ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

japenney · 15 March 2016, 12:14 AM

isn't the 114060 a bit smaller than the 116610? I would expect it to fit a bit better.

tmehanna · 15 March 2016, 12:20 AM

I have had this problem with almost all watches since I lost weight and two links off my bracelets which I used to wear complete. I have since started wearing my watches above the wrist bone (elbow side) and tight enough not to slip past the bone towards my hand. All is perfect now. At first I didn't like the look very much but now I think the watches look even better there.

Touring · 15 March 2016, 12:23 AM

The GMT will sit flatter there's no Glidelock for microadjustment so it might be a wash. Also, if the stainless steel Sub is "hurting" you, I'd rethink the decision to get a PM piece.

japenney · 15 March 2016, 12:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Touring

The GMT will sit flatter there's no Glidelock for microadjustment so it might be a wash. Also, if the stainless steel Sub is "hurting" you, I'd rethink the decision to get a PM piece.

Possibly, but I don't think the weight is an issue its how high the watch sits on my wrist. I might grab a SS GMT for a trial run.

travisb · 15 March 2016, 01:17 AM

Good luck with the GMT. Definitely sits flatter. Never had an issue with the Sub but I do prefer the fit of the GMT.

mater · 15 March 2016, 01:21 AM

Yep. Not a very comfortable watch on my wrist either, same size as yours.

Sits too tall and clunky, doesnt slide under a cuff well either.

My GMTii sits lower and wears lighter. Much better fit for a small wrist.

ppalasthira · 15 March 2016, 01:24 AM

Sorry to hear that the SubC isn't working for you. How long have you had it for? Some watches take a while longer to get used to. I've had mine for a month now and it took me almost 2 weeks of fiddling around with the link configs to get the correct fit. It has been the most comfortable Rolex that I have ever owned. I have tiny 6.25 inch wrists btw.

I currently own both the SubC and the GMT2C. The GMT2C does have a very slight thinner case but not by that much. It does ride a bit lower but not much. I highly doubt that you will find the GMT more comfortable than the SubC. Especially, without the Glidelock.

I think you should give it another chance before flipping it.

Just my 2c.

Boaters · 15 March 2016, 01:35 AM

8 inch wrist + Sub-C = Love ... My Sub-C is my most comforatable watch I have.

Chubbador · 15 March 2016, 02:27 AM

I've got minuscule wrists and my 114060 fits perfectly, 4 full links at 12 and 6 (not including the attachments) and then the glidelock at its tightest setting. Could well be down to wrist shape though.

tkerrmd · 15 March 2016, 02:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by japenney

Yes my Daytona and exp 1 39mm are perfect. The sub sits so high on my wrist... I think that has something to do with it. It is not my intention to bash a highly iconic watch. After owning several modern Rolex watches the Sub is by far the least comfortable even with the glide-lock (I have tried every setting).

Recently after 6 years experience of owning Rolex watches comfort has become the major factor for determining if I keep a watch. At the beginning I was very influenced by Rolex watches that were "iconic" among other factors. Some people say that a submariner belongs in every collection - for me that may not be the case! :).

all good, not every watch is for everyone

2Redbulls · 15 March 2016, 03:04 AM

Weird, I don't really understand how having a slightly thicker case back would "hurt"?? I have a 6.75 inch wrist also and don't have a problem with the SubC - not even the SD4K which has an even thicker case back.

What about a Yachtmaster? I have one also and it does sit flatter then the Sub.

Stuxnet · 15 March 2016, 03:10 AM

Not sure what the issue is.

I have a 6.5 inch wrist. I have found every Rolex I own very comfortable to wear. Like I'm not wearing a watch. Subs, Daytonas, GMT, Explorer, Datejust et al.

I also wear boxers, not briefs. No problems here either.

Snake Oil · 15 March 2016, 03:11 AM

My 114060 is the most comfortable Rolex I've owned!

Memphis · 15 March 2016, 04:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chubbador

I've got minuscule wrists... 4 full links at 12 and 6...

