, think 39mm is probably your best size, shame the new one didn't come out.
Yeah agree. Maybe when they decide to use the new in house chrono movement, that’s when they go back to 39. That’ll be a winner
ColnagoC60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2019, 07:12 AM   #12
jrs146
"TRF" Member
 
jrs146's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Josh
Location: Lost in time
Watch: Me Nae Nae
Posts: 9,821
RO Chrono 41 vs RO Chrono 38 vs RO 15500

I haven’t seen a 38mm ROC but from the pictures my gut says it’s going to be too darn small. I’ve owned a 15400 and I now own a white ROC. I wasn’t thrilled with the 15400 for a handful of reasons but the 41mm ROC checks all the boxes for me that the 15400 didn’t. Although it’s on the far side of the spectrum for size I think it really works. Super sporty but all class.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
"Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own."
-Jerome J. Garcia, Robert C. Hunter
jrs146 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2019, 09:45 AM   #13
Kjp061987
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Texas
Watch: PAM512
Posts: 333
Quote:
Originally Posted by jrs146 View Post
I haven’t seen a 38mm ROC but from the pictures my gut says it’s going to be too darn small. I’ve owned a 15400 and I now own a white ROC. I wasn’t thrilled with the 15400 for a handful of reasons but the 41mm ROC checks all the boxes for me that the 15400 didn’t. Although it’s on the far side of the spectrum for size I think it really works. Super sporty but all class.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Great capture! Looks incredible.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Kjp061987 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2019, 11:19 AM   #14
Roy7
"TRF" Member
 
Roy7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Maryland
Watch: 16613, 16570
Posts: 621
I have a 7 inch wrist and found the 38 to be my size. All ROCs wear about 2-3 mm large so it fits just right.

The 41 looked too large.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Roy7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2019, 07:17 PM   #15
Horolojust
"TRF" Member
 
Horolojust's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Australia
Posts: 259
This is how 41mm would wear on smaller 6.5” wrist. I personally prefer 41mm for my wrist, over 37mm.

But I agree with comment above, 39mm is the sweet spot.

https://youtu.be/vK04plXjmdQ


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Horolojust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 April 2019, 12:33 AM   #16
ColnagoC60
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Singapore
Posts: 76
RO Chrono 41 vs RO Chrono 38 vs RO 15500

Wish the boutique would get the 38s soon so I could size them, but in the meantime here are some pics of of the ROC 41 on my 6.6 wrist. I really like the presence and inasmuch as so many people these days talk up small dials (I think that’s more the dinkee effect really) I still like watches that are bold (as part of a collection with variety).







Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
ColnagoC60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 April 2019, 09:15 AM   #17
ColnagoC60
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Singapore
Posts: 76
And for those keen to see how it compares to a Exp2, here is a pic too alongside my Polar.




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
ColnagoC60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 April 2019, 12:47 PM   #18
Amiroo
"TRF" Member
 
Amiroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Canada
Watch: Royal Oak Chrono
Posts: 301
Quote:
Originally Posted by jrs146 View Post
I haven’t seen a 38mm ROC but from the pictures my gut says it’s going to be too darn small. I’ve owned a 15400 and I now own a white ROC. I wasn’t thrilled with the 15400 for a handful of reasons but the 41mm ROC checks all the boxes for me that the 15400 didn’t. Although it’s on the far side of the spectrum for size I think it really works. Super sporty but all class.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Good to know. Swapped my 15400OR for the ROC. Can’t wait for it to arrive!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Chronograph 26331OR
Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 15400OR
Rolex Day-Date II 218235
Rolex GMT-Master II BLNR 116710
Amiroo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.