ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

tedo · 30 December 2021, 02:56 AM

Looking for a “true classic” — here so much about these two, which one would you choose and why?

mg18 · 30 December 2021, 03:04 AM

I would go 233. I find it the most well proportioned pam on the market right now. It wears surprisingly well for a 44mm, it has a gmt function, I like the power reserve indicator, and I personally cannot pull off 47mm.

mijaved · 30 December 2021, 04:14 AM

Two very different watches, you are comparing apples to oranges. The majority on Consensus will shift towards 127 simply because its a classic watch with less clutter on the dial along with the hefty 47mm case.

Other more stronger opinions will follow from the experts.

rootbeer7 · 30 December 2021, 08:33 AM

I had a 233 and felt whilst amazing value it was just too fussy for a Panerai. I went back to a 44 Base 112. If I had the funds and a big wrist I’d take a 127.

Holybatman88 · 30 December 2021, 09:30 AM

Difficult choice both are fantastic classic PAMs. I've owned two 233s both AM/PM and the dot dial (my preference of the two). However, I ended up selling both and now own a PAM 217, the sister watch to the 127. As mentioned above, I love the cleaner dial with all four numerals on the watch. I have a larger wrist, just under 8 inches so the 47mm case works for me. My vote would be for the 127.

Trog · 30 December 2021, 09:54 AM

As I own a 127, I guess I'm biased. However adding a 233 dot-dial to the collection one day remains likely.

rolexbud · 30 December 2021, 05:04 PM

Agree with others the 127 is classic if you can/want to pull off the 47mm size. I owned a 233 (dot dial) and while a great watch, I agree that it was a bit busier than I had anticipated for a PAM and ended up selling it after a couple years.

Recently picked up a PAM 911 and couldn’t be happier with the simplicity of the dial and the how well it wears. If you can try both in person (or a friend’s), that may be the best way to decide!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

tedo · 31 December 2021, 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rolexbud

Agree with others the 127 is classic if you can/want to pull off the 47mm size. I owned a 233 (dot dial) and while a great watch, I agree that it was a bit busier than I had anticipated for a PAM and ended up selling it after a couple years.

Recently picked up a PAM 911 and couldn’t be happier with the simplicity of the dial and the how well it wears. If you can try both in person (or a friend’s), that may be the best way to decide!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Great piece that green 911, like the 1056 as well — but looking specifically for model with the domed crystal. Also saw the 270, similar to 233?

brandrea · 31 December 2021, 12:44 AM

I prefer the 127. 47 mm just speaks to me

Avs Fan · 31 December 2021, 05:38 AM

I liked the 233 when first introduced. Back then (and now) the fiddy was very popular. I had a chance to put a 127 on my wrist when I was wearing my 232 for comparison. I preferred the 232. So... I think I'd go 233. If original logo base was in the mix that would be the one.

Cru Jones · 31 December 2021, 09:41 AM

You have a PAM GMT, so go for the 127.

jjvd21 · 31 December 2021, 01:42 PM

I have a 233 dot dial and it’s my favorite piece. Can’t go wrong with either, both are special.

Joearch · 31 December 2021, 02:52 PM

Have had a 127 and currently have a 233. Both are great but 233 is a better everyday wear for me.

pdnb · 1 January 2022, 05:10 PM

Most Rolex owners choose (based on TRF responses) 233 vs the 127….however most panerai purists would suggest the 127.

I loved my 233 dot for years. I would consider a 127, as long as you can pull it off on your wrist. My wrist at 7” I think can support the 127 but the market price is a lot more than a preowned 233.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

arnage · 2 January 2022, 02:16 PM

I happen to have both; I think that if your wrist size is sufficient, the 127 is the one to get. The proportions are really splendid on the watch. The 233 is a little "fussy" looking on the dial, as many have pointed out. But it actually is a great watch for everyday comfort (size..) and utility (8 day, gmt..).

HL65 · 2 January 2022, 07:37 PM

127 Fiddy all day long.

Zyfon · 2 January 2022, 08:37 PM

Love the looks of the 127, but it was just too big to wear as an everyday watch. My 233 Dot has been on my wrist about 3 or 4 days a week for the past 2 years.

inadeje · 3 January 2022, 12:37 AM

I have a 7 3/4 wrist and have owned the 127 Fiddy for many years. I remember when the 233 emerged. If you have the funds and wrist size to pull it off, the 127 is the peak of the Panerai desirability mountain and you’ll never regret it.

mailman · 3 January 2022, 07:31 AM

I have a 233 and I love it but I’d choose the 127.