Onikage · 15 March 2016, 06:19 AM

To be fair you do have two of the notably more comfy models.

yorkef · 15 March 2016, 06:33 AM

I have 6.75" wrist and SubC is no issue, but compared to BLNR, it's slightly less comfortable than the GMT but still can't say uncomfortable. Maybe adjusting the bracelet link and micro adjust ing glidelock will help you.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Porter · 15 March 2016, 07:40 AM

I'm 7 inch wrist. The only new case I felt comfortable is the SD4K. Why? No idea. I feel very well with 5 digits subs and extremely comfortable with 36mm cases!! Just wait a bit and if after some changes in bracelet or clasp your problem is not solved then think about sell it!!

Sublover2166 · 15 March 2016, 08:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by japenney

The guy above me just got 100 pms (careful probably a scam)

Why not post a wrist shot with your Sub? I have a 7.5 inch wrist and since I am lefty, wear watches on the right wrist. I have a 5 digit Sub and a newer 6 digit Hulk. Wore the 16613 for every day for almost 18 years until the Hulk came and never once did I ever have comfort issues. My wrist is also relatively flat where the Sub sits, so maybe I'm just lucky. Not everyone has the same shape wrist. Only issue I have is in the hot weather when my arm sweats and then the watch tends to gravitate towards my hand and I have to push the watch back up on the wrist.

cornerstore · 15 March 2016, 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by japenney

I just wanted to let people know that my 116610 is not comfortable on my 6.75 inch wrist. It sits way too proud and whenever I wear it anything but very loose it feels like it is hurting me.. Has anyone else had this experience? My 39mm explorer feels good. My Daytona feels good. Hoping I will have more luck with the gmt-c as it sits lower on wrist. Just a heads up for people with small wrists looking to get a sub. I really love everything about my 116610 except how it feels when worn even a tiny bit snug.

It's all about the comfort of the downturned style lugs such as on the Explorer and Daytona. Lug styles are something that seldom gets discussed. I have the Explorer and Daytona, I had two Rolex subs that I sold for the reasons you mention. If you want a Sub, the Rolex subs and Tudor subs with plastic crystals are way more comfortable.

japenney · 15 March 2016, 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sublover2166

Why not post a wrist shot with your Sub? I have a 7.5 inch wrist and since I am lefty, wear watches on the right wrist. I have a 5 digit Sub and a newer 6 digit Hulk. Wore the 16613 for every day for almost 18 years until the Hulk came and never once did I ever have comfort issues. My wrist is also relatively flat where the Sub sits, so maybe I'm just lucky. Not everyone has the same shape wrist. Only issue I have is in the hot weather when my arm sweats and then the watch tends to gravitate towards my hand and I have to push the watch back up on the wrist.

wont let me upload pics in same post.

japenney · 15 March 2016, 08:38 AM

explorer & daytona

WyoWatch · 15 March 2016, 08:58 AM

Don't know what to tell you. I have a 6.5" wrist and my 116610 is the most comfortable watch on a bracelet I've ever owned. So comfortable I forget it's there. Now my old 14060m on the other hand... it got sold because I never could get a comfortable fit with the bracelet.

japenney · 15 March 2016, 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WyoWatch

Don't know what to tell you. I have a 6.5" wrist and my 116610 is the most comfortable watch on a bracelet I've ever owned. So comfortable I forget it's there. Now my old 14060m on the other hand... it got sold because I never could get a comfortable fit with the bracelet.

i suppose its just simply not as comftorable as my daytona and explorer 1. What can you do..they have me spoiled.....maybe i can get a rubber B for the SUB?

Daryl · 15 March 2016, 09:04 AM

I have a 116610 and I sold it for the same reason. My BLNR is perfect fit on me.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

jrs146 · 15 March 2016, 09:05 AM

Gmt does sit flatter and is a bit more comfy

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Partagas · 15 March 2016, 09:07 AM

I also have a small wrist and in the interest of comfort have stayed with smaller watches, without regret. While I would love a Sub, comfort matters and the 36mm Rolex are perfect and completely comfortable for me. I want to love what I wear, so I'd flip an uncomfortable watch. YMMV.

