The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12 October 2018, 06:53 AM   #1
ajw44
"TRF" Member
 
ajw44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: CT
Watch: Zeitwerk Date
Posts: 63
Decision Time: Hulk, 16570 Polar ExpII, 216570 ExpII

I'm down to 3! Have my eventual heart set on a gold sub or gold DD 40, but in the meantime I'm looking to round out my collection.

I'm between the 3:

HULK $11-12k


16570 Polar Explorer II (red hand) $4-7k


216570 Explorer II (orange hand) $7-9k



Some brief background:
  • Price does not matter in the above ranges
  • I own a BLNR (GMT) which I love, and I frequently travel
  • I also own a Pam 024b and IWC 8-day Porto so I have other sport/dress watches

One may say "you need a sub", in which case the Hulk would take center stage.

But my other dilemma is that I like the 42mm of the explorer II (orange), and I do not have a white-faced watch. Different colored watch face is intriguing to me as all of mine are black.


Please let me know your thoughts or illustrate anything I may have not thought of. I do love GMT watches but I also love the sub.
ajw44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 06:58 AM   #2
DramaTurtle
"TRF" Member
 
DramaTurtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Real Name: Alex
Location: Niagara Falls
Watch: Polar Explorer
Posts: 1,533
Decision Time: Hulk, 16570 Polar ExpII, 216570 ExpII

Ive owned the hulk and 16570. I traded my hulk for the 16570 and now own the kermit. You be the judge.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
16710 Pepsi | 16570 Polar | 214270 MK2 | PAM00176 | 145.022 Speedy
Quote:
Originally Posted by BDL View Post
Rolex moved to its furthest point of being a tool watch. The new Sea-Dweller and Meteorite GMT seem best suited for raising PGA trophies, and that might be the closest we get to one anyway.
DramaTurtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 07:01 AM   #3
Harry-57
2024 Pledge Member
 
Harry-57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Harry
Location: England
Posts: 9,678
I have both. It would be really hard for me to let one go in favour of the other. I'd keep the Polar if I had no choice but to let one go. Love the Sub. But the Polar looks equally good in a different way. It has more functionality for my needs (I need two time zones more than a timer) is easier for me to read and the blue lumes on the white dial are remarkable to behold. It's a personal thing.
Harry-57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 07:20 AM   #4
DrMattK
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: Matt
Location: United Kingdom
Watch: The Next One
Posts: 50
I have the hulk, BLNR and polar 216570 from your list and if I was choosing it would be the polar 216570.

I travel a lot and really appreciate the dual time but more importantly the ability to jump the hour without stopping the watch (not possible with sub) also the brushed Exp 2 works well as a more casual watch compared to the more dressy BLNR. So why not the 40 mm EXP2, I also love the big hands and the the orange hand which is supper legible and finally I love the white dial and proportions of the 42mm.

All cool watches so can’t go wrong, enjoy


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
DrMattK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 07:23 AM   #5
GolfJunkie
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 X2 Pledge Member
 
GolfJunkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Eric
Location: USA
Watch: 252
Posts: 4,833
Get the 216570. You will not be disappointed
GolfJunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 07:28 AM   #6
Baco Noir
"TRF" Member
 
Baco Noir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Roger
Location: Colorado
Watch: this ya'll
Posts: 4,814
__________________
Current Collection: Rolex 116710BLNR & 216570 polar Explorer II; Omega Apollo 8 Speedmaster; Tudor BB Bronze Bucherer Blue Edition; Heuer Heritage Autavia; Nomos Club Sport Neomatik 42; Breitling Aerospace, Avenger Blackbird, & Superocean 44; Seiko Black Monster; Mickey Mouse Timex Electric; and dare I say it...an Apple Watch too
Baco Noir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 07:31 AM   #7
Yodel
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 167
Wow - IMO you are trying to choose between the best looking Rolex in the range and the ugliest. Suffice to say the hulk is the former and definitely the one you should go for
Yodel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 07:36 AM   #8
Helmi
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Doha
Posts: 2,065
Hulk...
Helmi is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 07:45 AM   #9
doramas
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469


16570
Perfect for everything and the most comfortable of the three.
doramas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 07:46 AM   #10
Baco Noir
"TRF" Member
 
