The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20 January 2016, 04:44 AM   #1
Aamin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 16
5513 Re-Lume?

Does this look re lumed or original? Thinking about purchasing and not sure.

Thanks
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Watch 1.JPG (86.7 KB, 365 views)
File Type: jpg Watch 2.JPG (74.3 KB, 362 views)
Aamin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2016, 06:50 AM   #2
Beaumont Miller II
"TRF" Member
 
Beaumont Miller II's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,615
Did you ask the seller if it was relumed? I am curious as to his answer.
The white paint surrounding each round luminous hour marker on a matte dial is a red flag.
__________________
Beaumont Miller II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2016, 07:10 AM   #3
Aamin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 16
Seller said in his opinion was relumed but was not sure. I am not sure what to look for. Is this a major issue if it was relumed?
Aamin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2016, 07:15 AM   #4
JohnnyNoDate
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 357
Ask the seller to charge the dial and hands with a flashlight and take a photo of the result.

A meters first 5513 should glow briefly (hands and dial).

The light yellow/green patina looks correct, and the white surrounding doesn't necessarily mean it's relumed for this period.

a "glow" photo would help you determine the next step.
JohnnyNoDate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2016, 07:51 AM   #5
descartes
"TRF" Member
 
descartes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: North Shore
Posts: 1,116
Do you know the serial number?
descartes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2016, 07:55 AM   #6
themaninblack
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,058
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beaumont Miller II View Post
Did you ask the seller if it was relumed? I am curious as to his answer.
The white paint surrounding each round luminous hour marker on a matte dial is a red flag.
I assume you are concerned by what appears to be the even appearance of the white surrounding the lume.

My understanding is that the white plots were on the dial before the luminous tritium compound was then applied. As the tritium compound ages, deteriorates, cracks, shrinks, flakes and so on white edges beneath sometimes become more visible, especially when observed in close up. Looking at my 67 matte meters first under a loupe now, some white edges visible and certainly never re-lumed.
themaninblack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2016, 08:19 AM   #7
Aamin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 16
Serial number is 20084xx
Aamin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2016, 12:00 PM   #8
waspy1
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Home!
Posts: 1,259
Not the best of photos but i think not relumed


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
waspy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2016, 02:34 PM   #9
Beaumont Miller II
"TRF" Member
 
Beaumont Miller II's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,615
Quote:
Originally Posted by themaninblack View Post
I assume you are concerned by what appears to be the even appearance of the white surrounding the lume.

My understanding is that the white plots were on the dial before the luminous tritium compound was then applied. As the tritium compound ages, deteriorates, cracks, shrinks, flakes and so on white edges beneath sometimes become more visible, especially when observed in close up. Looking at my 67 matte meters first under a loupe now, some white edges visible and certainly never re-lumed.
What you are observing on your watch is normal aging of tritium over time. This is quite different than what is seen on the two OP's pictures where every single round hour marker has a uniform white circle surrounding the newly applied luminous. The reason the seller thinks the watch may have been relumed is because it has.
__________________
Beaumont Miller II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2016, 03:31 PM   #10
springer
2024 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,196
I agree with John. The missing tritium is too uniform on each market to be accidental.

In the hundreds of watches I've owned, I've never had someone say, "I think it is relumed" without it actually being relumed.

The dial appears relumed to me and yes, it depreciates the value of the dial.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2016, 03:31 PM   #11
themaninblack
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,058
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beaumont Miller II View Post
What you are observing on your watch is normal aging of tritium over time. This is quite different than what is seen on the two OP's pictures where every single round hour marker has a uniform white circle surrounding the newly applied luminous. The reason the seller thinks the watch may have been relumed is because it has.
I agree, the white perimeter of my plots and on other matte dials I have is not uniform.
themaninblack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2016, 09:08 PM   #12
swish77
2024 Pledge Member
 
swish77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,791
Definitely looks relumed. The only thing that is a little curious is that the patina of the hour markers perfectly matches the hands. Perhaps the hands were relumed at the same time.
swish77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2016, 10:25 PM   #13
PVR
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Darien, CT
Posts: 321
I would say it is not relumed. I have seen a few watches with this shiny, shrunken greenish lume and I say it is not relumed. If you can accept and agree that lume shrinks then the uniform shrinkage is correct. If it was applied on all the markers fully and at the same time then why shouldn't they all shrink the same?

No problem with that one but, the flashlight test would help shed some light on the answer :)
PVR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2016, 02:08 AM   #14
Aamin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 16
Thanks for all the feedback everyone. I will have "glow" photos shortly and will post
Aamin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2016, 07:59 AM   #15
descartes
"TRF" Member
 
descartes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: North Shore
Posts: 1,116
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aamin View Post
Serial number is 20084xx
I have a 1,66 serial number 5513 and it has greenish lump similar to the one you posted, which is correct for period. I'm not sure if the greenish tint ran into the 2,XX serial range but you could do some research to check.
descartes is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.