6XYBE63ST · 14 January 2022, 07:43 AM

i prefer the 233

Polar Bear · 14 January 2022, 10:02 AM

Fiddy all day

SudiYunus · 14 January 2022, 04:03 PM

233

MDP_GTS · 17 January 2022, 03:51 AM

Both are awesome watches! If I had to choose one I would go Fiddy.

TswaneNguni · 18 January 2022, 06:41 AM

Great choices ,but 127 wins .

bonovox · 18 January 2022, 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TswaneNguni

Great choices ,but 127 wins .

I agree, but can't go wrong with either

njlam · 23 March 2022, 02:48 AM

I think if you can only own one, it is the 233.

Hard to buy the 127 if you don't have the wrist for it.

The 233 and 127 are 2 of my top three Panerais (372 being the third and most affordable). Still debating if I can pull off a 47MM.

30 December 2021, 02:56 AM	#1
tedo "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2021 Location: CA Posts: 467	127 (Fiddy) or 233 Looking for a “true classic” — here so much about these two, which one would you choose and why? __________________ Both past and present … Santos de Cartier • Hublot BB • Panerai Luminor • Patek Calatrava • AP Royal Oak • Omega • Hermès • Breitling • Rolex • IWC Schaffhausen • TAG Heuer • Doxa

30 December 2021, 04:14 AM	#3
mijaved "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Real Name: Imran Location: UK Watch: Bluesy,16600,16610 Posts: 86	Two very different watches, you are comparing apples to oranges. The majority on Consensus will shift towards 127 simply because its a classic watch with less clutter on the dial along with the hefty 47mm case. Other more stronger opinions will follow from the experts. __________________ Rolex Sub 116613LBD, Rolex Sub 16610, Rolex SeaDweller 16600, Rolex OYSTER PERPETUAL DATE 15238, BREITLING CHRONOMAT A13356

30 December 2021, 08:33 AM	#4
rootbeer7 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2014 Location: london Posts: 5,959	I had a 233 and felt whilst amazing value it was just too fussy for a Panerai. I went back to a 44 Base 112. If I had the funds and a big wrist I’d take a 127. __________________ @imrootbeer7

2 January 2022, 07:37 PM	#16
HL65 TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Ken Location: SW Florida Watch: One on my wrist. Posts: 63,398	127 Fiddy all day long. __________________ *SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT*

3 January 2022, 12:37 AM	#18
inadeje 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Miami Watch: me lose count. Posts: 5,568	I have a 7 3/4 wrist and have owned the 127 Fiddy for many years. I remember when the 233 emerged. If you have the funds and wrist size to pull it off, the 127 is the peak of the Panerai desirability mountain and you’ll never regret it. __________________ ♛ 116689 ♛ 116500LN Blk ♛ 116500LN Wht ♛ Sky Dweller 326934-003 ♛ 126710BLNR ♛ 126710BLRO - ♛ 126610LV ♛ 16520 ♛ 16523 ♛ 16610 ♛ 5513 Birth Year - ✠ Patek Philippe 5980/1A-001 - AP 26331ST Panda - Panerai Fiddy 127, Bronzo 671, 687, 111, Ω Speedmaster 1957 Broad Arrow, Daniel Roth Endurer Chronosprint, Cartier Santos XL - ✿ Tudor Black Bay 58 Bronze M79012M, Montblanc TimeWalker Chrono 41

30 December 2021, 03:04 AM	#2
mg18 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2015 Location: Toronto Watch: 126710BLRO Posts: 696	I would go 233. I find it the most well proportioned pam on the market right now. It wears surprisingly well for a 44mm, it has a gmt function, I like the power reserve indicator, and I personally cannot pull off 47mm.

30 December 2021, 09:30 AM	#5
Holybatman88 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2017 Location: NZ Posts: 38	Difficult choice both are fantastic classic PAMs. I've owned two 233s both AM/PM and the dot dial (my preference of the two). However, I ended up selling both and now own a PAM 217, the sister watch to the 127. As mentioned above, I love the cleaner dial with all four numerals on the watch. I have a larger wrist, just under 8 inches so the 47mm case works for me. My vote would be for the 127.

30 December 2021, 09:54 AM	#6
Trog Banned Join Date: Apr 2014 Location: Great White North Posts: 696	As I own a 127, I guess I'm biased. However adding a 233 dot-dial to the collection one day remains likely.

