The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21 December 2022, 02:54 PM   #1
TheVTCGuy
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeJoeBobo View Post
I’ll just put this here as someone quoted incorrectly Porsche 100% EV by 2030.

https://www.motor1.com/news/627581/p...roduction-911/
My mistake, it is AUDI, and the year they will stop selling ICE powered vehicles is 2033. Don’t ask me why I thought it was Porsche

https://www.firstpost.com/tech/auto-...c-9744401.html
TheVTCGuy is offline  
Old 21 December 2022, 11:48 AM   #2
Cloudchaser
"TRF" Member
 
Cloudchaser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Wild Wild West
Watch: Watching
Posts: 1,755
I bought my 2022 Audi EV for the tax breaks. I'm not an EV cultist or anything but when I add the $7500 EV tax credit to the Section 179 benefits around depreciating it 100% in the first year I put it in service (yes, it's that freaking heavy!), well...

It became an affordable luxury car paid for in large part by my Uncle, Sam. Lemme see...big federal tax bill or new Audi? Sort of a no-brainer.

Nice car, too.
__________________
Two Factor Authentication Enabled On My Account.
Cloudchaser is offline  
Old 21 December 2022, 01:52 PM   #3
DLRIDES
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
DLRIDES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: NC/WY
Watch: Me
Posts: 4,621
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cloudchaser View Post
I bought my 2022 Audi EV for the tax breaks. I'm not an EV cultist or anything but when I add the $7500 EV tax credit to the Section 179 benefits around depreciating it 100% in the first year I put it in service (yes, it's that freaking heavy!), well...

It became an affordable luxury car paid for in large part by my Uncle, Sam. Lemme see...big federal tax bill or new Audi? Sort of a no-brainer.

Nice car, too.
Somewhere there is a young man changing truck tires in ankle deep mud, at thirty five degrees and wind blowing, hoping he will have the energy to attend his classes tonight at the local community college. Meanwhile the wife is working third shift at a factory while her husband cares for their child after he leaves night classes, and she hopes she has the energy to make it home and get her child ready for school before collapsing.

Both are paying taxes = Uncle Sam = tax credits = luxury car = paid for in large part.

Send them a Thank You card ……………………………….
__________________
”When citizens learn to vote themselves the treasury, they limit prosperity.”
DLRIDES is offline  
Old 21 December 2022, 02:17 PM   #4
pickettt
"TRF" Member
 
pickettt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: California
Watch: Shiny One
Posts: 5,370
Quote:
Originally Posted by DLRIDES View Post
Somewhere there is a young man changing truck tires in ankle deep mud, at thirty five degrees and wind blowing, hoping he will have the energy to attend his classes tonight at the local community college. Meanwhile the wife is working third shift at a factory while her husband cares for their child after he leaves night classes, and she hopes she has the energy to make it home and get her child ready for school before collapsing.

Both are paying taxes = Uncle Sam = tax credits = luxury car = paid for in large part.

Send them a Thank You card ……………………………….
I may agree with you, but with all due respect, he doesn't write the tax code. Perhaps an F You card to lawmakers who write laws to directly benefit themselves. BTW, the last time I read the laws regarding writing off vehicles, there were more requirements than just weight. Watch yourselves out there.
pickettt is offline  
Old 21 December 2022, 03:55 PM   #5
Cloudchaser
"TRF" Member
 
Cloudchaser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Wild Wild West
Watch: Watching
Posts: 1,755
Quote:
Originally Posted by pickettt View Post
I may agree with you, but with all due respect, he doesn't write the tax code. Perhaps an F You card to lawmakers who write laws to directly benefit themselves. BTW, the last time I read the laws regarding writing off vehicles, there were more requirements than just weight. Watch yourselves out there.
Reading tax law sounds excruciatingly boring. This is why there are CPAs.
__________________
Two Factor Authentication Enabled On My Account.
Cloudchaser is offline  
Old 21 December 2022, 03:48 PM   #6
Cloudchaser
"TRF" Member
 
Cloudchaser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Wild Wild West
Watch: Watching
Posts: 1,755
Quote:
Originally Posted by DLRIDES View Post
Somewhere there is a young man changing truck tires in ankle deep mud, at thirty five degrees and wind blowing, hoping he will have the energy to attend his classes tonight at the local community college. Meanwhile the wife is working third shift at a factory while her husband cares for their child after he leaves night classes, and she hopes she has the energy to make it home and get her child ready for school before collapsing.