Baco Noir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Roger
Location: Colorado
Watch: this ya'll
Posts: 4,814
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yodel View Post
Wow - IMO you are trying to choose between the best looking Rolex in the range and the ugliest. Suffice to say the hulk is the former and definitely the one you should go for

Some feel the other way but are too kind to insult another person’s taste, or lack thereof.
__________________
Current Collection: Rolex 116710BLNR & 216570 polar Explorer II; Omega Apollo 8 Speedmaster; Tudor BB Bronze Bucherer Blue Edition; Heuer Heritage Autavia; Nomos Club Sport Neomatik 42; Breitling Aerospace, Avenger Blackbird, & Superocean 44; Seiko Black Monster; Mickey Mouse Timex Electric; and dare I say it...an Apple Watch too
Baco Noir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 07:51 AM   #11
Vvvlllooo
"TRF" Member
 
Vvvlllooo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Fl
Posts: 202
hulk hands down
Vvvlllooo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 08:00 AM   #12
Yodel
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 167
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baco Noir View Post
Some feel the other way but are too kind to insult another person’s taste, or lack thereof.
Does the phrase in my opinion not mean anything to you. That’s the whole point of a forum and why people ask questions - to get the opinions of others. Keep your hair on
Yodel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 08:08 AM   #13
Baco Noir
"TRF" Member
 
Baco Noir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Roger
Location: Colorado
Watch: this ya'll
Posts: 4,814
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yodel View Post
Does the phrase in my opinion not mean anything to you. That’s the whole point of a forum and why people ask questions - to get the opinions of others. Keep your hair on
Now that's funny (cause I shave my head!).

I was just trying to say it's more polite to state your choice without insulting the others - it's just the way I was raised.
__________________
Current Collection: Rolex 116710BLNR & 216570 polar Explorer II; Omega Apollo 8 Speedmaster; Tudor BB Bronze Bucherer Blue Edition; Heuer Heritage Autavia; Nomos Club Sport Neomatik 42; Breitling Aerospace, Avenger Blackbird, & Superocean 44; Seiko Black Monster; Mickey Mouse Timex Electric; and dare I say it...an Apple Watch too
Baco Noir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 08:32 AM   #14
Juclaq
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: SoCal
Watch: Sea Dweller 16600
Posts: 158
I would go for the hulk
Juclaq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 08:39 AM   #15
Cru Jones
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34,502
I flipped my white 16570 for a 116610LV and haven’t regretted the trade for a second.
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 09:01 AM   #16
Bluepilot15
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Real Name: Troy
Location: NH
Watch: 16710A
Posts: 151
I’ve have both 5 and 6 series GMTs and have been eyeing the polar. The hulk is gorgeous, but I just don’t need a dive watch. The legibility of the 42mm polar is amazing.
Bluepilot15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 09:06 AM   #17
bigfatpauli
"TRF" Member
 
bigfatpauli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Toronto
Posts: 684
Easy.

bigfatpauli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 09:15 AM   #18
peterpl
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: .
Posts: 6,692
The white explorers are a very very nice watch. I'm fond of the white 42mm.

It will go with everything.

If you buy a Hulk just make sure you really really like green. Many on here have bought one and sold it including myself. Honeymoon period runs out after a few months.
peterpl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 09:20 AM   #19
Chadridv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Chadridv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,343
you already have a GMT, I'd go for the Hulk!
Chadridv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 09:20 AM   #20
ajw44
"TRF" Member
 
ajw44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: CT
Watch: Zeitwerk Date
Posts: 63
I quoted you all because I really appreciate the replies (and i don't know how to tag ppl).

Seems like consensus is split, as I would have and should have suspected for 2 very different watches.

Very impressed to see how many of you actually have a polar explorer 2.

As I said before, the GMT is appealing both because I travel (my BLNR is my primary travel watch due to ease of changing time zones) AND because I do not currently own a white-faced watch.

But the Hulk is the Hulk, and I love the way the face changes color in different lighting. And i love the ceramic green bezel.

