Too thick...???

[EEpro]

Bumping this from reading the 11 v 12 thread.

321 sits way better than a submariner for me. Competitive to Daytona in comfort for me which was/is unexpected.

[brandrea]

Originally Posted by EEpro

Bumping this from reading the 11 v 12 thread.

321 sits way better than a submariner for me. Competitive to Daytona in comfort for me which was/is unexpected.

Yep, fits me exactly the same way.

For others, like Gus and Tom, it wears top heavy. All depends on the wrist much like any other watch I suppose. What works for some, doesn’t work for others.

It’s really unfortunate that potential buyers can’t try these watches on before purchasing, but such is the watch world these days.

[subtona]

It is thick and it wears thick.

[Tqmb79]

It’s not thick. I don’t have one but I have seen and tried on. I also have a 300m in rubber and the new 3861 speedy. Both theses omegas are thick on paper. But on the wrist you would never know it. I also have Tudor gmt and the new Tudor burgundy. Those wear huge compared to the omegas. The omegas actually surprise me by how well they wear and sit on the wrist. Tudor needs to learn from them. In comparison to my Rolex, yes they do wear and sit slimmer but honestly it’s not by a huge margin at all. On paper the Rolex is way thinner, in real life on the wrist it’s barely noticeable. As long as your wrist is 6.5 or above, you will never think of it as a thick watch. Its perfection actually

[Seo]

Originally Posted by EEpro

Bumping this from reading the 11 v 12 thread.

321 sits way better than a submariner for me. Competitive to Daytona in comfort for me which was/is unexpected.

Wow that does sit well. Amazing how wrist shape makes such a difference.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[EmJay]

hesalite gives an illusion that it is thicker than it really is.

[Dirt]

Originally Posted by RW16610

Oh my goodness, the side profile of that watch is remarkable! That style of crystal is certainly something to admire.

Yes it is