ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

emtee · 13 February 2021, 11:09 PM

Considering a trade but a bit apprehensive about the 47mm size.

I have a 6.5” wrist and 44mm luminor fits me fine.

I hear Radiomir fits smaller but as this model doesn’t have wire lugs would this still be the case?

Any wrist shots of a 47mm non wire lug Radiomir on a similar size wrist would be appreciated.

Cheers

Cru Jones · 13 February 2021, 11:33 PM

1940 Rads are basically Luminors without the device protecting the crown, so I don’t think there will be a difference in size.

Still a great watch. MM dials are special.

emtee · 13 February 2021, 11:38 PM

That was my fear. So it’s basically like a 372 minus crown guard?

372 looked too big on me when I tried it on sadly.

You’re right about the dial, looks awesome but don’t wanna look like a kid who borrowed his Dad’s watch

brandrea · 13 February 2021, 11:39 PM

Good morning Matt

Here is my 690, 1940's case. I have a flat, wide shaped, 7" wrist.

IMHO it will come down to the shape of your wrist more so than the size.

I do agree the Rad with wire lugs wears smaller than the 1940 Rad with lugs, which wears smaller than the Luminor.

From my wearing experience, its much more comfortable than any of the larger Rolex divers (Dblue or SD43) due to its flat case back and cushion case shape. The lugs on the 40's case also taper down toward the wrist which helps make it wear extremely comfortable.

FWIW, I've always wanted to add a wire lug RAD but I find they wear a touch top heavy. YMMV

20201207_135937.jpg 20191101_142800.jpg 20190807_074718.jpg 20190322_124144.jpg 20180802_141320.jpg

Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk

emtee · 13 February 2021, 11:55 PM

Thanks Brian, I always enjoy seeing photos of your beautiful 690

Can I ask what the lug to lug measurement is?

brandrea · 14 February 2021, 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by emtee

Thanks Brian, I always enjoy seeing photos of your beautiful 690

Can I ask what the lug to lug measurement is?

Thanks my friend

The lug to lug is almost 57mm, so it doesn’t come pretty close to taking up my whole wrist.

TannerBoyl · 14 February 2021, 02:32 AM

Brandrea,

That 690 looks fantastic on your wrist!

emtee · 14 February 2021, 02:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brandrea

Thanks my friend

The lug to lug is almost 57mm, so it doesn’t come pretty close to taking up my whole wrist.

Thanks. Sadly I think that would be pushing the boundaries a little too far. Shame as the watch looks awesome. Damn my small wrists

martinr · 14 February 2021, 04:08 AM

Too big. 6.75 wrist.

brandrea · 14 February 2021, 04:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TannerBoyl

Brandrea,

That 690 looks fantastic on your wrist!

Thanks Steve

emtee · 14 February 2021, 05:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by martinr

Too big. 6.75 wrist.

Yep that’s what I thought. I so wanted it to work but guess it’s not meant to be

brandrea · 14 February 2021, 05:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by martinr

Too big. 6.75 wrist.

To be fair, I can make any watch look too large for my wrist from close up

I do agree OP, it’s probably pushing the limit but as I mentioned, it depends more on your wrist shape than size

japenney · 14 February 2021, 06:24 AM

My 587 is one of my favorite Panerai on my 6.75 inch wrist. I don't really care what anyone thinks, it is about if YOU like it on your wrist.

martinr · 14 February 2021, 07:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brandrea

To be fair, I can make any watch look too large for my wrist from close up

I do agree OP, it’s probably pushing the limit but as I mentioned, it depends more on your wrist shape than size

It’s too big from a mile away on my wrist.

brandrea · 14 February 2021, 07:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by martinr

It’s too big from a mile away on my wrist.

I'm sure it is

I just wanted the OP to understand it has more to do with wrist shape than size

Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk

mailman · 14 February 2021, 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TannerBoyl

Brandrea,

That 690 looks fantastic on your wrist!

Yes it does

martinr · 14 February 2021, 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brandrea

I'm sure it is

I just wanted the OP to understand it has more to do with wrist shape than size

Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk

I’ve owned five. 44mm is about right for my wrist. Something else to think about is what shirt or sweater works. I like to wear the same watch for a week or two so rather than think about what to wear I sold them all. 587 looks great though.

Gargamel · 16 February 2021, 05:01 AM

I had many 44mm luminors, a 372 and currently have this 587.

44 looks better on my wrist.
But a Pam should wear large.
I never love the balance and weight of the steel bettarinis (005/390).
Whereas the 372 and 587 have a better distributed weight.
Plus the absence of crown guards helps in comfort a lot versus the 372.

It's the most comfy Pam i have owned after the 210.

japenney · 17 February 2021, 07:59 AM

587 and 687 stored in a old broken winder. Cheers.

Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk

ASW1 · 17 February 2021, 08:57 AM

I have a 587 and have around 6.75" wrist. I personally find it wears well. Not much different to a 44mm Luminor.

I also have a 422 and the 587 definitely wears smaller. The crown guard adds to bulk on the wrist.

https://r.tapatalk.com/shareLink/top...ink_source=app

Sent from my moto g 5G plus using Tapatalk

emtee · 17 February 2021, 06:43 PM

Thanks for all the replies.

I think this is one where i'm going to wait until things open up again and I can go and try one on before making the decision.

Gargamel · 17 February 2021, 10:47 PM

AL9C1 · 4 March 2021, 04:00 PM

^^^
That looks fantastic. First time I’m noticing this model. Excellent.

crazycarlitos · 4 March 2021, 07:01 PM

Nice!

Quote:

Originally Posted by japenney

587 and 687 stored in a old broken winder. Cheers.

Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk

13 February 2021, 11:09 PM	#1
emtee "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2017 Real Name: Matt Location: UK Posts: 1,235	Thoughts on Radiomir 587 Considering a trade but a bit apprehensive about the 47mm size. I have a 6.5” wrist and 44mm luminor fits me fine. I hear Radiomir fits smaller but as this model doesn’t have wire lugs would this still be the case? Any wrist shots of a 47mm non wire lug Radiomir on a similar size wrist would be appreciated. Cheers

17 February 2021, 07:59 AM	#19
japenney "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Real Name: Josh Location: Canada Watch: undecided Posts: 4,777	587 and 687 stored in a old broken winder. Cheers. Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk __________________ Follow me on Instagram to see my watch journey @Japenney

13 February 2021, 11:33 PM	#2
Cru Jones 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Paris, France Posts: 34,475	1940 Rads are basically Luminors without the device protecting the crown, so I don’t think there will be a difference in size. Still a great watch. MM dials are special.

13 February 2021, 11:38 PM	#3
emtee "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2017 Real Name: Matt Location: UK Posts: 1,235	That was my fear. So it’s basically like a 372 minus crown guard? 372 looked too big on me when I tried it on sadly. You’re right about the dial, looks awesome but don’t wanna look like a kid who borrowed his Dad’s watch

13 February 2021, 11:39 PM	#4
brandrea 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Brian (TBone) Location: canada Watch: es make me smile Posts: 73,587	Good morning Matt Here is my 690, 1940's case. I have a flat, wide shaped, 7" wrist. IMHO it will come down to the shape of your wrist more so than the size. I do agree the Rad with wire lugs wears smaller than the 1940 Rad with lugs, which wears smaller than the Luminor. From my wearing experience, its much more comfortable than any of the larger Rolex divers (Dblue or SD43) due to its flat case back and cushion case shape. The lugs on the 40's case also taper down toward the wrist which helps make it wear extremely comfortable. FWIW, I've always wanted to add a wire lug RAD but I find they wear a touch top heavy. YMMV 20201207_135937.jpg 20191101_142800.jpg 20190807_074718.jpg 20190322_124144.jpg 20180802_141320.jpg Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk

13 February 2021, 11:55 PM	#5
emtee "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2017 Real Name: Matt Location: UK Posts: 1,235	Thanks Brian, I always enjoy seeing photos of your beautiful 690 Can I ask what the lug to lug measurement is?

14 February 2021, 02:32 AM	#7
TannerBoyl "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2015 Real Name: Steve Location: Redondo Beach, CA Watch: Omega DSOTM Posts: 15	Brandrea, That 690 looks fantastic on your wrist!

16 February 2021, 05:01 AM	#18
Gargamel "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: France Posts: 75	I had many 44mm luminors, a 372 and currently have this 587. 44 looks better on my wrist. But a Pam should wear large. I never love the balance and weight of the steel bettarinis (005/390). Whereas the 372 and 587 have a better distributed weight. Plus the absence of crown guards helps in comfort a lot versus the 372. It's the most comfy Pam i have owned after the 210.

17 February 2021, 08:57 AM	#20
ASW1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: UK Posts: 419	I have a 587 and have around 6.75" wrist. I personally find it wears well. Not much different to a 44mm Luminor. I also have a 422 and the 587 definitely wears smaller. The crown guard adds to bulk on the wrist. https://r.tapatalk.com/shareLink/top...ink_source=app Sent from my moto g 5G plus using Tapatalk

17 February 2021, 06:43 PM	#21
emtee "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2017 Real Name: Matt Location: UK Posts: 1,235	Thanks for all the replies. I think this is one where i'm going to wait until things open up again and I can go and try one on before making the decision.

17 February 2021, 10:47 PM	#22
Gargamel "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: France Posts: 75

4 March 2021, 04:00 PM	#23
AL9C1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2021 Location: Dirty South Posts: 22	^^^ That looks fantastic. First time I’m noticing this model. Excellent.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)