Any ideas as to why the large price gap between the 3 models, specifically the Hulk and the Explorers?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DramaTurtle View Post
Ive owned the hulk and 16570. I traded my hulk for the 16570 and now own the kermit. You be the judge.
Forgot to mention that I owned a Kermit but I preferred the ceramic bezel so i got rid of it. But it was a stunner.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry-57 View Post
I have both. It would be really hard for me to let one go in favour of the other. I'd keep the Polar if I had no choice but to let one go. Love the Sub. But the Polar looks equally good in a different way. It has more functionality for my needs (I need two time zones more than a timer) is easier for me to read and the blue lumes on the white dial are remarkable to behold. It's a personal thing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrMattK View Post
I have the hulk, BLNR and polar 216570 from your list and if I was choosing it would be the polar 216570.

I travel a lot and really appreciate the dual time but more importantly the ability to jump the hour without stopping the watch (not possible with sub) also the brushed Exp 2 works well as a more casual watch compared to the more dressy BLNR. So why not the 40 mm EXP2, I also love the big hands and the the orange hand which is supper legible and finally I love the white dial and proportions of the 42mm.

All cool watches so can’t go wrong, enjoy


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote:
Originally Posted by GolfJunkie View Post
Get the 216570. You will not be disappointed
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baco Noir View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yodel View Post
Wow - IMO you are trying to choose between the best looking Rolex in the range and the ugliest. Suffice to say the hulk is the former and definitely the one you should go for
Quote:
Originally Posted by Helmi View Post
Hulk...
Quote:
Originally Posted by doramas View Post


16570
Perfect for everything and the most comfortable of the three.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vvvlllooo View Post
hulk hands down
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baco Noir View Post
Now that's funny (cause I shave my head!).

I was just trying to say it's more polite to state your choice without insulting the others - it's just the way I was raised.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Juclaq View Post
I would go for the hulk
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones View Post
I flipped my white 16570 for a 116610LV and haven’t regretted the trade for a second.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluepilot15 View Post
I’ve have both 5 and 6 series GMTs and have been eyeing the polar. The hulk is gorgeous, but I just don’t need a dive watch. The legibility of the 42mm polar is amazing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigfatpauli View Post
Easy.

ajw44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 09:27 AM   #21
Blake23
"TRF" Member
 
Blake23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 14
Hulk!!
Blake23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 09:30 AM   #22
Mystro
2024 Pledge Member
 
Mystro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 14,714
You have the GMT down. You need a dive watch. A Pam, BLNR, and Hulk is a force.

__________________
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hyitq0aikqgajc0/Time%20sig.jpg?raw=1[/img]
Mystro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 09:38 AM   #23
auto4me
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Cali
Posts: 68
216570 Polar all day, every day.
auto4me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 10:43 AM   #24
HK Islandboy
"TRF" Member
 
HK Islandboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: AP
Posts: 3,825
Hulk
HK Islandboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 10:58 AM   #25
rollee1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Rollee
Location: Boston
Watch: it watching me
Posts: 1,945
The Hulk is one of the most desirable watches in the world, the buyer should be grateful to be offered a chance to purchase one.

The 216570 is always a fallback plan when the one you want is not available , which is most of the time.

16570 is always available and being begged to be accepted, its like someone's least favourite friend; this is no disrespect to owners but a definitive worldwide opinion.
__________________
Time you enjoy wasting was not wasted
rollee1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 11:03 AM   #26
nick800
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 1,578
Hulk without question
nick800 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 11:07 AM   #27
t65tampa
"TRF" Member
 
t65tampa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,031
I really like the current Explorer II. The size is perfect and the dial is crisp and clean looking. It’s a durable and useful reference. I have never been able to appreciate the green Submariner for some reason. I don’t like the folded clasp 5 digit models when an updated version is available.
__________________
t65tampa
t65tampa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 11:14 AM   #28
vladamir15
"TRF" Member
 
vladamir15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: N/A
Watch: AP, VC, Breguet
Posts: 1,580
Hulk by a mile
__________________
The Most Valuable Commodity is Time

Audemars, Vacheron, Breguet, Jaquet Droz, JLC, Rolex, Omega, Cartier
vladamir15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 11:15 AM   #29
charlton
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 23
Incredible Hulk
charlton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 11:46 AM   #30
DoctorA
"TRF" Member
 
DoctorA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 6,523
LVc gets my vote here! It’s the more sought after for a reason!
Very versatile
The beautiful sunburst dial
It’s a sub, arguably the most iconic Rolex
Moving bezel
Good luck
__________________
Wear the watch you like, not the one they tell you to wear!
DoctorA is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
explorer , gmt , hulk , rolex


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.