|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
19 September 2016, 12:14 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: US
Posts: 28
|
5512 comments
New to submariners.
Came across this 5512, serial number is 1040000. Anything wrong spotted? Any comments? s-l1600.jpg |
|
|
|
19 September 2016, 12:18 AM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Stuttgart
Posts: 548
|
Re:
None of that looks real.
|
|
|
|
|
19 September 2016, 12:49 AM
|
#3 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,793
|
At a minimum the dial is badly refinished, and the whole watch just looks wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
19 September 2016, 01:07 AM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Jason
Location: Connecticut
Watch: Tudor 7016, 94010
Posts: 256
|
Not even close. Run...run fast
|
|
|
|
|
19 September 2016, 01:08 AM
|
#5 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,391
|
Dial has been poorly refinished and pearl replaced with an aftermarket piece.
The serial number places the case in the Gilt dial era, a loose Gilt dial in acceptable condition will be nearly impossible to find. I'd pass on this one. |
|
|
|
|
19 September 2016, 01:11 AM
|
#6 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Tokyo
Watch: 16800
Posts: 170
|
In addition to the already mentioned, case ruined from polishing
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