Sublover2166 · 15 March 2016, 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by japenney

i suppose its just simply not as comftorable as my daytona and explorer 1. What can you do..they have me spoiled.....maybe i can get a rubber B for the SUB?

The Sub case has more bulk than a Daytona or Explorer 1. Maybe that is the difference in comfort. I wear my Subs above the wrist bone farther away from the hand.

droptopman · 15 March 2016, 09:14 AM

I have the same issue with the 6 digit reference Subs. I have a bony 7.3 inch wrist and the larger CB on the modern Sub just does not fit me good. Tied to love it as I really like the look, tried several different set ups with the clasp and where I wear it on the wrist, but none really worked out. The modern GMT CB is flatter and fits me much better, but not as good as vintage. The 4 and 5 digit models wear much better on me. Maybe try a 5 digit Sub and see how you like it.

SamiKssiaa · 15 March 2016, 09:19 AM

Get a GMT, fits under a cuff, sits better on the wrist.

lp2001 · 15 March 2016, 09:20 AM

I have 6.25" wrist and it fits just fine. It's my daily watch.

15 March 2016, 06:19 AM	#45
Onikage "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: England Watch: 16710, 16628 Posts: 7,757	To be fair you do have two of the notably more comfy models. __________________ GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4

15 March 2016, 09:04 AM	#54
Daryl 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: USA Posts: 3,337	I have a 116610 and I sold it for the same reason. My BLNR is perfect fit on me. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ 2FA-Enabled Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas International GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2019

15 March 2016, 09:05 AM	#55
jrs146 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Real Name: Josh Location: Lost in time Watch: Me Nae Nae Posts: 9,821	Gmt does sit flatter and is a bit more comfy Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ "Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own." -Jerome J. Garcia, Robert C. Hunter

15 March 2016, 12:14 AM	#31
japenney "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Real Name: Josh Location: Canada Watch: undecided Posts: 4,777	isn't the 114060 a bit smaller than the 116610? I would expect it to fit a bit better.

15 March 2016, 12:20 AM	#32
tmehanna "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: Cairo Watch: LV,BLNR,Serti DJII Posts: 145	I have had this problem with almost all watches since I lost weight and two links off my bracelets which I used to wear complete. I have since started wearing my watches above the wrist bone (elbow side) and tight enough not to slip past the bone towards my hand. All is perfect now. At first I didn't like the look very much but now I think the watches look even better there.

15 March 2016, 12:23 AM	#33
Touring 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Location: Hoth Posts: 1,242	The GMT will sit flatter there's no Glidelock for microadjustment so it might be a wash. Also, if the stainless steel Sub is "hurting" you, I'd rethink the decision to get a PM piece.

15 March 2016, 01:17 AM	#35
travisb 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Travis Location: FL / NYC Watch: Yes.. Posts: 32,335	Good luck with the GMT. Definitely sits flatter. Never had an issue with the Sub but I do prefer the fit of the GMT.

15 March 2016, 01:21 AM	#36
mater "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: toronto Posts: 89	Yep. Not a very comfortable watch on my wrist either, same size as yours. Sits too tall and clunky, doesnt slide under a cuff well either. My GMTii sits lower and wears lighter. Much better fit for a small wrist.

15 March 2016, 01:24 AM	#37
ppalasthira Banned Join Date: May 2007 Location: ASK Watch: SubC.5711.D500 Posts: 2,236	Sorry to hear that the SubC isn't working for you. How long have you had it for? Some watches take a while longer to get used to. I've had mine for a month now and it took me almost 2 weeks of fiddling around with the link configs to get the correct fit. It has been the most comfortable Rolex that I have ever owned. I have tiny 6.25 inch wrists btw. I currently own both the SubC and the GMT2C. The GMT2C does have a very slight thinner case but not by that much. It does ride a bit lower but not much. I highly doubt that you will find the GMT more comfortable than the SubC. Especially, without the Glidelock. I think you should give it another chance before flipping it. Just my 2c.

