The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 30 January 2016, 08:30 PM   #1
shy06002
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New York
Posts: 566
First Audemars! 15202

So I finally pulled the trigger and got the 15202. Some what premature of a decision to be honest but I wanted to get everyone's opinion. I have exactly a 6' wrist so the 15202 actually sits on my wrists sorta funny. I pretty much assumed that by taking some of the links out it would solve the issue of the lugs not hugging my wrist but it didn't. The watch doesn't really taper to my wrists, it's very stiff and there is a lot of space. What are my options? Is there a older bracelet that I can swap with that fits better? Does it looks like it doesn't fit my wrist? Should I just get the thicker 39mm or switch to a 41mm?






shy06002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 January 2016, 08:59 PM   #2
Psmith
"TRF" Member
 
Psmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
Looks great, congrats
__________________
Psmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 January 2016, 09:07 PM   #3
eonflux
"TRF" Member
 
eonflux's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SNA
Posts: 3,614
Congrats!!
Hmmm, may be hard to get a snugger fit
The bracelet comes off the case with limited articulation
Hope you get it to work for you
Great looking watch
eonflux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 January 2016, 10:56 PM   #4
ap1
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,077
This is a tough call. I have 6.5 and get a bit of that too. Are you even able to return it? I think I'd say 15300 or the 37mm. It's a wonderful watch, good luck whatever you decide

Sent from my KFJWI using Tapatalk 2
ap1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 January 2016, 11:09 PM   #5
SpunkyQ8
"TRF" Member
 
SpunkyQ8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Aj
Location: Kuwait
Watch: RM,AP,PP,RLX,PAM
Posts: 1,056
Congrats! Great pickup
SpunkyQ8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 January 2016, 11:33 PM   #6
kilyung
2024 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,873
I've got a 6.5" wrist and it's perfect on me. My wrist is also pretty flat. The watch looks great on you but up close may look too big. Try taking some distance pictures.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 January 2016, 11:49 PM   #7
Vipes
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,842
I think it looks fine. I think you should keep it like it is. Removing more links will only accentuate the gaps between wrist and watch. Congrats!
Vipes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 January 2016, 11:52 PM   #8
manilenyo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: manila
Posts: 2,541
Looks good on your wrist, congrats!
manilenyo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 January 2016, 12:14 AM   #9
ap1
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
I've got a 6.5" wrist and it's perfect on me. My wrist is also pretty flat. The watch looks great on you but up close may look too big. Try taking some distance pictures.
Yeah, it's tough with pics so close. I think the condition is just part of owning a jumbo unless maybe you have 8inch to close those gaps
Attached Images
File Type: jpg image.jpg (96.5 KB, 1165 views)
ap1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 January 2016, 12:16 AM   #10
Hairdude1
"TRF" Member
 
Hairdude1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
Stunning! Congrats
__________________
Instagram: @Hairdude
Watches in Collection 5070R, 5522A, 214270 MK1, 228238

16750, 26401, 5711, 116718, 116710LN, 116300, 16710"Coke", 372, 15300, 15703 (All Flipped)
Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas GTG 2016
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017
Official Member 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas Int'l GTG 2018
Hairdude1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 January 2016, 12:32 AM   #11
Fiery
"TRF" Member
 
Fiery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Europe
Watch: Sub-C 116610LN
Posts: 2,649
Congrats, I think it looks just fine. You cannot make it fit better, since the fixed lugs shape wouldn't allow that. That's why I cannot wear the 41mm RO or the 42+ mm Offshores with my 6.3 inch wrist. The 39mm is a bit of a stretch for me, but it looks okay. The 37mm RO would be best for me (and IMHO for you too, actually), but I'd only get that if it was offered with a blue or black dial and steel case. But even then the 15450ST would be an inferior choice to the 15202ST in many ways (prestige, heritage, resale chances, overall "wow" factor, etc).

If you want another integrated bracelet steel watch with a great heritage, check out the IWC Ingenieur 3239 and of course the Nautilus 5711. They both have such lug shape that favors slim wrists way better than the Royal Oak's. Truth be told, I wouldn't give up any Royal Oaks in favor of those watches :) But, I can totally see those 3 watches (RO, 3239, 5711) co-exist in my collection. I'm 33% way there, rocking the 3239 Laureus right now
__________________
"In an age of obsolescence and gimmickry, this simple classic virtue of a Rolex is indeed a rarity." (Rolex ad from 1974)
Fiery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 January 2016, 12:45 AM   #12
Daryl
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Daryl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 3,331
Beautiful watch. Looks good on you


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
2FA-Enabled


Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas International GTG 2016
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2019
Daryl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 January 2016, 12:48 AM   #13
travisb
2024 Pledge Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 32,300
I think it looks great on you. I wouldn't replace it with anything else.
travisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 January 2016, 12:59 AM   #14
texex91
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
Congrats and enjoy it!
texex91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 January 2016, 01:06 AM   #15
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,270
I think it looks alright, APs tend to wear large anyway, congrats!
AK797 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 31 January 2016, 01:08 AM   #16
rossi46
2024 Pledge Member
 
rossi46's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Dan
Location: CT, by a lake
Watch: 16570
Posts: 1,493
It's too big. I disagree with the previous posters - it doesn't look good. The lugs are clearly hanging off the sides of your wrist - the basic "test" for judging watch size.