30 December 2021, 05:04 PM	#7
rolexbud "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2012 Location: SF Bay Area Posts: 19	Agree with others the 127 is classic if you can/want to pull off the 47mm size. I owned a 233 (dot dial) and while a great watch, I agree that it was a bit busier than I had anticipated for a PAM and ended up selling it after a couple years. Recently picked up a PAM 911 and couldn’t be happier with the simplicity of the dial and the how well it wears. If you can try both in person (or a friend’s), that may be the best way to decide! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

31 December 2021, 12:44 AM	#9
brandrea 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Brian (TBone) Location: canada Watch: es make me smile Posts: 73,672	I prefer the 127. 47 mm just speaks to me

31 December 2021, 05:38 AM	#10
Avs Fan "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Colorado Posts: 2,385	I liked the 233 when first introduced. Back then (and now) the fiddy was very popular. I had a chance to put a 127 on my wrist when I was wearing my 232 for comparison. I preferred the 232. So... I think I'd go 233. If original logo base was in the mix that would be the one.

31 December 2021, 09:41 AM	#11
Cru Jones 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Paris, France Posts: 34,495	You have a PAM GMT, so go for the 127.

31 December 2021, 01:42 PM	#12
jjvd21 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2019 Location: Chicago Posts: 24	I have a 233 dot dial and it’s my favorite piece. Can’t go wrong with either, both are special.

31 December 2021, 02:52 PM	#13
Joearch 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Joe Location: Los Angeles Watch: Daytona + GMT BLNR Posts: 4,479	Have had a 127 and currently have a 233. Both are great but 233 is a better everyday wear for me.

1 January 2022, 05:10 PM	#14
pdnb "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: The best coast Watch: 5726, 5212 Posts: 637	Most Rolex owners choose (based on TRF responses) 233 vs the 127….however most panerai purists would suggest the 127. I loved my 233 dot for years. I would consider a 127, as long as you can pull it off on your wrist. My wrist at 7” I think can support the 127 but the market price is a lot more than a preowned 233. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

2 January 2022, 02:16 PM	#15
arnage "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: NJ Posts: 317	I happen to have both; I think that if your wrist size is sufficient, the 127 is the one to get. The proportions are really splendid on the watch. The 233 is a little "fussy" looking on the dial, as many have pointed out. But it actually is a great watch for everyday comfort (size..) and utility (8 day, gmt..).

2 January 2022, 08:37 PM	#17
Zyfon "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2015 Location: Thailand Watch: Rolex & Panerai Posts: 424	Love the looks of the 127, but it was just too big to wear as an everyday watch. My 233 Dot has been on my wrist about 3 or 4 days a week for the past 2 years.

3 January 2022, 07:31 AM	#19
mailman TRF Moderator & DATE-JUST41 2024 Patron Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: . Watch: 126610LN Posts: 35,359	I have a 233 and I love it but I’d choose the 127. __________________ JJ

14 January 2022, 07:43 AM	#20
6XYBE63ST Banned Join Date: Mar 2021 Location: kommyfornia Posts: 202	i prefer the 233

14 January 2022, 10:02 AM	#21
Polar Bear "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2021 Location: Australia Watch: Panerai PAM687 Posts: 762	Fiddy all day

14 January 2022, 04:03 PM	#22
SudiYunus "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2020 Location: Washington Watch: Cartier Panthere Posts: 961	233 __________________ Cartier Panthere ,Tudor GMT Cartier Santos 100 XL ,Tudor 925 DJ 36 Pink Dial ,PAM Due Blue DJ 36 White Dial ,CasiOak Sub ND

17 January 2022, 03:51 AM	#23
MDP_GTS "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2021 Location: OHIO Posts: 9	Both are awesome watches! If I had to choose one I would go Fiddy.

18 January 2022, 06:41 AM	#24
TswaneNguni "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Real Name: Chris Location: . Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs Posts: 12,608	Great choices ,but 127 wins .

23 March 2022, 02:48 AM	#26
njlam 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Pacific NW Posts: 523	I think if you can only own one, it is the 233. Hard to buy the 127 if you don't have the wrist for it. The 233 and 127 are 2 of my top three Panerais (372 being the third and most affordable). Still debating if I can pull off a 47MM. __________________ Rolex Day-Date 118208 YG/Datejust 116139 WG/GMT2 116710 BLNR SS Patek Philippe Calatrava 5096 RG - Omega Speedmaster 3861 Sapphire SS Cartier Tank Louis 1140 YG - Panerai GMT 233 SS - Zenith Chrono 01.0240.410 SS JLC Reverso Duo Q2714910 SS - Grand Seiko SGBA407 - Baltic Aquascaphe SS TAG Heuer Formula One - Swatch MoonSwatch Mission to the Moon/Mercury/Jupiter/Neptune

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)