Both are paying taxes = Uncle Sam = tax credits = luxury car = paid for in large part.

Send them a Thank You card ……………………………….
If we're looking at it like that, then the taxes that I pay are funding that community college that he's attending and the school they're sending the kid to. And the factory she works in is operating on similar asset depreciation loopholes.

I'm merely following the tax codes. Don't hate the player, as they say.
__________________
Two Factor Authentication Enabled On My Account.
Cloudchaser is offline  
Old 21 December 2022, 03:31 PM   #7
RichardBartlett
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: Tenerife
Posts: 581
There is a guy calls himself the electric viking who posts hundreds of videos on YT about electric vehicles
Now he's a strong convert so is reasonably biased ok heavily biased but he digs out and collates information about EV developments but freely admits not all will work, do work or will ever work but his efforts show just how much and how fast this technology is advancing. back in '05 ish I was lucky to be involved very very briefly in a UK towns electric bus wireless charging project. They set wireless chargers in the ground at bus stops so when busses stopped to drop and pick up they took on charge. These busses had old lead acid batteries because that's where the tech was, but in a few short years such is the progress new busses will have lithium (much better) and the next generation will probably be sodium (x4 better than lithium) .
if they re did the test now the results would be incredible such is the rate of progress

The speed of development in all aspects of EV are mind boggling and if you don't think man can overcome their adversities when thousands and thousands of engineers and billions and billions of dollars are being thrown at the various problems I'm guessing you're likely to be on the wrong side of history.
This tech has so may spill offs into other industries. Cordless power tools and household appliances, mobiles etc will benefit with greater battery strength.


Don't be a party pooping naysayer, stand back and marvel at this new technology going forward and wonder where it can take us rather than moan because we are not there yet.
RichardBartlett is offline  
Old 21 December 2022, 04:00 PM   #8
Cloudchaser
"TRF" Member
 
Cloudchaser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Wild Wild West
Watch: Watching
Posts: 1,755
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardBartlett View Post
There is a guy calls himself the electric viking who posts hundreds of videos on YT about electric vehicles
Now he's a strong convert so is reasonably biased ok heavily biased but he digs out and collates information about EV developments but freely admits not all will work, do work or will ever work but his efforts show just how much and how fast this technology is advancing. back in '05 ish I was lucky to be involved very very briefly in a UK towns electric bus wireless charging project. They set wireless chargers in the ground at bus stops so when busses stopped to drop and pick up they took on charge. These busses had old lead acid batteries because that's where the tech was, but in a few short years such is the progress new busses will have lithium (much better) and the next generation will probably be sodium (x4 better than lithium) .
if they re did the test now the results would be incredible such is the rate of progress

The speed of development in all aspects of EV are mind boggling and if you don't think man can overcome their adversities when thousands and thousands of engineers and billions and billions of dollars are being thrown at the various problems I'm guessing you're likely to be on the wrong side of history.
This tech has so may spill offs into other industries. Cordless power tools and household appliances, mobiles etc will benefit with greater battery strength.