15 March 2016, 01:35 AM	#38
Boaters 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2015 Real Name: Mike Location: Pacific Northwest Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD Posts: 10,649	8 inch wrist + Sub-C = Love ... My Sub-C is my most comforatable watch I have.

15 March 2016, 02:27 AM	#39
Chubbador "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2015 Location: UK Posts: 18	I've got minuscule wrists and my 114060 fits perfectly, 4 full links at 12 and 6 (not including the attachments) and then the glidelock at its tightest setting. Could well be down to wrist shape though.

15 March 2016, 03:04 AM	#41
2Redbulls "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Tom Location: Morgan Hill, CA Watch: I give up.. Posts: 719	Weird, I don't really understand how having a slightly thicker case back would "hurt"?? I have a 6.75 inch wrist also and don't have a problem with the SubC - not even the SD4K which has an even thicker case back. What about a Yachtmaster? I have one also and it does sit flatter then the Sub.

15 March 2016, 03:10 AM	#42
Stuxnet Banned Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: NYC Posts: 570	Not sure what the issue is. I have a 6.5 inch wrist. I have found every Rolex I own very comfortable to wear. Like I'm not wearing a watch. Subs, Daytonas, GMT, Explorer, Datejust et al. I also wear boxers, not briefs. No problems here either.

15 March 2016, 03:11 AM	#43
Snake Oil "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2015 Location: Durham NC USA Watch: 114060 Posts: 9	My 114060 is the most comfortable Rolex I've owned!

15 March 2016, 06:33 AM	#46
yorkef "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: USA Posts: 155	I have 6.75" wrist and SubC is no issue, but compared to BLNR, it's slightly less comfortable than the GMT but still can't say uncomfortable. Maybe adjusting the bracelet link and micro adjust ing glidelock will help you. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

15 March 2016, 07:40 AM	#47
Porter "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2015 Real Name: Carlos Location: Eivissa Watch: Rolex, Tudor.... Posts: 1,635	I'm 7 inch wrist. The only new case I felt comfortable is the SD4K. Why? No idea. I feel very well with 5 digits subs and extremely comfortable with 36mm cases!! Just wait a bit and if after some changes in bracelet or clasp your problem is not solved then think about sell it!!

15 March 2016, 08:58 AM	#52
WyoWatch "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Chad Location: USA Watch: 1675 GMT and Sub C Posts: 1,443	Don't know what to tell you. I have a 6.5" wrist and my 116610 is the most comfortable watch on a bracelet I've ever owned. So comfortable I forget it's there. Now my old 14060m on the other hand... it got sold because I never could get a comfortable fit with the bracelet.

15 March 2016, 09:07 AM	#56
Partagas "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2016 Location: USA Watch: Rolex DD Posts: 306	I also have a small wrist and in the interest of comfort have stayed with smaller watches, without regret. While I would love a Sub, comfort matters and the 36mm Rolex are perfect and completely comfortable for me. I want to love what I wear, so I'd flip an uncomfortable watch. YMMV.

15 March 2016, 09:14 AM	#58
droptopman "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2015 Real Name: Mark Location: Washington State Watch: SUBS and GMT's! Posts: 9,664	I have the same issue with the 6 digit reference Subs. I have a bony 7.3 inch wrist and the larger CB on the modern Sub just does not fit me good. Tied to love it as I really like the look, tried several different set ups with the clasp and where I wear it on the wrist, but none really worked out. The modern GMT CB is flatter and fits me much better, but not as good as vintage. The 4 and 5 digit models wear much better on me. Maybe try a 5 digit Sub and see how you like it.

15 March 2016, 09:19 AM	#59
SamiKssiaa Banned Join Date: Oct 2015 Location: Scotland Watch: 116710BLNR Posts: 292	Get a GMT, fits under a cuff, sits better on the wrist.

15 March 2016, 09:20 AM	#60
lp2001 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2015 Location: NorCal, US Watch: SubC, GrandSeiko Posts: 110	I have 6.25" wrist and it fits just fine. It's my daily watch.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)