The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16 October 2021, 11:47 AM   #1
WatchCollectorandFan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4
Tudor Lollipop Hand Submariner

Why is Rolex hell bent on replacing a vintage Tudor “Lollipop” hands with Mercedes type hands? Specifically, why would Rolex decline working on a watch that has those rare Lollipop hands?

Last edited by WatchCollectorandFan; 16 October 2021 at 11:48 AM.. Reason: misspellings
WatchCollectorandFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2021, 12:32 PM   #2
zapokee
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Japan
Posts: 4,344
Quote:
Originally Posted by WatchCollectorandFan View Post
Why is Rolex hell bent on replacing a vintage Tudor “Lollipop” hands with Mercedes type hands? Specifically, why would Rolex decline working on a watch that has those rare Lollipop hands?
Rolex likes to update everything and make watches as new as possible. They don't make those hands anymore.

They're not the people to go to with vintage stuff.

Luckily there are sympathetic independent restorers who will service vintage Tudor.
zapokee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2021, 01:30 PM   #3
Dr.Smellody
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 5,193
The lollipop has no structure behind the hand. So it shrinks, cracks, and falls out. The "Mercedes," cathedral hands have backing for the hands to adhere to.
Dr.Smellody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2021, 02:13 PM   #4
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 5,894
Quote:
Originally Posted by WatchCollectorandFan View Post
Why is Rolex hell bent on replacing a vintage Tudor “Lollipop” hands with Mercedes type hands? Specifically, why would Rolex decline working on a watch that has those rare Lollipop hands?
Which is it? Are they declining to work on the watch or requiring replacement of the hands? It's pretty standard for Rolex to require replacement of hands where the lume is compromised, since they claim that loose lume can damage the watch during the warranty period. However, I would be surprised if they totally declined to work on the watch.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2021, 05:10 PM   #5
WatchCollectorandFan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4
They are telling me they can’t work on this watch and referring this to a NYC repair person. I am totally disappointed in them. Would I kill the value with the new hands?
WatchCollectorandFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2021, 10:51 PM   #6
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 5,894
Quote:
Originally Posted by WatchCollectorandFan View Post
They are telling me they can’t work on this watch and referring this to a NYC repair person. I am totally disappointed in them. Would I kill the value with the new hands?
Well, it's weird that they are unwilling to work on it, I would have expected they would just insist on replacing the hands. Maybe that's not the reason they are refusing to work on it. RSC will decline to service a watch if they don't have parts for it.

Anyway, it's for the best IMO. Use an independent and keep things original. Without a photo, we can't really give you advice, but if the lume isn't too bad, it can just be stabilized.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17 October 2021, 01:45 AM   #7
WatchCollectorandFan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4
“stabilize” lume

What does it mean to “stabilize” the Lume?
WatchCollectorandFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 October 2021, 01:51 AM   #8
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,040
Quote:
Originally Posted by WatchCollectorandFan View Post
They are telling me they can’t work on this watch and referring this to a NYC repair person. I am totally disappointed in them. Would I kill the value with the new hands?
The value in older watches is typically in the hands and dial, although the rest of it needs to be sound as well.

Rolex frequently turns away vintage watches where the customer may cause a stink about "lost value" when they replace cosmetic parts.

Older lume can be stabilized by attaching a micro-thin backing and applying a clear lacquer to keep it from falling apart. Not much different than stabilizing centuries old art work.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 October 2021, 02:37 AM   #9
Mark020
"TRF" Member
 
Mark020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 2,090
Pic would help...
Mark020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 October 2021, 03:59 AM   #10
WatchCollectorandFan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4
When the watch is available and back. How does one post a picture on this sight?
WatchCollectorandFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 October 2021, 07:12 AM   #11
zapokee
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Japan
Posts: 4,344
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan S View Post
However, I would be surprised if they totally declined to work on the watch.
My RSC (Tokyo) also declined to service my Tudor Snowflake, saying it was too old. It's a bog-standard movement that any competent watchmaker can service.

As Larry says above, Rolex know that replacing vintage parts will tank the value of the watch. I think they're actually doing you a favor by indirectly saying "We're not the guys you need for this vintage piece. The service we provide will compromise its value," but of course they can't say that directly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WatchCollectorandFan View Post
Would I kill the value with the new hands?
Yes, that would reduce its value significantly. Just get an independent watchmaker to restore the current hands. There are plenty of trusted restorers in the US, like LA Watchworks.

Stabilizing the hands involves applying lacquer to the back of the lume so that it looks the same but won't fall out.
zapokee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 October 2021, 07:32 AM   #12
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 5,894
Quote:
Originally Posted by zapokee View Post
My RSC (Tokyo) also declined to service my Tudor Snowflake, saying it was too old.
Agreed, that doesn't surprise me. I thought the OP was implying that RSC refused because of the hands specifically.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.