Don't be a party pooping naysayer, stand back and marvel at this new technology going forward and wonder where it can take us rather than moan because we are not there yet.
Toyota, the company that started much of this with the Prius (hybrid), would by this logic be a party pooping naysayer on the wrong side of history. I don't think anything is quite so settled yet. We're still in the early stages of the propulsion revolution.
__________________
Two Factor Authentication Enabled On My Account.
Cloudchaser is offline  
Old 21 December 2022, 04:05 PM   #9
Andad
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 36,922
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardBartlett View Post
There is a guy calls himself the electric viking who posts hundreds of videos on YT about electric vehicles
Now he's a strong convert so is reasonably biased ok heavily biased but he digs out and collates information about EV developments but freely admits not all will work, do work or will ever work but his efforts show just how much and how fast this technology is advancing. back in '05 ish I was lucky to be involved very very briefly in a UK towns electric bus wireless charging project. They set wireless chargers in the ground at bus stops so when busses stopped to drop and pick up they took on charge. These busses had old lead acid batteries because that's where the tech was, but in a few short years such is the progress new busses will have lithium (much better) and the next generation will probably be sodium (x4 better than lithium) .
if they re did the test now the results would be incredible such is the rate of progress

The speed of development in all aspects of EV are mind boggling and if you don't think man can overcome their adversities when thousands and thousands of engineers and billions and billions of dollars are being thrown at the various problems I'm guessing you're likely to be on the wrong side of history.
This tech has so may spill offs into other industries. Cordless power tools and household appliances, mobiles etc will benefit with greater battery strength.


Don't be a party pooping naysayer, stand back and marvel at this new technology going forward and wonder where it can take us rather than moan because we are not there yet.
Are you also recommending electric cruise ships Richard?

Would they be a contributor to polluting our atmosphere?

Other news.

Electric car owners’ costs jump
December 13, 2022
UPDATED: Norwegian politicians have offered lots of electric car incentives over the years but they’re quickly disappearing, even as Norway urgently needs to cut carbon emissions. The latest electric car shock came just last week, when the City of Oslo nearly tripled the cost of recharging at city-owned charging posts, before being forced to shift into reverse.
__________________
E

Andad is online now  
Old 21 December 2022, 04:30 PM   #10
TheVTCGuy
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardBartlett View Post
There is a guy calls himself the electric viking who posts hundreds of videos on YT about electric vehicles
Now he's a strong convert so is reasonably biased ok heavily biased but he digs out and collates information about EV developments but freely admits not all will work, do work or will ever work but his efforts show just how much and how fast this technology is advancing. back in '05 ish I was lucky to be involved very very briefly in a UK towns electric bus wireless charging project. They set wireless chargers in the ground at bus stops so when busses stopped to drop and pick up they took on charge. These busses had old lead acid batteries because that's where the tech was, but in a few short years such is the progress new busses will have lithium (much better) and the next generation will probably be sodium (x4 better than lithium) .
if they re did the test now the results would be incredible such is the rate of progress

The speed of development in all aspects of EV are mind boggling and if you don't think man can overcome their adversities when thousands and thousands of engineers and billions and billions of dollars are being thrown at the various problems I'm guessing you're likely to be on the wrong side of history.
This tech has so may spill offs into other industries. Cordless power tools and household appliances, mobiles etc will benefit with greater battery strength.


Don't be a party pooping naysayer, stand back and marvel at this new technology going forward and wonder where it can take us rather than moan because we are not there yet.
Very well stated and exactly my opinion s well. There are TONS of problems and challenges to overcome, but there is such a HUGE effort underway they all will be. It will take decades, but it will happen.
TheVTCGuy is offline  
Old 22 December 2022, 01:18 AM   #11
Krash
2024 Pledge Member
 
Krash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Florida
Watch: Sub, DJ41, GMT
Posts: 7,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardBartlett View Post

Don't be a party pooping naysayer, stand back and marvel at this new technology going forward and wonder where it can take us rather than moan because we are not there yet.
It's hard to marvel at the technology when there are significant limitations.

During Hurrican Ian, my wife and I had to go on a rescue mission. We had to drive from Northeast Florida to Fort Meyers to pick up my mother-in-law and bring her home. Approximately 300 miles.

Most EVs wouldn't make it without us having to stop for a lengthy charge. Ridiculous. This was an emergency situation. Plus, when we got there, there was no power and no way for us to charge the car for a return trip.

