ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
7 March 2018, 08:52 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: florida
Posts: 238
|
Rolex 5513 help needed to authenticate
I have been searching for a nice, original 5513 and recently found this one for sale. I'd appreciate any feedback regarding authenticity and originality of this watch. It is being sold with two inserts. The seller believes the darker insert is original but both the darker one and ghost insert look good to me. Can you tell me if either or both inserts are correct for this watch? I know the bracelet is a later bracelet, but believe the rest is original. Feedback from the forum will be much appreciated.
https://imgur.com/a/rUKPj |
8 March 2018, 12:09 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: florida
Posts: 238
|
Anyone?
|
8 March 2018, 12:44 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Justin S.
Location: Southeastern U.S.
Watch: 5513 Sub
Posts: 761
|
The faded insert appears to be a later insert from a
Sapphire model 14060 with the metal encircled pearl & also there is a slight gap between the bezel & that insert which would make sense for this insert to be a hair small.
The spare insert in the plastic appears to be the period correct one but Im not 100% sure as it could be from a Tudor Sub. Justin |
8 March 2018, 02:02 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: florida
Posts: 238
|
Good eye Justin, thanks for that.
|
8 March 2018, 02:56 AM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: John Baker III
Location: Spring,Texas
Watch: 1971 Red Sub
Posts: 2,221
|
Serial number suggests early 1970 vintage; if so, the crown is not original to the watch. It should be a Twin Lock (no dots).
__________________
As I've grown older, I've learned that pleasing everyone is impossible, but pissing off everyone is a piece of cake. |
8 March 2018, 04:39 AM | #6 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: RedSox Nation
Watch: U Talkn Bout Wilis
Posts: 5,421
|
The loose insert is a long 5 from late 50s to 1968 and the watch (legit) is from roughly 1969 so possible original insert. The insert on the watch is not correct from when it was made. I am not expert enough on the dial to know if that is the appropriate dial for 69 just after end of Meter's First but follow this post and site for accurate info: https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=344403
Inside of caseback would have stamping to (help) indicate when it was made.
__________________
I'm a sailor peg. And I've lost my leg. Climbing up the top sails. I've lost my leg! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.