I empathize with you, OP, as I have 6.5" wrists, but that watch is not for you.
__________________
A watch is about the entire package, not just its appearance. Any large watch company not making its own movement is not making a watch at all; they’re just playing dress-up. --The Watch Snob
rossi46 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 January 2016, 01:17 AM   #17
martinr
"TRF" Member
 
martinr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: California
Posts: 3,099
It looks ok but a little loose, has it been sized yet?
martinr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 January 2016, 01:38 AM   #18
dr.ns23
"TRF" Member
 
dr.ns23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Somewhere
Watch: 15202
Posts: 430
To be honest, I don't think it is big. The watch is beautiful and looks good on your wrist. I am sure you will get used to it very soon! I have a small wrist too (6.3) and I am seriously considering the 15202. Congratulations and wear it in good health...
dr.ns23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 January 2016, 02:01 AM   #19
mtl514
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Adam S
Location: montreal
Posts: 344
I have a small wrist and was able to size it well so that it fits me perfectly with 0 gap, mine is the older pre 2015 version which has a slightly thinner band but I don't think that matters. My band has 19 links in total (10 links at 6pm and 9 links at 12pm)
mtl514 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 January 2016, 02:16 AM   #20
csi-n
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Sam
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 1,042
I think it looks okay but I also think that how it feels to you is the more important question. If the watch is comfortable on your wrist and it feels right to you, then keep it. If the opposite is the case and you will always have doubts about wearing it, it's time to return it (if you can).

Good luck,

Sam
csi-n is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 January 2016, 04:04 AM   #21
shy06002
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New York
Posts: 566
Thanks for the input guys! I'll be going to the AP store for the 3rd time to retry on some watches haha
shy06002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 January 2016, 06:25 AM   #22
Fiery
"TRF" Member
 
Fiery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Europe
Watch: Sub-C 116610LN
Posts: 2,649
Quote:
Originally Posted by shy06002 View Post
Thanks for the input guys! I'll be going to the AP store for the 3rd time to retry on some watches haha
Try to make some photos there. Also bring a friend and ask him/her to make a photo of your wrist from a few feets distance. Sometimes closeup wrist shots can mislead you to believe the watch looks off on you.
__________________
"In an age of obsolescence and gimmickry, this simple classic virtue of a Rolex is indeed a rarity." (Rolex ad from 1974)
Fiery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 January 2016, 01:54 PM   #23
shy06002
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New York
Posts: 566
I didn't get to take any pictures but I tried on the 15450. It's a real shame this one doesn't come in the blue dial otherwise I would be all over it!!! It fits like perfection and it really isn't that much smaller. I've had a 36mm datejust so I'd be fine with it but I"m just not a fan of the white dial. Hopefully they'll come out with a blue dial sometime soon. Whoever engineered the bracelet for the 15202 should have taken us small wrist people into account :( It's pretty weird how the 15450 fits perfectly, the 15400 fits well, but the 15202 has the worst fit.
shy06002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 January 2016, 03:08 PM   #24
el1125
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 3,578
Quote:
Originally Posted by shy06002 View Post
I didn't get to take any pictures but I tried on the 15450. It's a real shame this one doesn't come in the blue dial otherwise I would be all over it!!! It fits like perfection and it really isn't that much smaller. I've had a 36mm datejust so I'd be fine with it but I"m just not a fan of the white dial. Hopefully they'll come out with a blue dial sometime soon. Whoever engineered the bracelet for the 15202 should have taken us small wrist people into account :( It's pretty weird how the 15450 fits perfectly, the 15400 fits well, but the 15202 has the worst fit.
Is your 202 loose on you? Maybe you need to make it tighter still by removing an extra link or two? I'm not certain though. Mine fits perfect to me but sorry I don't know my wrist size
el1125 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 January 2016, 03:11 PM   #25
el1125
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 3,578
Quote:
Originally Posted by shy06002 View Post
I didn't get to take any pictures but I tried on the 15450. It's a real shame this one doesn't come in the blue dial otherwise I would be all over it!!! It fits like perfection and it really isn't that much smaller. I've had a 36mm datejust so I'd be fine with it but I"m just not a fan of the white dial. Hopefully they'll come out with a blue dial sometime soon. Whoever engineered the bracelet for the 15202 should have taken us small wrist people into account :( It's pretty weird how the 15450 fits perfectly, the 15400 fits well, but the 15202 has the worst fit.
Also I believe btw on most people the 202 fits as yours does..
el1125 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 January 2016, 05:15 PM   #26
Abdullasaif
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Dubai
Watch: bipolar
Posts: 2,854
Congrats!!! Welcome to the club this watch is literally unflippable


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Abdullasaif is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 January 2016, 11:40 PM   #27
Dolor Doc
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: 'merica
Watch: AP 15400
Posts: 151
Congrats! As someone who also has a thin wrist, I feel your pain. I agree that the overall fit is not ideal (full disclosure my 15400st fits about the same way), but the watch looks absolutely amazing on your wrist. If you like the way it feels there, rest assured it looks fantastic. Definitely enjoy that beauty.
Dolor Doc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 January 2016, 11:59 PM   #28
busytimmy
"TRF" Member
 
busytimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Sydney, Australia
Watch: ing the detectives
Posts: 3,745
Not to be a party pooper, but I don't agree with the majority here. OP, I think your gut feeling is correct: the watch wears a bit large/awkward on your wrist.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
busytimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 February 2016, 12:40 AM   #29
gummy
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
gummy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Thomas
Location: Midwest USA
Watch: AP PP Rolex
Posts: 3,302
Great Pick up - Classic!
gummy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 February 2016, 01:06 AM   #30
mps354
2024 Pledge Member
 
mps354's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: CT
Posts: 8,974
Beautiful, congrats!
mps354 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.