The standard response from EV advocates is to simply buy one with a 400 mile range, but that's quite a lame argument. Our Subaru Outback was the perfect car for the job. Plus, it's sort of rugged, so that was also nice when driving through poor conditions.
Krash is online now  
Old 22 December 2022, 01:59 AM   #12
Star Ferry
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: down by the river
Posts: 4,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krash View Post
It's hard to marvel at the technology when there are significant limitations.

During Hurrican Ian, my wife and I had to go on a rescue mission. We had to drive from Northeast Florida to Fort Meyers to pick up my mother-in-law and bring her home. Approximately 300 miles.

Most EVs wouldn't make it without us having to stop for a lengthy charge. Ridiculous. This was an emergency situation. Plus, when we got there, there was no power and no way for us to charge the car for a return trip.

The standard response from EV advocates is to simply buy one with a 400 mile range, but that's quite a lame argument. Our Subaru Outback was the perfect car for the job. Plus, it's sort of rugged, so that was also nice when driving through poor conditions.
Problem is, hardcore ideological backers of EV don't care about situations like this. They'd consider it a worthwhile sacrifice for the greater good. Further, any super-elite would still have access to a fleet of ICE vehicles in an emergency -- it's only the average Joes who would lack access.
Star Ferry is offline  
Old 22 December 2022, 02:05 AM   #13
Krash
2024 Pledge Member
 
Krash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Florida
Watch: Sub, DJ41, GMT
Posts: 7,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by Star Ferry View Post
Problem is, hardcore ideological backers of EV don't care about situations like this. They'd consider it a worthwhile sacrifice for the greater good. Further, any super-elite would still have access to a fleet of ICE vehicles in an emergency -- it's only the average Joes who would lack access.

100% correct


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Krash is online now  
Old 21 December 2022, 10:34 PM   #14
TheVTCGuy
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
Another state, OREGON, joined California, New York, Massachusetts and Washington to ban the sale of new, gas-only cars by 2035. Of course you can still drive gas only cars after 2035, just can’t purchase new ones in those states. You will still be able to buy new Hybrids, kind of the best of both worlds IMHO.
TheVTCGuy is offline  
Old 22 December 2022, 01:51 AM   #15
austinp
"TRF" Member
 
austinp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: us
Posts: 3,283
Electric cars.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheVTCGuy View Post
Another state, OREGON, joined California, New York, Massachusetts and Washington to ban the sale of new, gas-only cars by 2035. Of course you can still drive gas only cars after 2035, just can’t purchase new ones in those states. You will still be able to buy new Hybrids, kind of the best of both worlds IMHO.

I think the Ban is sometimes the thing that rubs a lot of people the wrong way. Most Americans don’t like to be forced to do anything. If EV is truly better it should organically overtake the other options and become the industry leader on its own without a ban.

I agree with you. we should have put more resources into hybrid tech. Seems the best of both worlds.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk on
austinp is online now  
Old 22 December 2022, 03:26 AM   #16
TheVTCGuy
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by austinp View Post
I think the Ban is sometimes the thing that rubs a lot of people the wrong way. Most Americans don’t like to be forced to do anything. If EV is truly better it should organically overtake the other options and become the industry leader on its own without a ban.

I agree with you. we should have put more resources into hybrid tech. Seems the best of both worlds.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk on
You know what, that is an excellent point. I am beginning to think Americans are more upset with the government (practically) MANDATING that they switch to non-ICE vehicles than actually making the transition. I think there will still be significant resistance until EVs equal ICE in all areas, price, range, convenience, but IMHO that will happen.
TheVTCGuy is offline  
Old 22 December 2022, 03:51 AM   #17
Cloudchaser
"TRF" Member
 
Cloudchaser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Wild Wild West
Watch: Watching
Posts: 1,755
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheVTCGuy View Post
You know what, that is an excellent point. I am beginning to think Americans are more upset with the government (practically) MANDATING that they switch to non-ICE vehicles than actually making the transition. I think there will still be significant resistance until EVs equal ICE in all areas, price, range, convenience, but IMHO that will happen.
We are driving our EV and enjoying it. Beyond the tax breaks, I do enjoy the car and tech.

