ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
16 February 2019, 02:43 PM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,406
|
Quote:
The 15202 spans 52.3mm and the 15300 52.7mm, a small but noticeable difference. The proportions are very different as well, you may not notice if you've only experienced te 15300 but once you hold a 15202 you really notice how much better the overall look is. I've owned a 15300, 15400, 26300 and 15202. Hands down the 15202 is my favorite, I only sold it because the non quickset date drove me crazy (the crown feels like you're going to break it every time you manipulate it).
__________________
5230G / 5146G / 124060 / BB58 / '59 Constellation |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.