HOWEVER...

On two different road trips through CA this summer I was reminded of just how far we have to go. During heat waves in the San Joaquin Valley, charging speed wanes, the number of inoperable chargers increases, and warnings from the state about power grid limitations are real.

All of the promise of the future doesn't mean much when I'm melting in Coalinga waiting to use one of the 50% of chargers still operating, while commiserating with other EV drivers about the difficulties. Theatre of the absurd a few times now.

That's the reality; if you're not simply charging at home, the system sucks. CA needs a major power grid overhaul and their answer is to instead overburden the old one via mandate. It's a bit of a clown show at its base.

And now that the political vilification begins of the company with the best charging network, who really knows what's next. Long way to go still.

But rah rah rah EVs in CA!!!
__________________
Two Factor Authentication Enabled On My Account.
Cloudchaser is offline  
Old 22 December 2022, 05:15 AM   #18
bondtoys
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: World
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,720
Quote:
Originally Posted by austinp View Post
I think the Ban is sometimes the thing that rubs a lot of people the wrong way. Most Americans don’t like to be forced to do anything. If EV is truly better it should organically overtake the other options and become the industry leader on its own without a ban.
Let‘s be honest.
Without bans, people will go for the cheapest option and the cheapest option is to continue burning oil with all negative consequences for future generations ( who finally pay for our present „cheap“).
Recklessly polluting mother nature was always the „cheapest“ option and some regulations to stop all this was always necessary and will always be.

So we need some rules (bans) to push all the necessary investments into our grids etc. as they don‘t come cheap.
bondtoys is offline  
Old 22 December 2022, 05:27 AM   #19
Star Ferry
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: down by the river
Posts: 4,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by bondtoys View Post
Let‘s be honest.
Without bans, people will go for the cheapest option and the cheapest option is to continue burning oil with all negative consequences for future generations ( who finally pay for our present „cheap“).
Recklessly polluting mother nature was always the „cheapest“ option and some regulations to stop all this was always necessary and always be.

So we need some rules (bans) to push all the necessary investments into our grids etc. as they don‘t come cheap.
I was okay with this thread until you assumed nature's gender. Now I'm sobbing
Star Ferry is offline  
Old 22 December 2022, 05:30 AM   #20
Krash
2024 Pledge Member
 
Krash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Florida
Watch: Sub, DJ41, GMT
Posts: 7,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by bondtoys View Post
Let‘s be honest.
Without bans, people will go for the cheapest option and the cheapest option is to continue burning oil with all negative consequences for future generations ( who finally pay for our present „cheap“).
Recklessly polluting mother nature was always the „cheapest“ option and some regulations to stop all this was always necessary and always be.

So we need some rules (bans) to push all the necessary investments into our grids etc. as they don‘t come cheap.
EVs consume electricity.
Krash is online now  
Old 22 December 2022, 06:49 AM   #21
bondtoys
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: World
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krash View Post
EVs consume electricity.
That is true!

But there are sustainable ways to produce electricity than burning coal and oil - and not to forget the issues with nuclear.
The fact that the US largely rely on those energy sources is not hammered in stone.
That can be changed but needs investments —> expensive —> needs regulations because polluting the air is the cheapest option.
bondtoys is offline  
Old 22 December 2022, 05:32 AM   #22
austinp
"TRF" Member
 
austinp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: us
Posts: 3,283
Electric cars.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bondtoys View Post
Let‘s be honest.
Without bans, people will go for the cheapest option and the cheapest option is to continue burning oil with all negative consequences for future generations ( who finally pay for our present „cheap“).
Recklessly polluting mother nature was always the „cheapest“ option and some regulations to stop all this was always necessary and will always be.

So we need some rules (bans) to push all the necessary investments into our grids etc. as they don‘t come cheap.

You don’t think EVs will eventually sell for the same as ICE?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
austinp is online now  
Old 22 December 2022, 06:52 AM   #23
bondtoys
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: World
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,720
Quote:
Originally Posted by austinp View Post
You don’t think EVs will eventually sell for the same as ICE?
Perhaps one day, I honestly don‘t know.
But if everybody waits until that happens, it probably won‘t happen at all.
bondtoys is offline  
Old 22 December 2022, 07:23 AM   #24
RichardBartlett
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: Tenerife
Posts: 581
Quote:
Originally Posted by austinp View Post
You don’t think EVs will eventually sell for the same as ICE?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
they are close to parity and as the tech advances will become cheaper.
the main issue is legacy manufacturers trying to claw back investment from early adopters
RichardBartlett is offline  
Old 24 December 2022, 02:45 AM   #25
SwissmadeTexan
2024 Pledge Member
 
SwissmadeTexan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Chris
Location: Houston, Texas
Watch: SUB LV-C/Pepsi C
Posts: 415
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheVTCGuy View Post
Another state, OREGON, joined California, New York, Massachusetts and Washington to ban the sale of new, gas-only cars by 2035. Of course you can still drive gas only cars after 2035, just can’t purchase new ones in those states. You will still be able to buy new Hybrids, kind of the best of both worlds IMHO.

Thank God I live in Texas. We aren’t stupid enough here to put bans like this in place before the technology and infrastructure has been ironed out. Its much further than 12 years away.

It’s bananas to imagine that in 12 short years citizens of those places won’t be able to purchase new gas powered vehicles. And it’s baffling that nobody in those places seem to care how this will affect poor people in particular. Typical I guess for those places…
__________________
Where do we go from here???
SwissmadeTexan is offline  
Old 24 December 2022, 02:51 AM   #26
Blansky
2024 Pledge Member
 
Blansky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: swmnpoolsmovie*
Posts: 9,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by SwissmadeTexan View Post
Thank God I live in Texas. We aren’t stupid enough here to put bans like this in place before the technology and infrastructure has been ironed out. Its much further than 12 years away.

It’s bananas to imagine that in 12 short years citizens of those places won’t be able to purchase new gas powered vehicles. And it’s baffling that nobody in those places seem to care how this will affect poor people in particular. Typical I guess for those places…
Yes but don't forget Texas is HEAVILY involved in the oil and gas industry. Not exactly an unbiased player in the game.
__________________
OlllllllO
Blansky is offline  
Old 21 December 2022, 10:48 PM   #27
Watchflair
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Watchflair's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Jim
Location: Westchester NY
Watch: 116500 116518LN
Posts: 5,879
Hydrogen…

It’s coming and sustainable with infrastructure that’s already in place with up fits.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Remember what matters. Value everyday
Watchflair is offline  
Old 22 December 2022, 07:47 AM   #28
Vince M.
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: LA
Watch: Meteorite
Posts: 615
Cant wait until Elon turns 20% of Texas into a superfund site by strip mining and processing lithium.
Vince M. is offline  
Old 22 December 2022, 08:53 AM   #29
East Bay Rider
"TRF" Member
 
East Bay Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Bill
Location: East Bay RI
Watch: GMT-II 16710LN
Posts: 11,903
In the US states that don't require vehicle inspections, independent minded people will be dragging old cars out of fields rather than "upgrade" to something that they feel is being forced upon them.
__________________
I bought a cheap watch from the crazy man
Floating down canal
It doesn't use numbers or moving hands
It always just says "now"
Now you may be thinking that I was had
But this watch is never wrong
And if I have trouble the warranty said
Breathe In, Breathe Out, Move On
J. Buffett
Instagram: eastbayrider46
East Bay Rider is offline  
Old 22 December 2022, 08:54 AM   #30
TheVTCGuy
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by East Bay Rider View Post
In the US states that don't require vehicle inspections, independent minded people will be dragging old cars out of fields rather than "upgrade" to something that they feel is being forced upon them.
Can’t argue with this, I think you’re right.
TheVTCGuy is offline  
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Bernard Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.